Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
1.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 33(6): 715-722, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306165

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set for the frequency and modality of prenatal care visits. Material and Methods: A consensus development study was conducted in the United States with participants, including 31 health care professionals, 12 public policy members or public health payers, and 18 public members, representing 24 states. A modified Delphi method and modified nominal group technique were utilized. Results: Twenty-one potential core outcomes were developed by combining the outcomes reported in three systematic reviews that evaluated the frequency of prenatal care visits or modality of prenatal visit type (e.g., in person, telemedicine, or hybrids of both). Eighteen consensus outcomes were identified from the Delphi process, following which 10 maternal and 4 neonatal outcomes were agreed at the consensus development meeting. Maternal core outcomes include maternal quality of life; maternal mental health outcomes; the experience of maternity care; lost time; attendance of recommended visits; unplanned care utilization; completion of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-recommended services; diagnosis of obstetric complications-proportion and timing; disparities in care outcomes; and severe maternal morbidity or mortality. Neonatal core outcomes include gestational age at birth, birth weight, stillbirth or perinatal death, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Conclusions: The core outcome set for the frequency and modality of prenatal visits should be utilized in forthcoming randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. Such application will warrant that in future research, consistent reporting will enrich care and improve outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration number: 2021.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Prenatal Care , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Appointments and Schedules , Consensus , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , United States
2.
J Surg Educ ; 80(10): 1418-1423, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37596104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our Institution instituted curriculum reform in 2013. We sought to examine the impact of rotation order on the end of clerkship National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Subject Exam scores after curriculum restructuring. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of Ob/Gyn NBME scores over 2 years after curriculum reform. At our university, a 15-week block is divided into 5-week intervals of General Surgery, Ob/Gyn, and surgical subspecialties, in any order. During the 16 weeks, students take the NBME Subject Examinations for Ob/Gyn and Surgery. We defined rotation groups by proximity to the shelf exam. Group 1 completed Ob/Gyn first, furthest away from the exam, Group 2 completed Ob/Gyn second, and Group 3 completed Ob/Gyn last, closest to the test. We compared average shelf exam scores between Groups. SETTING: Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences during the clerkship year. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students at the Uniformed Services University. RESULTS: We obtained data from 331 students (118 students in Group 1, 106 in Group 2, and 107 in Group 3). Scores ranged from 55 to 99 (mean 72.5, SD 7.3). Mean (SD) NBME score was 71.9 (6.9) in Group 1, 73.2 (7.2) in Group 2, and 72.6 (7.7) in Group 3 (p = 0.415). CONCLUSION: Rotation order does not affect NBME Ob/Gyn Subject exam scores in a fifteen-week integrated clerkship block.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Gynecology , Obstetrics , Students, Medical , Humans , Gynecology/education , Retrospective Studies , Coroners and Medical Examiners , Obstetrics/education , Curriculum , Educational Measurement
3.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 50(3): 439-455, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500209

ABSTRACT

The one-size-fits-all model of prenatal care has remained largely unchanged since 1930. New models of prenatal care delivery can improve its efficacy, equity, and experience through tailoring prenatal care to meet pregnant people's medical and social needs. Key aspects of recently developed prenatal care models include visit schedules based on needed services, telemedicine, home measurement of routine pregnancy parameters, and interventions that address social and structural drivers of health. Several barriers that affect the individual, provider, health system, and policy levels must be addressed to facilitate implementation of new prenatal care delivery models.


Subject(s)
Prenatal Care , Telemedicine , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Delivery of Health Care
4.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 12: e43962, 2023 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37261946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prenatal care, one of the most common preventive care services in the United States, endeavors to improve pregnancy outcomes through evidence-based screenings and interventions. Despite the prevalence of prenatal care and its importance to maternal and infant health, there are several debates about the best methods of prenatal care delivery, including the most appropriate schedule frequency and content of prenatal visits. Current US national guidelines recommend that low-risk individuals receive a standard schedule of 12 to 14 in-office visits, a care delivery model that has remained unchanged for almost a century. OBJECTIVE: In early 2020, to mitigate individuals' exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, prenatal care providers implemented new paradigms that altered the schedule frequency, interval, and modality (eg, telemedicine) of how prenatal care services were offered. In this paper, we describe the development of a core outcome set (COS) that can be used to evaluate the effect of the frequency of prenatal care schedules on maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: We will systematically review the literature to identify previously reported outcomes important to individuals who receive prenatal care and the people who care for them. Stakeholders with expertise in prenatal care delivery (ie, patients or family members, health care providers, and public health professionals and policy makers) will rate the importance of identified outcomes in a web-based survey using a 3-round Delphi process. A digital consensus meeting will be held for a group of stakeholder representatives to discuss and vote on the outcomes to include in the final COS. RESULTS: The Delphi survey was initiated in July 2022 with invited 71 stakeholders. A digital consensus conference was conducted on October 11, 2022. Data are currently under analysis with plans to submit them in a subsequent manuscript. CONCLUSIONS: More research about the optimal schedule frequency and modality for prenatal care delivery is needed. Standardizing outcomes that are measured and reported in evaluations of the recommended prenatal care schedules will assist evidence synthesis and results reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall, this COS will expand the consistency and patient-centeredness of reported outcomes for various prenatal care delivery schedules and modalities, hopefully improving the overall efficacy of recommended care delivery for pregnant people and their families. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43962.

5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 140(6): 1080, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36441936
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(9): 1305-1309, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914264

ABSTRACT

DESCRIPTION: The Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI), a national coalition of women's health professional organizations and patient advocacy representatives, developed a recommendation for counseling midlife women aged 40 to 60 years with normal or overweight body mass index (BMI; 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2) to maintain weight or limit weight gain to prevent obesity with the long-term goals of optimizing health, function, and well-being. This recommendation is intended to guide clinical practice and coverage of clinical preventive health services for the Health Resources and Services Administration and other stakeholders. Clinicians providing preventive health care to women in primary care settings are the target audience for this recommendation. METHODS: The WPSI developed this recommendation after evaluating results of a systematic review of the effectiveness and harms of interventions to prevent weight gain and obesity in women aged 40 to 60 years without obesity. Seven randomized clinical trials including 51 638 participants and using various counseling and behavioral interventions were included. Trials indicated favorable weight changes with interventions that were statistically significantly different from control groups in 4 of 5 trials of counseling, but not in 2 trials of exercise. Few harms were reported. RECOMMENDATION: The WPSI recommends counseling midlife women aged 40 to 60 years with normal or overweight BMI (18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2) to maintain weight or limit weight gain to prevent obesity. Counseling may include individualized discussion of healthy eating and physical activity.


Subject(s)
Overweight , Preventive Health Services , Female , Humans , Obesity/prevention & control , Overweight/complications , Overweight/prevention & control , Weight Gain , Women's Health
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 31(7): 917-925, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549536

ABSTRACT

Prenatal care is an important preventive service designed to improve the health of pregnant patients and their infants. Prenatal care delivery recommendations have remained unchanged since 1930, when the 12-14 in-person visit schedule was first established to detect preeclampsia. In 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in collaboration with the University of Michigan, convened a panel of maternity care experts to determine new prenatal care delivery recommendations. The panel recognized the need to include emerging evidence and experience, including significant changes in prenatal care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-existing knowledge of the importance of individualized care plans, the promise of telemedicine, and the significant influence of social and structural determinants of health (SSDoH) on pregnancy outcomes. Recommendations were derived using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method, a rigorous e-Delphi method, and are designed to extend beyond the acute public health crisis. The resulting Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in pregnancy (MiPATH) includes recommendations for key aspects of prenatal care delivery: (1) the recommended number of prenatal visits, (2) the frequency of prenatal visits, (3) the role of monitoring routine pregnancy parameters (blood pressure, fetal heart tones, weight, and fundal height), (4) integration of telemedicine into routine care, and (5) inclusion of (SSDoH). Resulting recommendations demonstrate a new approach to prenatal care delivery that incorporates medical, SSDoH, and patient preferences, to develop individualized prenatal care delivery plans. The purpose of this document is to outline the new MiPATH recommendations and to provide practical guidance on implementing them in routine practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maternal Health Services , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Michigan , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/methods
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(6): 946, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794161

Subject(s)
Memory , Sleep , Humans
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(4): 593-602, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe MiPATH (the Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in pregnancy) panel process and key recommendations for prenatal care delivery. METHODS: We conducted an appropriateness study using the RAND Corporation and University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, a modified e-Delphi process, to develop MiPATH recommendations using sequential steps: 1) definition and scope of key terms, 2) literature review and data synthesis, 3) case scenario development, 4) panel selection and scenario revisions, and 5) two rounds of panel appropriateness ratings with deliberation. Recommendations were developed for average-risk pregnant individuals (eg, individuals not requiring care by maternal-fetal medicine specialists). Because prenatal services (eg, laboratory tests, vaccinations) have robust evidence, panelists considered only how services are delivered (eg, visit frequency, telemedicine). RESULTS: The appropriateness of key aspects of prenatal care delivery across individuals with and without common medical and pregnancy complications, as well as social and structural determinants of health, was determined by the panel. Panelists agreed that a risk assessment for medical, social, and structural determinants of health should be completed as soon as individuals present for care. Additionally, the panel provided recommendations for: 1) prenatal visit schedules (care initiation, visit timing and frequency, routine pregnancy assessments), 2) integration of telemedicine (virtual visits and home devices), and 3) care individualization. Panelists recognized significant gaps in existing evidence and the need for policy changes to support equitable care with changing practices. CONCLUSION: The MiPATH recommendations offer more flexible prenatal care delivery for average-risk individuals.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Prenatal Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Michigan , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Social Determinants of Health/standards , Telemedicine/standards , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/standards
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(3): 489-490, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412072
12.
Obstet Gynecol ; 137(2): 376-377, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481515
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(4): 851, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32976372
15.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(3): 634-635, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826584
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(2): 429, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732759

Subject(s)
Nicotiana , Nicotine , Humans , Pregnancy
17.
Ann Intern Med ; 173(1): 48-56, 2020 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510990

ABSTRACT

DESCRIPTION: The Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI), a national coalition of women's health professional organizations and patient representatives, developed a recommendation on screening for anxiety in adolescent and adult women to improve detection; achieve earlier diagnosis and treatment; and improve health, function, and well-being. The WPSI's recommendations are intended to guide clinical practice and coverage of services for the Health Resources and Services Administration and other stakeholders. The target audience for this recommendation includes all clinicians providing preventive health care to women, particularly in primary care settings. This recommendation applies to women and adolescent girls aged 13 years or older who are not currently diagnosed with anxiety disorders, including pregnant and postpartum women. METHODS: The WPSI developed this recommendation after evaluating results of a systematic review of the effectiveness of screening, accuracy of screening instruments, and benefits and harms of treatments in adolescent girls and adult women. No studies directly evaluated the overall effectiveness or harms of screening for anxiety. Twenty-seven screening instruments and their variations were moderately to highly accurate in identifying anxiety (33 individual studies and 2 systematic reviews; 171 studies total). Symptoms improved and relapse rates decreased with psychological therapies (246 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in 5 systematic reviews) and with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (126 RCTs in 3 systematic reviews). The WPSI also considered the effect of screening on symptom progression and identification of associated and underlying conditions, as well as implementation factors. RECOMMENDATION: The WPSI recommends screening for anxiety in women and adolescent girls aged 13 years or older who are not currently diagnosed with anxiety disorders, including pregnant and postpartum women. Optimal screening intervals are unknown, and clinical judgment should be used to determine frequency. When screening suggests the presence of anxiety, further evaluation is necessary to establish the diagnosis and determine appropriate treatment and follow-up.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Mass Screening , Adolescent , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Preventive Health Services , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health
19.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(5): 1230, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332402

Subject(s)
Memory , Vaginitis , Female , Humans
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(3): 465-469, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403594

ABSTRACT

The Well-Woman Chart summarizes current recommendations for preventive health services for women from adolescence and continuing across the lifespan. It was developed by the Women's Preventive Services Initiative, a national collaborative of women's health professional organizations and patient representatives. The Well-Woman Chart includes current clinical guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Bright Futures from the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Women's Preventive Services Initiative that are covered with no cost-sharing for public and most private insurance plans under the prevention service mandate of the Affordable Care Act. The structure of the Well-Woman Chart is based on age intervals and pregnancy status categories that align with existing recommendations. The target audience for the Well-Woman Chart is all clinicians providing preventive health care for women, particularly in primary care settings, and patients affected by the recommendations. The preventive services recommendations apply to females 13 years of age and older and pregnant females of any age. The Well-Woman Chart provides clinical guidance for screening, counseling, and other recommended preventive services for women during health care visits based on age, pregnancy status, and risk factors.


Subject(s)
Preventive Health Services/standards , Women's Health Services/standards , Women's Health/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...