Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 560, 2024 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Developing countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: In cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Data in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Adult , Lebanon/epidemiology , Age Factors , Prognosis , Disease-Free Survival , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Aged , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging
2.
Cancer Med ; 2023 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in initially node-positive patients is still controversial. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of SLNB after NACT and further compare the results between those who were initially node-negative and node-positive. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort that included patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and had surgical management between January 2010 and December 2016. Survival and recurrence data after 3-5 years were collected from patients' records. We divided patients into Group A who were initially node-negative and had SLNB ± axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and Group B who were node-positive and had SLNB ± ALND. RESULTS: Among initially node-negative patients, 43 out of 63 patients did SLNB (Group A). However, among initially node-positive patients only 28 out of 123 patients did SLNB (Group B). Out of the 71 patients who did SLNB after NACT, 26 patients had positive SLNs with only 14 patients who further underwent ALND. The identification rate of SLNB was 100% in Group A and 96.4% in Group B. The survival curves by nodal status showed no significant difference between overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 5 years between patients in Group A versus Group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in properly selected patients, SLNB can be feasible after NACT. Our results resemble the reported literature on accuracy of SLNB after NACT and adds to the growing pool of data on this topic.

3.
Acad Med ; 98(10): 1220-1227, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232854

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To review the literature on health research collaborations by academic entities and to identify the main phases, components, and concepts of these research collaborations. METHOD: The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching 4 databases in March 2022 for studies on health research collaboration between an academic entity (individual, group, or institution) and any other entity included. They excluded non-health-related studies and studies in which collaboration was not for the purpose of research. From included studies, reviewers abstracted data about the 4 main phases of research collaborations (initiation, conduct, monitoring, and evaluation) and synthesized their corresponding components and concepts using thematic analysis method. RESULTS: A total of 59 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies described building research collaborations between an academic entity and other academic entities (n = 29; 49%), communities (n = 28; 47%), industry (n = 7; 12%), and/or governmental entities (n = 4; 7%). Of the 59 studies, 22 addressed 2 phases of collaboration, 20 addressed 3 phases, and 17 addressed all 4 phases. All included studies described at least 1 of the components relevant to the initiation phase and at least 1 relevant to the conduct phase. Team structure was the most common component discussed in relation to the initiation phase (n = 48; 81%), and team dynamics was the most common component discussed in relation to the conduct phase (n = 55; 93%). At least 1 of the components relevant to the monitoring phase was reported in 36 studies, and at least 1 component relevant to the evaluation phase was reported in 28 studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides important information for groups aiming to engage in collaborative research. The synthesized list of collaboration phases and their components can serve as a road map for collaborators at different steps of their research.


Subject(s)
Government , Organizations , Humans
4.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 28(6): 652-659, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32677747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives were to evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly heart failure (HF) patients and the factors associated with the number of PIMs. Secondary objectives were to test for the correlation between PIMs and quality of life (QOL) and depression. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 125 elderly Lebanese HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. Data on socio-demographics, clinical data and medications were collected. Patients were interviewed with Minnesota living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Medication profile per patient was evaluated for PIMs using Beers Criteria. The correlations between the number of PIMs and the MLHFQ, PHQ-9 and the number of medications were tested using Pearson's correlation. Linear regression was done to predict the factors associated with the number of PIMs. KEY FINDINGS: Patients were taking a total of 1035 medications with a mean of 8.28 ± 3.14 medications. In total, 80.0% of patients were taking at least one PIM. Diuretics (55.2%) and proton pump inhibitors (41.6%) were most commonly prescribed PIMs. The number of PIMs was moderately correlated with the number of medications and the MLHFQ score. Linear regression showed that the number of medications, age ≥85 years, chronic kidney disease and HF with New York Heart Association III were associated with more PIMs. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of PIMs was found among a sample of elderly Lebanese HF patients. HF multidisciplinary team is needed to control the prescription of PIMs in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/drug therapy , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lebanon , Male , Stroke Volume , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Heart Lung ; 49(1): 36-41, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679804

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is commonly used to measure quality of life (QOL) in patients with heart failure (HF). We examined the psychometric properties and cultural validity of an Arabic version of the MLHFQ. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted with 210 adult HF outpatients. Patients were interviewed with the Arabic MLHFQ and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. Patients with different NYHA classes and HF-hospitalization histories were compared on QOL to test known-group validity. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis yielded 3 factors: physical, emotional, and social. Three items (4, 8, and 15) had low loadings. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92. There were significant differences in MLHFQ by PHQ-9 categories, NYHA class, and HF-hospitalization history. CONCLUSIONS: This Arabic version of MLHFQ is valid and reliable and can be used in Arabic-speaking Lebanese HF populations.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/psychology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...