Predicting postinfarct ventricular tachycardia by integrating cardiac MRI and advanced computational reentrant pathway analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation can protect against sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. However, improved risk stratification for device requirement is still needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to improve assessment of postinfarct ventricular electropathology and prediction of appropriate ICD therapy by combining late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and advanced computational modeling. METHODS: ADAS 3D LV (ADAS LV Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and custom-made software were used to generate 3-dimensional patient-specific ventricular models in a prospective cohort of patients with a myocardial infarction (N = 40) having undergone LGE imaging before ICD implantation. Corridor metrics and 3-dimensional surface features were computed from LGE images. The Virtual Induction and Treatment of Arrhythmias (VITA) framework was applied to patient-specific models to comprehensively probe the vulnerability of the scar substrate to sustaining reentrant circuits. Imaging and VITA metrics, related to the numbers of induced ventricular tachycardias and their corresponding round trip times (RTTs), were compared with ICD therapy during follow-up. RESULTS: Patients with an event (n = 17) had a larger interface between healthy myocardium and scar and higher VITA metrics. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant independent association with an event: interface (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-5.44; P < .01), unique ventricular tachycardias (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.04-2.68; P = .03), mean RTT (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.11-4.12; P = .02), and maximum RTT (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.19-3.81; P = .01). CONCLUSION: A detailed quantitative analysis of LGE-based scar maps, combined with advanced computational modeling, can accurately predict ICD therapy and could facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Additional coils mitigate elevated defibrillation threshold in right-sided implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator placement: a simulation study.

AIMS: The standard implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator (can) is placed in the left pectoral area; however, in certain circumstances, right-sided cans may be required which may increase defibrillation threshold (DFT) due to suboptimal shock vectors. We aim to quantitatively assess whether the potential increase in DFT of right-sided can configurations may be mitigated by alternate positioning of the right ventricular (RV) shocking coil or adding coils in the superior vena cava (SVC) and coronary sinus (CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of CT-derived torso models was used to assess DFT of ICD configurations with right-sided cans and alternate positioning of RV shock coils. Efficacy changes with additional coils in the SVC and CS were evaluated. A right-sided can with an apical RV shock coil significantly increased DFT compared to a left-sided can [19.5 (16.4, 27.1) J vs. 13.3 (11.7, 19.9) J, P < 0.001]. Septal positioning of the RV coil led to a further DFT increase when using a right-sided can [26.7 (18.1, 36.1) J vs. 19.5 (16.4, 27.1) J, P < 0.001], but not a left-sided can [12.1 (8.1, 17.6) J vs. 13.3 (11.7, 19.9) J, P = 0.099). Defibrillation threshold of a right-sided can with apical or septal coil was reduced the most by adding both SVC and CS coils [19.5 (16.4, 27.1) J vs. 6.6 (3.9, 9.9) J, P < 0.001, and 26.7 (18.1, 36.1) J vs. 12.1 (5.7, 13.5) J, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Right-sided, compared to left-sided, can positioning results in a 50% increase in DFT. For right-sided cans, apical shock coil positioning produces a lower DFT than septal positions. Elevated right-sided can DFTs may be mitigated by utilizing additional coils in SVC and CS.

Machine learning analysis of complex late gadolinium enhancement patterns to improve risk prediction of major arrhythmic events.

Background: Machine learning analysis of complex myocardial scar patterns affords the potential to enhance risk prediction of life-threatening arrhythmia in stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Objective: To assess the utility of computational image analysis, alongside a machine learning (ML) approach, to identify scar microstructure features on late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) that predict major arrhythmic events in patients with CAD. Methods: Patients with stable CAD were prospectively recruited into a CMR registry. Shape-based scar microstructure features characterizing heterogeneous ('peri-infarct') and homogeneous ('core') fibrosis were extracted. An ensemble of machine learning approaches were used for risk stratification, in addition to conventional analysis using Cox modeling. Results: Of 397 patients (mean LVEF 45.4 ± 16.0) followed for a median of 6 years, 55 patients (14%) experienced a major arrhythmic event. When applied within an ML model for binary classification, peri-infarct zone (PIZ) entropy, peri-infarct components and core interface area outperformed a model representative of the current standard of care (LVEF<35% and NYHA>Class I): AUROC (95%CI) 0.81 (0.81-0.82) vs. 0.64 (0.63-0.65), p = 0.002. In multivariate cox regression analysis, these features again remained significant after adjusting for LVEF<35% and NYHA>Class I: PIZ entropy hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-2.56, p < 0.001; number of PIZ components HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.67, p = 0.009; core interface area HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.29-1.99, p = <0.001. Conclusion: Machine learning models using LGE-CMR scar microstructure improved arrhythmic risk stratification as compared to guideline-based clinical parameters; highlighting a potential novel approach to identifying candidates for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in stable CAD.

Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Predicts Sudden Cardiac Death in Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) offers the potential to noninvasively characterize the phenotypic substrate for sudden cardiac death (SCD). OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the utility of infarct characterization by CMR, including scar microstructure analysis, to predict SCD in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Patients with stable CAD were prospectively recruited into a CMR registry. LGE quantification of core infarction and the peri-infarct zone (PIZ) was performed alongside computational image analysis to extract morphologic and texture scar microstructure features. The primary outcome was SCD or aborted SCD. RESULTS: Of 437 patients (mean age: 64 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 47%) followed for a median of 6.3 years, 49 patients (11.2%) experienced the primary outcome. On multivariable analysis, PIZ mass and core infarct mass were independently associated with the primary outcome (per gram: HR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.02-1.12]; P = 0.002 and HR: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05]; P = 0.01, respectively), and the addition of both parameters improved discrimination of the model (Harrell's C-statistic: 0.64-0.79). PIZ mass, however, did not provide incremental prognostic value over core infarct mass based on Harrell's C-statistic or risk reclassification analysis. Severely reduced LVEF did not predict the primary endpoint after adjustment for scar mass. On scar microstructure analysis, the number of LGE islands in addition to scar transmurality, radiality, interface area, and entropy were all associated with the primary outcome after adjustment for severely reduced LVEF and New York Heart Association functional class of >1. No scar microstructure feature remained associated with the primary endpoint when PIZ mass and core infarct mass were added to the regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive LGE characterization independently predicted SCD risk beyond conventional predictors used in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion guidelines. These results signify the potential for a more personalized approach to determining ICD candidacy in CAD.