Effect of documented and undocumented psychiatric conditions on length of stay and discharge destination after total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) and readmissions are quality metrics linked to physician payments and substantially impact the cost of care. This study aims to evaluate the effect of documented and undocumented psychiatric conditions on LOS, discharge location, and readmission following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Retrospective review of all primary, unilateral TKA from 2015 to 2020 at a high-volume, academic orthopedic hospital was conducted. Patients were separated into three cohorts: patients with a documented psychiatric diagnosis (+Dx), patients without a documented psychiatric diagnosis but with an actively prescribed psychiatric medication (-Dx), and patients without a psychiatric diagnosis or medication (control). Patient demographics, LOS, discharge location, and 90 days readmissions were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2935 patients were included; 1051 patients had no recorded psychiatric medications (control); 1884 patients took at least one psychiatric medication, of which 1161 (61.6%) were in the-Dx and 723 (38.4%) were in the +Dx cohort. Operative time (+Dx, 103.4 ± 29.1 and -Dx, 103.1 ± 28.5 vs. 93.6 ± 26.2 min, p < 0.001 for both comparisons) and hospital LOS stay (+ Dx, 3.00 ± 1.70 and -Dx, 3.01 ± 1.83 vs. 2.82 ± 1.40 days, p = 0.021 and p = 0.006, respectively) were greater for patients taking psychiatric medications when compared to the control group. Patients taking psychiatric medication with or without associated diagnosis were significantly more likely to be discharged to a secondary facility-22.8% and 20.9%, respectively-compared to controls, at 12.5% (p < 0.001). Ninety-day readmission rates did not differ between the control and both psychiatric groups (p = 0.693 and p = 0.432, respectively). CONCLUSION: TKA patients taking psychiatric medications with or without a documented psychiatric diagnosis have increased hospital LOS and higher chances of discharge to a secondary facility. Most patients taking psychiatric medication also had no associated diagnosis. Payment models should consider the presence of undocumented psychiatric diagnoses when constructing metrics. Surgeons and institutions should also direct their attention to identifying, recording, and managing these patients to improve outcomes. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Intraoperative technology increases operating room times in primary total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Optimization of patient outcomes and identification of factors to improve the surgical workflow are increasingly important. Operating room time is one modifiable factor that leads to greater hospital efficiency as well as improved outcomes such as shorter length of stay and fewer infections and readmissions. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with operative time disparities in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective review of 7659 consecutive primary TKA cases was conducted. Patient demographic data, discrete operating room (OR) times, use of technology (i.e. robotic-assisted surgery, computer navigation), surgeon experience and the level of training of the first assistant were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the effect of hospital characteristics on operative times. Operative times of five minutes or greater were considered to be clinically significant. RESULTS: While the use of technology (182.64 ± 39.85 vs 158.70 ± 37.45 min; B = 26.09; p < 0.0001) and greater surgeon experience (162.14 ± 39.87 vs 158.69 ± 33.18 min, B = 3.15, p = 0.002) were found to increase OR times, level of training of the first assist (161.65 vs 156.4 min; Β = - 0.264; p = 0.487) did not. Of the discrete OR times examined, incision time and total time under anesthesia were negatively impacted by the use of technology. CONCLUSION: Use of technology was the only study variable found to significantly increase OR times. With increased operative times and limited evidence that technology improves long-term patient outcomes, surgeons should carefully consider the benefits and cost of technology in TKA.

The effects of tourniquet on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening is a common cause of implant failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cement penetration depth is a known factor that determines an implant's "strength" and plays an important role in preventing aseptic loosening. Tourniquet use is thought to facilitate cement penetration, but its use has mixed reviews. The aim of this study was to compare cement penetration depth between tourniquet and tourniquet-less TKA patients. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review was conducted. Patients were randomized preoperatively to undergo TKA with or without the use of an intraoperative tourniquet. The variables collected were cement penetration measurements in millimeters (mm) within a 1-month post-operative period, length of stay (LOS), and baseline demographics. Measurements were taken by two independent raters and made in accordance to the zones described by the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System and methodology used in previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 357 TKA patients were studied. No demographic differences were found between tourniquet (n = 189) and tourniquet-less (n = 168) cohorts. However, the tourniquet cohort had statistically, but not clinically, greater average cement penetration depth [2.4 ± 0.6 mm (range 1.2-4.1 mm) vs. 2.2 ± 0.5 mm (range 1.0-4.3 mm, p = 0.01)]. Moreover, the tourniquet cohort had a significantly greater proportion of patients with an average penetration depth within the accepted zone of 2 mm or greater (78.9% vs. 67.3%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Tourniquet use does not affect average penetration depth but increases the likelihood of achieving optimal cement penetration depth. Further study is warranted to determine whether this increased likelihood of optimal cement penetration depth yields lower revision rates.

Bipolar Sealers and Tourniquet Use Have Similar Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction: The use of tourniquets and bipolar sealers are effective methods of hemostasis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, their effect on perioperative patient outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of tourniquet-less, tourniquet-less with use of a bipolar sealer, and tourniquet use on postoperative pain and surgical outcomes following TKA. Methods: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 120 primary TKA cases was conducted at an urban academic hospital. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents). Demographics, length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, and change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (ΔKOOS) were also collected. Patients were divided into cohorts based on the use of tourniquet-less with bipolar sealer (TRLB) (n = 40), tourniquet (TR) (n = 40), or tourniquet-less (TRL) (n = 40). Results: There were no differences in demographic data between each cohort. TRLB, TR and TRL had similar LOS (2.68 ± 1.63 vs 2.29 ± 1.27 vs 2.36 ± 1.42 days; p = 0.472) and VAS pain score on postoperative day 1 (4.68 vs 3.74 vs 3.63; p = 0.209). There were also no differences in opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.903), 1 month (p = 0.973), 3 months (p = 0.983), or 5 months (p = 0.983) post-operatively. TRLB and TR had comparable improvement in ΔKOOS from baseline to 12 weeks post-operatively (Δ16.58 ± 8.47 vs Δ23.92 ± 14.60; p = 0.254). Compared to the ΔKOOS of TRL (Δ5.19 ± 2.59), TRLB and TR had clinically and statistically greater ΔKOOS improvements (p = 0.009; p = 0.001). The TRL cohort also had a higher readmission rate than TRLB and TR (15% vs 0% vs 5%, p = 0.025). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that both bipolar sealer and tourniquet use in TKA are associated with similar postoperative pain levels and LOS in comparison to tourniquet-less only TKA. However, bipolar sealer and tourniquet use may lead to better longer term improvement such as greater PRO score improvement and fewer readmissions.

Low-Dose Aspirin is Safe and Effective for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are rare, but serious complications of total joint replacement affect patients and health care systems due to the morbidity, mortality, and associated cost of its complications. There is currently no established universal standard of care for prophylaxis against VTE in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether a protocol of 81-mg aspirin (ASA) bis in die (BID) is safe and/or sufficient in preventing VTE in patients undergoing rTKAs versus 325-mg ASA BID. In 2017, our institution adopted a new protocol for VTE prophylaxis for arthroplasty patients. Patients initially received 325-mg ASA BID for 1 month and then changed to a lower dose of 81-mg BID. A retrospective review from 2011 to 2019 was conducted identifying 1,438 consecutive rTKA patients and 90-day postoperative outcomes including VTE, gastrointestinal, and wound bleeding complications, acute periprosthetic joint infection, and mortality. In the 74 months prior to protocol implementation, 1,003 rTKAs were performed and nine VTE cases were diagnosed (0.90%). After 26 months of the protocol change, 435 rTKAs were performed with one VTE case identified (0.23%). There was no significant difference in rates or odds in postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE; p = 0.27), DVT (p = 0.35), and total VTE rates (p = 0.16) among patients using either protocol. There were also no differences in bleeding complications (p = 0.15) or infection rate (p = 0.36). No mortalities were observed. In the conclusion, 81-mg ASA BID is noninferior to 325-mg ASA BID in maintaining low rates of VTE and may be safe for use in patients undergoing rTKA.

Tranexamic Acid Is Safe in Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is increasingly used to minimize blood loss during total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although TXA has been shown to be highly effective in reducing operative blood loss, many surgeons believe that it places patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or a history of coronary stents at an increased risk for myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine if TXA is safe to use in patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis at a single, tertiary academic medical center identifying consecutive total hip and knee arthroplasty cases over an 8-year period. From this cohort who received TXA intraoperatively, we identified patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents and determined the total myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates within a 90-day postoperative period. Chi-square analyses were used to identify differences in VTE rates between cohorts. A post hoc power analysis was also performed to determine whether our results were powered to detect a difference in VTE rates. RESULTS: In the 26,808 identified at-risk patients, there were no postoperative myocardial infarctions. No significant differences were observed for VTE rates compared with the control cohort using either topical or intravenous TXA, with regard to CAD (0.29% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.09) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.14). Moreover, there was no significant difference observed in VTE rates when administration was subcategorized into intravenous and topical methods with regard to CAD (0.13% compared with 0.72%; p = 0.12) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0%; p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, topical and intravenous TXA were equally safe when used in patients with a history of CAD and coronary stents in comparison with the control cohort. With equal efficacy and risk of adverse events, we recommend intravenous TXA, which may enable easier institutional implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common practice which may improve visualization of the surgical field and reduce blood loss. However, the safety and efficacy associated with tourniquet use continues to be a subject of debate among orthopedic surgeons. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of tourniquet use on pain and opioid consumption after TKA. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial among patients undergoing TKA. Patients were preoperatively randomized to undergo TKA with or without the use of an intraoperative tourniquet. Frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations were used to describe baseline patient demographics (age, gender, race, body mass index, smoking status), length of stay, surgical factors, visual analog scale pain scores, and opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were included in this study, with 166 patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet and 161 patients with a tourniquet. A statistically significant difference was found in surgical time (97.87 vs 92.98 minutes; P = .05), whereas none was found for length of stay (1.73 vs 1.70 days; P = .87), postop visual analog scale pain scores (1.73 vs 1.70; P = .87), inpatient opioid consumption (19.84 vs 19.27 morphine milligram equivalents; P = .74), or outpatient opioid consumption between the tourniquet-less and tourniquet cohorts, respectively. There were no readmissions in either cohort during the 90-day episode of care. CONCLUSION: Utilization of a tourniquet during TKA has minimal impact on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption when compared with patients who underwent TKA without a tourniquet.

Do preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid injections affect time to total joint arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid (HAI) injections alleviate symptoms of osteoarthritis in patients who may be candidates for total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). However, their effect on time to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and complications remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate (1) delay in time to surgery for patients receiving injections prior to THA/TKA (2) incidence of patients that receive injections, (3) type and number of injections, and (4) compare complication rates between patients with and without injections. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3340 consecutive TJA (1770 THA and 1570 TKA). Patients were divided into two cohorts depending if they received preoperative intra-articular injection or not. We identified dates of first clinic presentation and index surgery, injection type, total administered, and 90-day complications, including periprosthetic joint infection. RESULTS: 150/1770 THA and 192/1570 TKA patients received injections (8.5%vs.12.2%,p = 0.0004). Time from first presentation to clinic to TJA was significantly greater in patients receiving injections [12.4 ± 11 months vs.7.3 ± 10.7,p < 0.001 for THA; 20.0 ± 17.4 months vs.11.6 ± 15.4,p < 0.001 for TKA]. This delay in time was greater in TKA versus THA (8.4 months vs.5.1,p < 0.001). TKA patients had a higher incidence of receiving HAI versus THA patients (9%vs.0.6%,p < 0.0001). There were no differences in overall complication profiles (p = 0.19 for THA, p = 0.3 for TKA). CONCLUSION: Injections are associated with an increased time to TJA by a statistically significant amount, however its clinical significance is debatable. Injections are safe if administered at least three months preoperatively. If patients present with appropriate surgical indications and are ready, we do not recommend intra-articular injections to delay surgery.

In a Bundled Payment Model, the Costs Associated With Total Joint Replacement in Those Aged Older Than 80 Years Are Significantly Greater.

BACKGROUND: The number of octogenarians requiring a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and/or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will rise disproportionally in the coming decade. Although outcomes are comparable with younger patients, management of these older patients involves higher medical complexity at a greater expense to the hospital system. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of care for primary THA and TKA in our bundled care patients aged ≥80 years to those aged 65-80 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of primary TKA (n = 641) and THA (n = 1225) cases from 2013 to 2017 was performed. Patient demographic and admission cost data were collected. Patients were grouped based on surgery type (ie, elective or nonelective THA/TKA) and age group (ie, older [≥80 years old] or younger [65-80 years old]). Multivariate regression analyses were used to account for demographic differences. RESULTS: Elective primary THA in the older cohort (n = 157) cost 24.5% more than the younger cohort (n = 1025) (P < .0001). Elective primary TKA cases in the older cohort (n = 87) cost 17.0% more than the younger cohort's (n = 554) (P < .0001). For nonelective THA cases, the older cohort's (n = 29) episodes cost 39.1% more than the younger cohort (n = 14) (P < .0001). When comparing the <80 elective THA cohort (n = 1025) to the ≥90 cohort (n = 10), the cost difference swelled to 58.7% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although primary THA and TKA in ≥80-year-old patients yield similar outcomes, this study demonstrates that the additional measures required to care for older patients and ensure successful outcomes cost significantly more. Consideration should be given to age as a factor in determining reimbursement in a bundled payment system to reduce the incentive to restrict care to elderly patients.