ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 119 consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy. The endovaginal US scans and MR images were interpreted independently in a double-blind fashion. Imaging findings were compared with those at histopathologic examination. RESULTS: At histopathologic examination, adenomyosis was found in 28 of the 119 patients (24%). Sensitivity and specificity was 89% for endovaginal US and 89% for MR imaging. The positive predictive value was 71% for US and 65% for MR imaging. The negative predictive value was 96% for US and 95% for MR imaging. There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivities (P = .65) and specificities (P = .75) of endovaginal US and MR imaging. The mean junctional zone (JZ) thickness on MR images in patients with and without proved adenomyosis was 15.0 mm +/- 4.9 and 7.7 mm +/- 3.3, respectively (P < .0001). When receiver operating characteristic curves were applied retrospectively, the optimal JZ value for the diagnosis of adenomyosis with MR imaging was > or = 12 mm. CONCLUSION: Endovaginal US was as accurate as MR imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Use of a JZ thickness of > or= 12 mm should further optimize the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/diagnosis , Uterine Diseases/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Logistic Models , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Middle Aged , Myometrium/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography/methods , Uterine Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Diseases/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis and to evaluate the frequency of observed sonographic criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovaginal US was performed in 100 consecutive women undergoing hysterectomy for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Adenomyosis was diagnosed when a poorly defined area of abnormal echotexture (decreased or increased echogenicity, heterogeneous echotexture, myometrial cysts) was present in the myometrium. All endovaginal US findings were correlated with those from histologic examination. RESULTS: Endovaginal US depicted 25 of 29 pathologically proved cases of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was correctly ruled out in 61 of 71 patients. Endovaginal US had a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 86%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 71% and 94%, respectively. Of the 25 patients with true-positive findings at US, the myometrium demonstrated heterogeneous and hypoechoic areas with or without the presence of cysts in 21 (84%) patients, hypoechoic areas with cysts in three (12%) patients, and heterogeneous areas within the myometrium in one (4%) patient. CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis of the uterus can be accurately diagnosed with endovaginal US with use of specific sonographic criteria.
