Oral recipient site infections in reconstructive surgery - impact of the graft itself and the perioperative antibiosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the influence of peri/post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (POABP) and the reconstructive graft itself on recipient sites infections in head and neck surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 322 consecutive patients with reconstructive surgery were investigated. The primary objective was to analyze the differences of commonly applied reconstructive grafts on the occurrence of oral recipient site infections. Moreover, differences of POABP regimes (namely: ampicillin/sulbactam, 2nd generation cephalosporins, clindamycin) and antibiotic alternatives were investigated. In addition, patients' length of in-hospital stay was analyzed in regard to reconstructive graft and POABP regime. RESULTS: The free radial forearm flap and split-thickness skin graft presented significantly less recipient site infections and shorter length of in-hospital stays (LOS) in comparison to further six reconstructive technique with pedicled tissue transfer or bone transfers. LOS was significantly shorter for patients with ampicillin/sulbactam than with 2nd generation cephalosporins as POABP. 91% of the harvested pathogens (n=193) were susceptible to the combination of 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins. Secondly, 92 out 113 (81%) harvested pathogens presented susceptibility to moxifloxacin. CONCLUSION: Smaller tissue transfers are less prone to infections of the recipient site and present low LOS. For an POABP regime, the combination of 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins presents substantial results in recipient site infections. In cases of allergy, potential pathogens show adequate susceptibility to moxifloxacin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A combination of 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins may be used to prevent recipient sites in head and neck surgery.

Prevention and management of bacterial infections of the donor site of flaps raised for reconstruction in head and neck surgery.

PURPOSE: In the field of reconstructive head and neck surgery, surgical site infections (SSI) are commonly investigated for the recipient site of various reconstructive procedures. Data about SSI of the donor site of different flaps raised for reconstruction are rare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With regard to the bacterial donor site infections, we retrospectively investigated the medical data, surgical reports and wound management protocols of 267 patients who received reconstruction of the head and neck after ablative surgery. All patients underwent reconstruction with one of the following flaps: free fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap (RFFF), free fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap (ALTFF), pedicled myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap (PLDF), pedicled myocutaneous pectoralis major flap (PPMF), free osteocutaneous fibula flap (FFF). Follow-up was conducted for 12 months. RESULTS: The lowest detection ratio (DR: number of infected sites/flaps raised from the respective donor site) was calculated for the radial forearm, 0.087. Pedicled flaps presented a moderate DR (PLDF: 0.27, PMMF:0.35). Donor sites of the leg possessed the highest DR (ALTFF:0.61, FFF: 045). Mainly gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacteria (n = 41) were detected and gram-negative bacteria (aerobe/anaerobe) were present in 27 cases. The most frequently detected bacteria were Staphylococcus spp., Viridans Streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escheria coli. Continuous wound management for in-hospital patients was able to prevent any local spreading or a prolonged length of in-hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Overall, gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus spp., are the predominant bacteria detected in donor site wounds. For wound care management, an infection with gram-negative pathogens should not be neglected.