Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Inj Prev ; 21(6): 434-40, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26609059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standardized methodologies for assessing economic burden of injury at the national or international level do not exist. OBJECTIVE: To measure national incidence, medical costs, and productivity losses of medically treated injuries using the most recent data available in the United States, as a case study for similarly developed countries undertaking economic burden analyses. METHOD: The authors combined several data sets to estimate the incidence of fatal and non-fatal injuries in 2000. They computed unit medical and productivity costs and multiplied these costs by corresponding incidence estimates to yield total lifetime costs of injuries occurring in 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, medical costs, productivity losses, and total costs for injuries stratified by age group, sex, and mechanism. RESULTS: More than 50 million Americans experienced a medically treated injury in 2000, resulting in lifetime costs of $406 billion; $80 billion for medical treatment and $326 billion for lost productivity. Males had a 20% higher rate of injury than females. Injuries resulting from falls or being struck by/against an object accounted for more than 44% of injuries. The rate of medically treated injuries declined by 15% from 1985 to 2000 in the US. For those aged 0-44, the incidence rate of injuries declined by more than 20%; while persons aged 75 and older experienced a 20% increase. CONCLUSIONS: These national burden estimates provide unequivocal evidence of the large health and financial burden of injuries. This study can serve as a template for other countries or be used in intercountry comparisons.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18184493

ABSTRACT

This study finds that the break-even point for child safety seat misuse reduction programs and vehicle and seat design improvements is dollars 121 a year per child seat in use, annual misuse reduction program cost is dollars 6, and Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) cost dollars 13 annually per seat in use (in 2004 dollars). To estimate societal injury cost savings we compared tow-away crash outcomes for children ages 0-4, traveling in child seats in the back of passenger vehicles in 1984-1986 vs. 1999-2005. Both injury frequency and severity were compared and entered into the calculation of mean injury costs. To analyze the economic benefits of child safety seat misuse reduction programs and vehicle and seat design improvements for children sitting in rear seats of passenger vehicles, we compared outcomes of tow-away crashes for children ages 0-4 traveling in a child safety seat in two different multi-year time periods: 1984-1986 and 1999-2005. We chose 1984-1986 as a baseline as those years featured large, high-quality samples of crash data during the time period before the ongoing misuse of child seats was recognized as a public policy problem. By the early 1990s, misuse was a policy issue and misuse reduction programs were springing up.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/economics , Infant Equipment/economics , Safety/economics , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design/economics , Female , Humans , Illinois , Infant , Infant Equipment/standards , Infant Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Program Development , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Safety/standards , Texas , United States
3.
Inj Prev ; 12(4): 212-8, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16887941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standardized methodologies for assessing economic burden of injury at the national or international level do not exist. OBJECTIVE: To measure national incidence, medical costs, and productivity losses of medically treated injuries using the most recent data available in the United States, as a case study for similarly developed countries undertaking economic burden analyses. METHOD: The authors combined several data sets to estimate the incidence of fatal and non-fatal injuries in 2000. They computed unit medical and productivity costs and multiplied these costs by corresponding incidence estimates to yield total lifetime costs of injuries occurring in 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, medical costs, productivity losses, and total costs for injuries stratified by age group, sex, and mechanism. RESULTS: More than 50 million Americans experienced a medically treated injury in 2000, resulting in lifetime costs of 406 billion dollars; 80 billion dollars for medical treatment and 326 billion dollars for lost productivity. Males had a 20% higher rate of injury than females. Injuries resulting from falls or being struck by/against an object accounted for more than 44% of injuries. The rate of medically treated injuries declined by 15% from 1985 to 2000 in the US. For those aged 0-44, the incidence rate of injuries declined by more than 20%; while persons aged 75 and older experienced a 20% increase. CONCLUSIONS: These national burden estimates provide unequivocal evidence of the large health and financial burden of injuries. This study can serve as a template for other countries or be used in intercountry comparisons.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
4.
Inj Prev ; 10(6): 338-43, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15583254

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare availability, urban price, and affordability of child/family safety devices between 18 economically diverse countries. DESIGN: Descriptive: urban price surveys by local safety organisations or shoppers. SETTING: Retail stores and internet vendors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prices expressed in US dollars, and affordability measured by hours of factory work needed to buy a child safety seat, a belt-positioning booster seat, a child bicycle helmet, and a smoke alarm. RESULTS: Prices of child and family safety devices varied widely between countries but the variation for child safety seats and bicycle helmets did not relate strongly to country income. Safety devices were expensive, often prohibitively so, in lower income countries. Far more hours of factory work were required to earn a child safety device in lower income than middle income, and middle income than higher income, countries. A bicycle helmet, for example, cost 10 hours of factory work in lower income countries but less than an hour in higher income countries. Smoke alarms and booster seats were not available in many lower income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Bicycles and two-axle motor vehicles were numerous in lower and middle income countries, but corresponding child safety devices were often unaffordable and sometimes not readily available. The apparent market distortions and their causes merit investigation. Advocacy, social marketing, local device production, lowering of tariffs, and mandatory use legislation might stimulate market growth. Arguably, a moral obligation exists to offer subsidies that give all children a fair chance of surviving to adulthood.


Subject(s)
Protective Devices/economics , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Head Protective Devices/economics , Head Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Humans , Income , Infant , Infant Equipment/economics , Infant Equipment/supply & distribution , Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Seat Belts/economics , Seat Belts/supply & distribution , Smoke
5.
Accid Anal Prev ; 35(6): 941-8, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12971929

ABSTRACT

This study addresses of the impacts of emergency vehicle (ambulances, police cars and fire trucks) occupant seating position, restraint use and vehicle response status on injuries and fatalities. Multi-way frequency and ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed on two large national databases, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the General Estimates System (GES). One model estimated the relative risk ratios for different levels of injury severity to occupants traveling in ambulances. Restrained ambulance occupants involved in a crash were significantly less likely to be killed or seriously injured than unrestrained occupants. Ambulance rear occupants were significantly more likely to be killed than front-seat occupants. Ambulance occupants traveling non-emergency were more likely than occupants traveling emergency to be killed or severely injured. Unrestrained ambulance occupants, occupants riding in the patient compartment and especially unrestrained occupants riding in the patient compartment were at substantially increased risk of injury and death when involved in a crash. A second model incorporated police cars and fire trucks. In the combined ambulance-fire truck-police car model, the likelihood of an occupant fatality for those involved in a crash was higher for routine responses. Relative to police cars and fire trucks, ambulances experienced the highest percentage of fatal crashes where occupants are killed and the highest percentage of crashes where occupants are injured. Lack of restraint use and/or responding with 'lights and siren' characterized the vast majority of fatalities among fire truck occupants. A third model incorporated non-special use van and passenger car occupants, which otherwise replicated the second model. Our findings suggest that ambulance crewmembers riding in the back and firefighters in any seating position, should be restrained whenever feasible. Family members accompanying ambulance patients should ride in the front-seat of the ambulance.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Ambulances , Motor Vehicles , Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Motor Vehicles/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12214348

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the most detailed and current costs per US motor vehicle crash victim. These unit costs, which include the first keyed to AIS90, are reported by category, body part, whether a fracture/dislocation was involved, and MAIS. This level of detail allows for reliable analyses of interventions targeting narrow ranges of injuries and, hopefully, for the development of a biomechanical injury cost model.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Fractures, Bone/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Joint Dislocations/economics , United States
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11558093

ABSTRACT

This paper presents cost-outcome analyses of four transportation injury prevention efforts in Native American jurisdictions. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed to estimate projects' impact on injury reduction. Projects' costs were amortized over the time period covered by the evaluation or over the useful life of physical capital invested. Projects' savings were calculated based on estimated reduction in medical and public program expenses, on estimated decrease in lost productivity, and on estimated quality adjusted life years saved. All four projects yielded positive benefit-cost ratios. The net cost per quality adjusted life years was less than zero for all the projects.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/economics , Indians, North American , Safety/economics , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Alaska , Cause of Death , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...