Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(8): 1425-1433, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840805

ABSTRACT

The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and venous thrombotic disorders is still unclear. We assessed the association between COVID-19 infection-related pneumonia and proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in a cohort of patients admitted to our hospital during the European outbreak in the front line of Cremona, Lombardy. In a single-center cross-sectional study, all patients hospitalized for more than 5 days in Internal Medicine Department with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia received 2-point compressive ultrasound assessment (CUS) of the leg vein system during a single day. Ninety-four percent of patients received enoxaparin as standard pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. The presence of DVT was defined as incompressibility of popliteal or common femoral vein. Out of 121 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (mean age 71.8, 66.3% males) hospitalized on March 31st, 70 stayed in hospital for over 5 days and 66 of them underwent CUS of deep venous system of the legs. The presence of asymptomatic DVT was found in 9 patients (13.6%). No symptomatic DVT was found. Patients with DVT showed mean age = 75.7 years, mean D-dimer levels = 4.02 ng/ml and all of them received enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis, except one. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram confirmed pulmonary embolism in five patients. One every seven patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia, hospitalized for more than 5 days, had asymptomatic proximal DVT and half of them had confirmed PE despite standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. This observational study suggests the need of an active surveillance through CUS in patients hospitalized with acute SARS-COV-2 and underline the need of a more intense thromboprophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asymptomatic Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prevalence , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/physiopathology
2.
Thromb Res ; 175: 61-67, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30721819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High inter-individual variability of the anticoagulant plasma levels of the first three direct oral anticoagulants was previously reported. Aims of the present study were to evaluate edoxaban inter and intra-individual variability in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation and to assess correlation between edoxaban plasma levels and coagulation screening test and renal function. METHODS: From January 31st 2017 to June 30th 2018, a total of 101 NVAF patients were enrolled: 48 patients were on edoxaban 60 mg and 53 on edoxaban 30 mg, once daily. Blood samples were taken at C-trough and at C-peak within the first month (15-25 days) of treatment and then at C-trough each three months. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), specific anti-FXa chromogenic test were performed. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Mean inter-individual variability expressed as overall coefficient of variation (CV%) values was lower at C-peak (CV% = 49) than at C-trough (CV% = 68). Mean CV% intra-individual variability was 26.5. No significant correlation was found between edoxaban plasma levels and CrCl (C-trough r/r2 = -0.007/0.000; C-peak r/r2 = 0.129/0.017). Correlations (r/r2), at C-trough and C-peak, between edoxaban levels and PT and aPTT, were 0.386/0.149-0.922/0.851 and 0.283/0.080-0.567/0.321, respectively. Significant discrepancies between PT or aPTT and edoxaban levels were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms also for edoxaban a high inter-individual variability in NVAF patients. PT and aPTT are not useful to measure this drug. As for the other two anti-FXa drugs, the absence of a significant correlation between CrCl and edoxaban plasma levels was observed.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Kidney Function Tests/methods , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pyridines/pharmacology , Thiazoles/pharmacology
3.
Thrombosis ; 2012: 835356, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23097696

ABSTRACT

Anticoagulation Clinics (ACs) are services specialized in management of patients on anticoagulant treatment. At present, ACs manage patients chiefly on antivitamin K antagonists (AVKs), but patient population has already changed in the last few years, because of an increase of treatments with other anticoagulant drugs, which require different management systems. The strong increase in the number of patients at AC, mainly on long-term treatment, has determined the development of web management, through telemedicine systems, improving the quality of life and maintaining the same clinical quality levels. New oral anticoagulants (NOAs) have shown to be as effective as AVK antagonists in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism in addition to VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery, when administered at a fixed dose, but patient adherence and compliance are crucial for good quality treatment. At present, lacking data from the real world, an oversimplification of treatment with NOAs could cause unjustified risks for patients and also a possible future underuse of good drugs. For these reasons the vigilance must be high and ACs can have a crucial role in defining which is the best management for NOA patients and how to do it, as it happened for AVKs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL