ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fasting before coronary procedures is currently recommended to reduce complications despite the lack of scientific evidence. OBJECTIVES: The TONIC (Comparison Between Fasting and No Fasting Before Interventional Coronary Intervention on the Occurrence of Adverse Events) noninferiority trial investigated the safety and comfort of a nonfasting strategy (ad libitum food and drinks) vs traditional fasting (>6 hours for solid food and liquids) before coronary procedures. METHODS: In this monocentric, prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 739 patients undergoing coronary procedures were included and randomized to a fasting or a nonfasting strategy. Emergency procedures were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of vasovagal reaction, hypoglycemia (defined by blood sugar ≤0.7 g/L), and isolated nausea and/or vomiting. Noninferiority margin was 4%. Secondary endpoints were contrast-induced nephropathy and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Among the 739 procedures (697 elective and 42 semiurgent), 517 angiographies, and 222 angioplasties (including complex and high-risk procedures) were performed. The primary endpoint occurred in 30 of 365 nonfasting patients (8.2%) vs 37 of 374 fasting patients (9.9%), demonstrating noninferiority (absolute between-group difference, -1.7%; 1-sided 95% CI upper limit: 1.8%). No food-related adverse event occurred, and contrast-related acute kidney injuries were similar between groups. Overall, procedure satisfaction and perceived pain were similar in both groups, but nonfasting patients reported less hunger and thirst (P < 0.01). In case of redo coronary procedures, most patients (79%) would choose a nonfasting strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The TONIC randomized trial demonstrates the noninferiority of a nonfasting strategy to the usual fasting strategy for coronary procedures regarding safety, while improving patients' comfort.
