Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mod Pathol ; 31(3): 474-487, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29052596

ABSTRACT

Renal cell carcinomas with t(6;11) chromosome translocation involving the TFEB gene are indolent neoplasms which often occur in young patients. In this study, we report seven cases of renal cell carcinoma with TFEB rearrangement, two of whom had histologically proven metastasis. Patients (4F, 3M) ranged in age from 19 to 55 years (mean 37). One patient developed paratracheal and pleural metastases 24 months after surgery and died of disease after 46 months; another one recurred with neoplastic nodules in the perinephric fat and pelvic soft tissue. Histologically, either cytological or architectural appearance was peculiar in each case whereas one tumor displayed the typical biphasic morphology. By immunohistochemistry, all tumors labelled for cathepsin K, Melan-A and CD68 (KP1 clone). HMB45 and PAX8 staining were detected in six of seven tumors. All tumors were negative for CD68 (PG-M1 clone), CKAE1-AE3, CK7, CAIX, and AMACR. Seven pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipomas, used as control, were positive for cathepsin K, melanocytic markers, and CD68 (PG-M1 and KP1) and negative for PAX8. Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed the presence of TFEB gene translocation in all t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas with a high frequency of split TFEB fluorescent signals (mean 74%). In the primary and metastatic samples of the two aggressive tumors, increased gene copy number was observed (3-5 fluorescent signals per neoplastic nuclei) with a concomitant increased number of CEP6. Review of the literature revealed older age and larger tumor size as correlating with aggressive behavior in these neoplasms. In conclusion, we present the clinical, morphological and molecular features of seven t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas, two with histologically demonstrated metastasis. We report the high frequency of split signals by FISH in tumors with t(6;11) chromosomal rearrangement and the occurrence of TFEB gene copy number gains in the aggressive cases, analyzing either the primary or metastatic tumor. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of CD68 (PG-M1) immunohistochemical staining in distinguishing t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma from pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/analysis , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/chemistry , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Kidney Neoplasms/chemistry , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Angiomyolipoma/chemistry , Angiomyolipoma/pathology , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6/genetics , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms/chemistry , Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms/pathology , Translocation, Genetic
2.
Adv Anat Pathol ; 24(3): 151-160, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398953

ABSTRACT

S100P, or placental S100, is a member of a large family of S100 proteins and considered to be a promising immunohistochemical marker to support urothelial differentiation. This review synthesizes published data regarding the expression of S100P in urothelial carcinoma across histological grade and variant patterns, and in other malignancies, in an effort to summarize the state of understanding of this marker and evaluate its potential. We provide also a broad comparison of S100P with other contemporary and traditional urothelial markers and outline the potential utility of S100P in various diagnostically challenging scenarios. Taken in context, we recommend that to provide immunohistochemical support for consideration of urothelial differentiation, S100P may be included in a panel of markers (due to its high sensitivity), with better established (GATA3) and more specific (uroplakin 2) markers, for comparison with corresponding markers of other primary sites under consideration, depending on the clinical context. We emphasize that the overall most appropriate panel for any given case depends on the differential diagnosis engendered by the morphology encountered, and the constellation of clinical findings. As always with immunohistochemical panels, expected positive and negative markers for each diagnostic consideration should be included. Finally, since as of date there are no optimally sensitive or specific markers of urothelial differentiation, all final diagnoses relying on immunohistochemical support should be made in the appropriate clinical and histological context.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Urothelium/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolism , Urologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urologic Neoplasms/metabolism
3.
Semin Diagn Pathol ; 32(2): 140-59, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25804448

ABSTRACT

PEComas are mesenchymal tumors composed of histologically and immunohistochemically distinctive perivascular epithelioid cells that are characterized by the coexpression of muscle and melanogenetic markers. This group of lesions includes angiomyolipoma, clear cell "sugar" tumor of the lung and extrapulmonary sites, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, clear cell myomelanocytic tumor of the falciform ligament/ligamentum teres, and rare clear cell tumors of other anatomical sites. In the genitourinary tract, PEComas have been described in the kidney, bladder, prostate, testis, and urethra. Although most PEComas behave as benign tumors, some are potentially malignant, and criteria for malignancy have been suggested for both and renal and extrarenal lesions. Recently, the expression of cathepsin K has been demonstrated in a large number of PEComas and has been proposed as a relatively specific marker to distinguish these proliferations from the majority of human cancers. In addition, a distinctive subset of PEComas harboring TFE3 gene fusions has been reported, giving rise to a possible relationship between them and MiTF/TFE family translocation renal cell carcinomas. The genetic alterations of tuberous sclerosis complex that promote activation of the mTOR pathway have been identified in PEComas. Therapy with mTORC1 inhibitors has been shown to be effective in some cases.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms/pathology , Urogenital Neoplasms/pathology , Humans
4.
Am J Cancer Res ; 4(6): 907-15, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25520878

ABSTRACT

Since target therapy with mTOR inhibitors plays an important role in the current management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), there is an increasing demand for predictive biomarkers, which may help to select patients that are most likely to benefit from personalized treatment. When dealing with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer tissue specimens, several techniques may be used to identify potential molecular markers, yielding different outcome in terms of accuracy. We sought to investigate and compare the capability of three main techniques to detect molecules performing an active function in mTOR pathway in RCC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Western blot (WB) and immunofluorescence (IF) analyses were performed on FFPE RCC tissue specimens from 16 patients by using the following mTOR pathway-related: mTOR (Ser235/236), phospho-mTOR (p-mTOR/Ser2448), phospho-p70S6k (p-p70S6k/Thr389), both monoclonal and polyclonal, phospho-S6Rb (p-S6Rb) and phospho-4EBP1 (p-4EBP1/Thr37/46). No single molecule was simultaneously revealed by all three techniques. Only p-p70S6k was detected by two methods (IHC and IF) using a monoclonal antibody. The other molecules were detected exclusively by one technique, as follows: p-mTOR and polyclonal p-p70S6K by IHC, p70S6K, p-S6Rb and p-4EBP1 by WB, and, finally, mTOR by IF. We found significant differences in detecting mTOR pathway-related active biomarkers by using three common techniques such as IHC, WB and IF on RCC samples. Such results have important implications in terms of predictive biomarker testing, and need to be related to clinical end-points such as responsiveness to targeted drugs by prospective studies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...