Primary Anal Cancer Screening Results From 381 Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

BACKGROUND: Women with human immunodeficiency virus (WWH) have an elevated risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anal cancer. Primary anal cancer screening results from this population could inform practice guidelines. METHODS: In total, 381 WWH with anal cytology screening, high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing and genital (cervical or vaginal) cotesting within 6 months were identified during 2012-2019. Those with anal cytology of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or worse underwent high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy. Independent predictors of anal hrHPV, HPV16, and histological anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (aHSIL) were identified using adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Prevalence of anal hrHPV, HPV16, and ASCUS or worse cytology was 61%, 13%, and 68%. Histological aHSIL was detected in 42% of WWH with ASCUS or worse anal cytology. Prevalence of genital hrHPV, HPV16, and ASCUS or worse cytology was 30%, 4%, and 28%. Genital hrHPV predicted anal hrHPV (odds ratio [OR], 5.05), while genital HPV16 predicted anal HPV16 (OR, 9.52). Genital hrHPV and anal HPV16 predicted histological aHSIL (ORs, 2.78 and 10.9). CONCLUSIONS: Anal HPV disease was highly prevalent in this primary screening cohort of WWH. While genital screening results predicted anal disease, rates of isolated anal HPV disease were substantial, supporting universal anal cancer screening for this population.

Beyond stillbirth: association of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including sudden fetal cardiac arrhythmias, resulting in stillbirth. This association has been correlated with the total bile acid levels, which are a marker for disease severity. Studies are yet to determine if intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity is also associated with increased rates of other adverse neonatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy show a bile acid severity-based relationship with other adverse obstetrical outcomes beyond stillbirth alone. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous gestations complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy at the Elmhurst Hospital Center from 2005 to 2019. Severity was defined by the peak total bile acid levels (µmol/L): mild (10-19), low moderate (20-39), high moderate (40-99), and severe (>100). We examined the rates of spontaneous preterm labor, fetal growth restriction, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, iatrogenic preterm birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracing, umbilical artery pH, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal birthweight. The chi-square, Fisher exact, Student t, Mann-Whitney, and multivariate regression tests were used to determine the association of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and adverse neonatal outcomes. In all analyses, mild severity was used as the base comparator. A P value of <.05 and 95% confidence interval not crossing 1.00 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 1202 pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, 306 (25.5%) were mild, 449 were low moderate (37.4%), 327 were high moderate (27.2%), and 120 were severe (10.0%). After adjusting for confounders, progressive intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm labor (low moderate adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-3.38; high moderate adjusted odds ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-7.22; severe adjusted odds ratio, 6.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.97-14.55), iatrogenic preterm birth (low moderate adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.52; high moderate adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-5.06; severe adjusted odds ratio, 4.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.81-8.71), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (low moderate adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-2.36; high moderate adjusted odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-4.65; severe adjusted odds ratio, 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-7.69). There was no significant association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy disease severity is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm labor, iatrogenic preterm birth, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. These findings provide valuable insight toward patient anticipatory counseling.

"Being able to do whatever you wanna do as a woman is important:" a qualitative exploration of contraception as a frame of reference for HIV prevention with PrEP.

BACKGROUND: Use of HIV PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) is a strategic tool in the effort to end the HIV epidemic. 20% of new HIV infections in the US are among cis-gender women, yet they comprise only 5% of all PrEP users. Black women disproportionately bear the burden of new HIV acquisition and accounted for almost 60% of new HIV diagnoses among women in 2018. Increasing understanding and uptake of PrEP among women at risk of HIV acquisition in alignment with their reproductive values and preferences is key to increasing PrEP uptake and decreasing HIV burden in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study examines how experiences with contraception among women of color shape their perceptions and preferences regarding HIV PrEP to inform counseling that aligns with their reproductive values. METHODS: Women aged 18-45 who self-identified as Black or Latina were recruited at an academic medical center in the Bronx from June 2018 to July 2019. We enrolled 30 participants seeking family planning care (10), prenatal care (10), or care for sexually transmitted infections (10). Participants completed a brief written survey assessing their risk of HIV acquisition. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were then audio-recorded, transcribed, and entered into Dedoose. Grounded theory and constant comparison approaches were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants (70%) screened positive for HIV acquisition risk. Four had received information on PrEP from a medical provider prior to the interview. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) Similar to oral contraception, women conceptualized PrEP as a "daily pill" to support their reproductive health; (2) Women perceived PrEP as a tool to support autonomy and pleasure in their sexual health; (3) Like birth control, women desired multiple delivery options for HIV prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Contraception may serve as a frame of reference when counseling about PrEP among cis-women at risk of acquiring HIV. Our study suggests that this approach re-contextualizes counseling on PrEP within a sex-positive framework that prioritizes pleasure, safety, and autonomy as integral to sexual and reproductive wellness. Consideration of historically marginalized women's experiences with contraception and reproductive values may facilitate their use of PrEP.

PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) is a medicine taken daily by people at risk of getting HIV from sex or injection drug use. Although PrEP is a safe and effective medication for women, the use of PrEP remains exceedingly low among cis-gender women at risk of HIV in the US. This study examines how experiences with contraception among women of color, who disproportionately bear the burden of HIV acquisition, shape their perceptions and preferences regarding PrEP. We interviewed 30 women who self-identified as Black or Latina at an academic medical center in the Bronx. Similar to oral contraception, women in this study conceptualized PrEP as a "daily pill" to support their reproductive health. This report details how women's experiences with contraception may serve as the foundation to re-contextualize conversations on PrEP within a sex-positive framework that prioritizes pleasure, safety, and autonomy as integral to sexual and reproductive wellness.

Interpreter training for medical students: pilot implementation and assessment in a student-run clinic.

BACKGROUND: Trained medical interpreters are instrumental to patient satisfaction and quality of care. They are especially important in student-run clinics, where many patients have limited English proficiency. Because student-run clinics have ties to their medical schools, they have access to bilingual students who may volunteer to interpret, but are not necessarily formally trained. METHODS: To study the feasibility and efficacy of leveraging medical student volunteers to improve interpretation services, we performed a pilot study at the student-run clinic at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. In each fall semester in 2012-2015, we implemented a 6-h course providing didactic and interactive training on medical Spanish interpreting techniques and language skills to bilingual students. We then assessed the impact of the course on interpreter abilities. RESULTS: Participants' comfort levels, understanding of their roles, and understanding of terminology significantly increased after the course (p < 0.05), and these gains remained several months later (p < 0.05) and were repeated in an independent cohort. Patients and student clinicians also rated participants highly (averages above 4.5 out of 5) on these measures in real clinical encounters. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a formal interpreter training course tailored for medical students in the setting of a student-run clinic is feasible and effective. This program for training qualified student interpreters can serve as a model for other settings where medical students serve as interpreters.