Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 124(7): 537-44, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25667217

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of 0.2 mL of 4% atomized lidocaine on swallowing and tolerability during Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). METHODS: A single blinded study was conducted with 17 dysphagic patients, who received 4 standardized boluses in 2 sequential FEES exams under 2 conditions: non-anesthetized (decongestant only) and anesthetized (lidocaine 4%+decongestant). After each procedure, patients rated their pain on the Wong Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Clinicians scored each swallow with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) and an author-developed Residue Rating Scale. Because the assessments were ordinal, a series of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between groups on PAS or residue in the 4 boluses. Pain scores, however, were significantly lower in the anesthetized condition than the decongested-only condition (P=.035). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that 0.2 mL of 4% lidocaine enhanced exam tolerability and did not impair the swallow in dysphagic patients.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/physiopathology , Deglutition/drug effects , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Fiber Optic Technology/instrumentation , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Deglutition/physiology , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Equipment Design , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...