Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Microbiol ; 62(5): 1438-47, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21286720

ABSTRACT

Forty-eight isolates resistant to at least two antibiotics were selected from 53 antibiotic-resistant enterococci from chicken and pig meat and faeces and analysed for specific resistance determinants. Of the 48 multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, 31 were resistant to two antibiotics (29 to erythromycin and tetracycline, 1 to erythromycin and vancomycin, 1 to vancomycin and tetracycline), 14 to three (erythromycin, tetracycline and vancomycin or ampicillin) and 3 to four (erythromycin, vancomycin, ampicillin and gentamicin). erm(B), tet(M), vanA and aac (6')-Ie aph (2'')-Ia were the antibiotic resistance genes most frequently detected. All 48 MDR enterococci were susceptible to linezolid and daptomycin. Enterococcus faecalis (16), Enterococcus faecium (8), Enterococcus mundtii (2) and Enterococcus gallinarum (1) were identified in meat, and E. faecium (13) and Enterococcus durans (13) in faeces. Clonal spread was not detected, suggesting a large role of gene transfer in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. Conjugative transfer of resistance genes was more successful when donors were enterococcal strains isolated from faeces; co-transfer of vanA and erm(B) to a human E. faecium occurred from both E. faecium and E. durans pig faecal strains. These data show that multidrug resistance can be found in food and animal species other than E. faecium and E. faecalis, and that these species can efficiently transfer antibiotic resistance to human strains in inter-specific matings. In particular, the occurrence of MDR E. durans in the animal reservoir could have a role in the emergence of human enterococcal infections difficult to eradicate with antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chickens/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Gene Transfer, Horizontal , Meat/microbiology , Swine/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Conjugation, Genetic , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Enterococcus/classification , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/genetics , Enterococcus faecium/classification , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny
2.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 113(1): 75-83, 2007 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17005283

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic resistance (AR) in bacteria, a major threat to human health, has emerged in the last few decades as a consequence of the selective pressure exerted by the widespread use of antibiotics in medicine, agriculture and veterinary practice and as growth promoters in animal husbandry. The frequency of 11 genes [tet(M), tet(O), tet(K), erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), vanA, vanB, aac (6')-Ie aph (2'')-Ia, mecA, blaZ] encoding resistance to some antibiotics widely used in clinical practice was analysed in raw pork and chicken meat and in fermented sausages as well as in faecal samples from the relevant farm animals using a molecular approach based on PCR amplification of bacterial DNA directly extracted from specimens. Some of the 11 AR genes were highly prevalent, the largest number being detected in chicken meat and pig faeces. The genes found most frequently in meat were tet(K) and erm(B); vanB and mecA were the least represented. All 11 determinants were detected in faecal samples except mecA, which was found only in chicken faeces. erm(B) and erm(C) were detected in all faecal samples. The frequency of AR genes was not appreciably different in meat compared to faecal specimens of the relevant animal except for vanB, which was more prevalent in faeces. Our findings suggest that AR genes are highly prevalent in food-associated bacteria and that AR contamination is likely related to breeding rather than processing techniques. Finally, the cultivation-independent molecular method used in this work to determine the prevalence of AR genes in foods proved to be a rapid and reliable alternative to traditional tools.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/microbiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Animals , Base Sequence , Chickens , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , Enterococcus/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Gene Amplification , Humans , Meat Products/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL