Testicular Torsion Patients Should Be Manually Detorsed at Diagnosis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Influence of Interhospital Transfer and Surgical Wait Times on Surgical Organ Salvage.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess organ salvage in testicular torsion patients submitted to manual detorsion according to interhospital transfer and surgical wait times. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically treated testicular torsion patients between 2012 and 2018. We compared testicular surgical salvage in testicular torsion patients submitted to manual detorsion either at clinical diagnosis (immediate detorsion) or after interhospital transfer from lower level-of-care facilities (delayed detorsion) and estimated the influence of interhospital transfer and surgical wait times on outcomes. Analysis included Bayesian logistic regression after propensity score matching. We excluded patients first examined at off-state and private facilities, with prediagnostic time of more than 24 hours, not initially diagnosed with testicular torsion or not submitted to manual detorsion at any time. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients (median age, 15.8 years) fulfilled inclusion criteria. The median prediagnostic, transfer, and surgical wait times were respectively 4.9, 2.4, and 4.3 hours, with 58 patients undergoing immediate and 104 delayed detorsion. Propensity score matching for prediagnostic and surgical wait times paired 58 immediate with 40 delayed detorsion patients, with corresponding surgical salvage rates of 54/58 (93%) and 33/40 (82%). Forty-seven patients (29%) still had torsion at surgery. Transfer time was inversely associated with testicular salvage, with median 13% greater probability of an unfavorable outcome for each hour of transfer time. Similarly, each hour of surgical wait time decreased surgical salvage by 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate detorsion led to improved surgical outcomes in testicular torsion patients. Because of residual torsion, surgery for detorsed patients should not be postponed.

Donor Age Amplifies the Detrimental Effects of Cold Ischemia Time on Long-Term Kidney Allograft Survival Independently of the Occurrence of Delayed Graft Function or Early Acute Rejection.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the influence of the interaction between donor age and cold ischemia time on allograft survival in the absence of delayed graft function, early acute rejection, or the combination of both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients first transplanted with living-related and deceased-donor allografts between 2001 and 2016. Predictors included cold ischemia time, donor and recipient age and sex, body mass index, renal replacement therapy duration, cause of end-stage renal disease, HLA class I and II mismatches, panel of reactive antibodies score, donor creatinine concentration, development of delayed graft function, and biopsy-proven acute rejection. The response variable was time until return to renal replacement therapy. Patients who died with functioning allografts were censored at the time of death. Analyses included multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The study included 498 patients followed for median of 4.1 years with median cold ischemia time of 17.0 hours. On multivariate analysis, allograft survival was negatively affected by the cold ischemia time-donor age interaction (P = .026), acute rejection (P = .043), delayed graft function (P = .001), and acute rejection combined with delayed graft function (P = .002). Restricted mean allograft survival times in patients who developed neither delayed graft function nor acute rejection decreased from 13.6 to 8.6 years when cold ischemia time increased from 12 to 36 hours and donor age increased from 30 to 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Allograft survival was negatively affected by donor age-cold ischemia time interaction independently of the development of delayed graft function, acute rejection, or their combination.

Mini-Sling Ophira at 8 Years Follow-Up: Does It Sustain Results?

PURPOSE: To evaluate mini-sling long-term results and correlate them to failure predictors. Many studies show comparable results among different single-incision slings developed as an attempt to reduce complications while keeping good results, but there is a lack of evidence about mini-slings outcomes in the long term. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study evaluated 40 patients for long-term outcomes after mini-sling placement. Objective cure was defined as leakage of less than 1 g in 1-hour pad-test and no leakage at Valsalva maneuver. An objective improvement was defined as leakage of a maximum 50% of the preoperative test. Subjective continence was considered as a zero score at International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Patients were also evaluated for comorbidities and previous surgeries. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 (±9.3) years, the mean ICIQ-SF score was 16 (±2.98) before surgery and 3.5 (± 5) at last follow-up, showing sustained improvement in the long term, mean 100 (84-109) months follow-up. The objective results show 67.5% of success, 17.5% of improvement, and 15% of failure. Age and parity were not related to outcomes (p = 0.33), but previous surgeries increase failure rate with 5.66 OR (p = 0.04). Success, improvement, and failure rates were 85, 10, and 5% for treatment-naive patients versus 50, 25, and 25% for patients with previous surgeries, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mini-sling Ophira shows good long-term results with low complications rates in patients without previous anti-incontinence surgery. Randomized trials are necessary to compare mini-slings results to other mid-urethral slings in recurred stress urinary incontinence.

Controvérsias com o emprego de malhas no tratamento de problemas do assoalho pélvico / Controversies about the use of mesh in the management of pelvic floor problems

La utilización de las mallas en el tratamiento del prolapso de los órganos pélvicos es una excelente alternativa principalmente en el tratamiento de los prolapsos apicales (uterino / cúpula vaginal), a través de una sacrocolpopexia por vía abdominal, así como en los prolapsos anteriores, por vía vaginal. Para el prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior no existe evidencia del beneficio de las mallas para la corrección del problema. Los factores más importantes para el éxito quirúrgico y minimizar las complicaciones asociadas a las mallas son fundamentalmente la selección adecuada de las pacientes y que el cirujano deba tener un adecuado entrenamiento en cirugías del piso pélvico.

Use of mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is an excellent alternative especially in the treatment of the apical prolapse (uterine / vaginal vault) through an abdominal sacrocolpopexia; also in the anterior wall prolapse treated per vagina. There is no evidence to support use of mesh to correct posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Most important factors for favorable surgical outcome and to reduce mesh-associated complications are adequate selection of patients and a surgeon adequately trained for pelvic floor surgery.