ABSTRACT
Surgery and regular follow-up are two main measures for small gastric stromal tumors (sGST) less than 2cm in diameter, while there is no sound evidence to prove which treatment is more beneficial to sGST patients. In this study, we reviewed the clinical and pathological features of patients with sGST receiving surgery and discussed the value of surgical intervention. In all, 90 patients who were diagnosed as sGST(less than 2cm) and accepted surgical treatment were enrolled, correspondently, another 104 patients with GSTs between 2-5cm and 74 patients with GSTs >5cm were collected as Control groups 1 and 2, respectively, and all of them received surgical treatment. Results showed that there were no significant difference among 3 groups in terms of gender, age, clinical features, tumor locations, and mutations of the exon 9 or 11 in C-kit gene, and immunohistochemical results of CD117, CD34, and DOG-1 proteins (P > 0.05). However, we observed growing percentage of medium-/high-risk GSTs and nucleus mitotic counts >5/50 HPF in Control groups (P < 0.05). Patients with sGST were more suitable for minimally invasive procedures than the other 2 groups, with shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period (medium 45.4 months), the recurrence rate was also associated with tumor size, which surged from 1.11% in sGST group to 7.69% and 17.56% in Control groups 1 and 2, respectively. In all, we concluded that patients with sGST experienced low proportions of medium-/high-risk tumors; however, they still suffered from potential risk of tumor progression. Due to satisfied surgical outcome, surgical treatment could be suggested for sGST.
