Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 50(10): 3756-3762, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586840

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. Drug-resistant CMV is an emerging problem with poor survival outcomes and limited therapeutic options. In this study we comprehensively address the issue of drug resistance in CMV when compared with standard therapies, such as ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients diagnosed with CMV after solid-organ transplant at our center between 2013 and 2017, and identified 7 resistant CMV cases. To study risk factors in the published literature, we performed an extensive database search. RESULTS: All patients had documented UL97 mutations, and 3 patients harbored both UL97 and UL54 mutations. For cases with increasing viral load or failure to achieve clinical improvement despite optimal therapy, genetic resistance testing was carried out. Patients received GCV and foscarnet combination therapy. As an adjunct, CMV immunoglobulin, cidofovir, and leflunomide were added. Risk factors, including donor+/recipient- serostatus, persistent high viral replication, prolonged therapeutic GCV exposure (>2.5 months), and allograft rejection, were assessed. CONCLUSION: Patients at risk, especially those with D+/R- serostatus, should be judiciously monitored for resistance. Prolonged intravenous GCV exposure increases the risk for development of drug resistance. Therefore, precise guidelines are required for prevention of long-term GCV/VGCV exposure. Investigation regarding interferon-gamma release assay and adoptive transfer of T cells in diagnosed CMV patients is warranted to improve future prophylactic and management strategies against CMV, with a potential to reduce the requirement for available toxic antiviral drugs.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cidofovir/administration & dosage , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Foscarnet/administration & dosage , Ganciclovir/administration & dosage , Humans , Leflunomide/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Postoperative Complications/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Viral Load , Virus Replication
2.
Transplant Proc ; 50(1): 137-141, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29407296

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and CDI recurrence due to their suppressed immune systems and antibiotic exposure. A combination of metronidazole and oral vancomycin is often prescribed for SOT recipients with uncomplicated CDI despite any clinical practice guidelines supporting the need for combination therapy. This study aims to compare the CDI recurrence rates of metronidazole/vancomycin combination therapy to oral vancomycin monotherapy in SOT recipients after a first episode of uncomplicated CDI. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated SOT recipients diagnosed with uncomplicated CDI who were treated with vancomycin monotherapy or vancomycin/metronidazole combination therapy. The primary endpoint was CDI recurrence defined as a second CDI episode within 8 weeks of completing index CDI therapy. The secondary endpoints were time between the end of CDI therapy and recurrence, length of total hospitalization after the index CDI, and length of hospitalization after index CDI diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (25%) of 61 subjects experienced CDI recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in CDI recurrence rate between the vancomycin monotherapy group and combination therapy group (23% versus 27%, respectively; P = .715). The median total length of hospitalization between the vancomycin monotherapy and combination therapy groups was statistically significant (9 versus 14 days, respectively; P = .047). DISCUSSION: There was no difference found in recurrence rate between oral vancomycin monotherapy versus combination therapy. The study result weakens the practice of prescribing combination therapy for uncomplicated CDI in SOT recipients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clostridioides difficile , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Vancomycin/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...