Characterization of atypical cystic renal masses with MDCT: comparison of 5-mm axial images and thin multiplanar reconstructed images.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cystic renal masses are better characterized on thin axial and multiplanar reconstructed MDCT images than on 5-mm images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 70 complex cystic renal masses in 59 patients (45 men, 14 women; mean age, 68 +/- 13 years) who underwent 64-MDCT at two medical centers were studied. Twenty-three of the masses were confirmed on the basis of the histologic findings and 47 in 2-4 years of follow-up. Images were reviewed in two sessions by two radiologists with 12 and 2 years of experience. In the first session, 5-mm axial images were analyzed, and in the second, thin axial images and multiplanar reconstructions. To assess intraobserver variability, analysis was repeated after 1 month. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon's signed rank test, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Radiologists 1 and 2 detected thicker cystic walls (p < 0.001, p < 0.005) and septa (p < 0.03, p < 0.05) and fewer septa (p < 0.005, p < 0.002) on 5-mm axial images and assigned significantly different Bosniak categories than they did in analysis of the volume data (p < 0.04, p < 0.05). Variability was reduced in thin axial and multiplanar views. No significant differences were found in characterization of lesions as benign or malignant in review of 5-mm axial images and volume data sets. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.89 for 5-mm images and 0.96 for volume data sets for radiologist 1 and 0.87 and 0.90 for radiologist 2. CONCLUSION: Analysis of volume data sets is associated with less intraobserver and interobserver variability than review of 5-mm axial images. Wall thickness and the number and thickness of septa may differ, resulting in assignment of different Bosniak categories. Diagnostic performance in characterizing lesions as benign or malignant, however, is not statistically different for the thick and thin images.

Painful penile induration: imaging findings and management.

A number of benign and malignant diseases with different causes, clinical features, management, and outcome can manifest as painful penile induration. The most common such conditions are active Peyronie disease, inflammation, trauma, venous or corporal thrombosis, acute ischemic disorders, and primary or secondary tumors. In patients with painful penile induration, a preliminary differential diagnosis is based on the patient's history and results of laboratory studies, penile inspection, and palpation. Imaging is often required to confirm the clinical diagnosis, assess the extent of disease, and determine patient treatment. A basic clinical investigation comprising penile inspection and palpation should be performed by the radiologist before imaging; such an evaluation is a great help in selecting the best imaging modality and examination technique. Moreover, acquisition of preliminary clinical information eases interpretation of the imaging features and facilitates identification of clinically relevant information that may result in a change in patient treatment. In standard clinical practice, color Doppler ultrasonography is often the first imaging modality used to evaluate patients with painful penile induration. This technique clearly demonstrates normal penile anatomy and its corresponding changes in most of the clinically relevant situations. Magnetic resonance imaging is the optimal imaging modality for tumor staging. Other imaging modalities are required less frequently.

Color Doppler sonography of intrahepatic vascular shunts.

PURPOSE: To illustrate the sonographic and Doppler features of the different types of intrahepatic vascular shunts. METHODS: Patients presenting in our department with intrahepatic vascular shunts with healthy livers or with a variety of liver pathologies underwent color Doppler interrogation and spectral analysis. RESULTS: Intrahepatic vascular shunts may involve all liver vessels. Arterioportal and arteriosystemic venous connections can be recognized in normal and cirrhotic livers, following trauma, within tumors, and within nontumoral arteriovenous malformations. Portosystemic intrahepatic venous shunts are categorized into 4 morphologic types. Systemic-to-systemic shunts are more often recognized in patients with chronic hepatic venous congestion or with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Portal-to-portal intrahepatic venous shunts are rare, with few cases described. CONCLUSION: In general, all the liver vessels can be associated with formation of arterioportal, arteriosystemic, and portosystemic venous shunts and, rarely, systemic venous shunts and portal-to-portal communications. Sonography allows characterization of the different intrahepatic shunts.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for detecting renal infarcts proven by contrast enhanced CT. A feasibility study.

The effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the evaluation of patients with acute renal infarcts was investigated, using contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT) as the reference imaging procedure. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with acute renal infarcts detected with contrast-enhanced helical CT underwent CEUS. Digital cine-clips of CEUS were evaluated by two independent readers blinded to CT findings. Image quality was rated subjectively on a four-point scale. Then, readers were asked to assign a confidence level in diagnosis of renal infarct at the upper pole, medium portion, and lower pole of each kidney according to a five-degree scale, ranging from definitely absent to definitely present. ROC curve analysis was employed to assess the overall confidence of diagnosis of infarct, and weighted kappa values were calculated to assess inter-reader agreement. The subjective image quality of CEUS was lower than the image quality of CT at the upper poles. However, the diagnostic performance of CEUS was excellent (area under receiver-operator characteristic curve 0.992 +/- 0.006 for reader 1; 0.991 +/- 0.007 for reader 2), with very good inter-reader agreement (weighted kappa value = 0.83). CEUS is a reproducible tool to detect acute renal infarcts in men, with a diagnostic performance approaching that of CT.