Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md) ; 28(1): 10-15, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33424210

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of C. difficile infection (CDI) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients, determine its incidence and report outcomes of CDI in our patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records of adult HSCT recipients diagnosed between 2013 and 2016 at our center. Logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between risk factors and the odds of CDI. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CDI in HSCT patients was 9.4%. The incidence of CDI was higher in allogeneic HSCT (20%) versus autologous HSCT (4.8%). No statistically significant differences in age, gender, cancer type, transplant type were found between those who developed CDI and those who did not. However, patients with CDI had a longer length of stay (25 days) and used more antibiotics (30 days prior to and during admission for HSCT) than non-CDI patients (19 days). Only two of 17 patients (11.8%) with CDI experienced recurrence among 180 patients after HSCT. No patient suffered from toxic megacolon or ileus and no patient underwent colectomy. There was no mortality associated with CDI at our center. CONCLUSION: CDI has an incidence rate of 9.4% in HSCT recipients. Established risk factors including age, gender, cancer type, and transplant type were not identified as risk factors in our population. However, longer LOS and use of greater than four lines of antibiotics were observed among those with CDI compared to those without CDI.

2.
Blood Rev ; 39: 100616, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500848

ABSTRACT

The practice of choosing the next best therapy for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is becoming increasingly complex. There is no clear consensus regarding the best treatment sequence for RRMM. With the approval of novel proteasome inhibitors (ixazomib and carfilzomib), immunomodulatory agents (pomalidomide), monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab and elotuzumab), and other targeted therapies, multiple combination regimens utilizing these agents are being studied with the goal of enhancing disease control, prolonging progression-free survival, and improving overall survival. We, herein, describe a review of FDA-approved regimens for RRMM patients and offer a paradigm in selecting subsequent treatment regimens, focusing on patient specific morbidity, treatment toxicity, and disease-specific characteristics.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
3.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 19(7): 447-461, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31060991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pomalidomide (Pom) has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative activity in combination regimens as a result of its distinct anticancer, antiangiogenic, and immunomodulatory effects. This review aimed to compare outcome measures of different Pom regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified a total of 1374 studies. Thirty-five studies assessing 4623 subjects met the inclusion criteria: phase 2/3 trial, ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, and clearly documented efficacy outcomes like overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and progression-free survival. Statistical analyses for meta-analysis was performed by CMA version 3 and Cochrane Q statistics (P < .05 considered significant, I2 index for heterogeneity). A random effects model was used if there was significant heterogeneity (P ≥ .05 over I2 ≥ 50%). RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed ORR 47.1% across all Pom-based (2- and 3-drug) regimens. Stratified analysis for efficacy outcomes (pooled ORR [%] and mean progression-free survival [months]) are reported. With doublet regimen, Pom with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex) was the most common regimen (35.7%, 6.1 months), and overall survival was 14.37 months. With triplet regimens, pooled ORR was 61.9% (I2 = 87.3%). These included bortezomib + Pom + LoDex (83.5%, 15.7 months), carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex (77.1%, 15.3 months), Pom + LoDex-bendamustine (74.2%), Pom-dexamethasone-daratumumab (64.5%), Pom + LoDex-cyclophosphamide (59.4%, 9.5 months), and Pom + LoDex-doxorubicin (32%). Leading adverse events were myelosuppression, with mean incidences of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of 47.6%, 26.5%, and 20.8%, respectively. Mean incidence of grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infections 29.1%, pneumonia 13.8%, and fatigue 10%. CONCLUSION: Three-drug Pom regimens yielded double the response rates compared to Pom + LoDex (pooled ORR, 61.9% vs. 35.7%), with bortezomib + Pom + LoDex and carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex demonstrating better outcomes than other regimens.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Recurrence , Retreatment , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 19(7): 397-405, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036508

ABSTRACT

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically complex disease. Identification of mutations and aberrant signaling pathways that contribute to the progression of MM and drug resistance has potential to lead to specific targets and personalized treatment. Aberrant signal pathways include RAS pathway activation due to RAS or BRAF mutations (targeted by vemurafenib alone or combined with cobimetinib), BCL-2 overexpression in t(11:14) (targeted by venetoclax), JAK2 pathway activation (targeted by ruxolitinib), NF-κB pathway activation (treated with DANFIN combined with bortezomib), MDM2 overexpression, and PI3K/mTOR pathway activation (targeted by BEZ235). Cyclin D1 (CCND1) and MYC are also emerging as key potential targets. In addition, histone deacetylase inhibitors are already in use for the treatment of MM in combination therapy, and targeted inhibition of FGFR3 (AZD4547) is effective in myeloma cells with t(4;14) translocation. Bromodomain and extra terminal (BET) protein antagonists decrease the expression of MYC and have displayed promising antimyeloma activity. A better understanding of the alterations in signaling pathways that promote MM progression will further inform the development of precision therapy for patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Precision Medicine , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Precision Medicine/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...