Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol ; 29(5): 353-7, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17805438

ABSTRACT

Myofascial pain syndromes are characterized by the presence of painful loci within muscles, tendons or ligaments, called trigger points. Infiltration of these points with local anesthetics is often used as a treatment modality. The aim of the study was to comparatively evaluate 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% ropivacaine for trigger point injection regarding pain on injection, treatment efficacy and duration of symptoms remission. Sixty-eight patients, suffering from myofascial pain syndromes, were randomly assigned to two groups to receive either levobupivacaine or ropivacaine for trigger-point injection. After completion of the procedure, patients were asked to rate pain during injection and efficacy of the treatment, based on immediate relief. Two weeks later, they were asked about the duration of this relief. Statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between groups with respect to pain during injection, efficacy of the treatment and duration of pain relief. The two local anesthetics seem to be equally effective for trigger point infiltration.


Subject(s)
Amides/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/drug therapy , Adult , Amides/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Levobupivacaine , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Ropivacaine
2.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 21(10): 781-6, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15678732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate whether the duration of action of a single bolus dose of rocuronium is influenced by maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol infusion. METHODS: Fifty-seven ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl 5 microg kg(-1) and tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 0.9 mg kg(-1). Thereafter patients were randomly allocated to three different groups to receive sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery of neuromuscular function was monitored by single twitch stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the adductor pollicis response using accelerometry. Intergroup recovery times to 5% of control value of single twitch were analysed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) recovery time to 5% of control value of single twitch during desflurane anaesthesia was 90.18 (86.11-94.25) min. Significantly shorter recovery times were observed during sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia, 58.86 (54.73-62.99) min and 51.11 (45.47-56.74) min, respectively (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the recovery time between groups receiving desflurane vs. sevoflurane (P < 0.001) and desflurane vs. propofol (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane anaesthesia significantly prolongs the duration of action of rocuronium at 0.9 mg kg(-1) single bolus dose, compared to sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia maintenance regimens.


Subject(s)
Androstanols/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Isoflurane/analogs & derivatives , Methyl Ethers , Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/administration & dosage , Propofol , Abdomen/surgery , Adult , Desflurane , Female , Humans , Male , Neuromuscular Blockade , Rocuronium , Sevoflurane , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...