Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(2): 295-301, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36735447

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The current literature lacks evidence to support the relationship between gender-affirming testosterone use and urinary tract infections (UTIs). OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are to compare UTI rates among gender diverse people assigned female at birth on testosterone (GDT) to cisgender women (CW) and to identify factors associated with UTI. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of GDT and age-matched CW over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification, UTI diagnosis codes with a filled pharmacy order for antibiotics within 7 days of the diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 2,401 GDT who were then age matched to 2,401 CW. The mean rates of UTI among GDT and CW were not significantly different at 0.09 and 0.10 UTIs per year, respectively. During the study period, 6.9% of GDT and 7.5% of CW had at least 1 UTI. Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 was significantly associated with UTI frequency among CW (P = 0.04) but not GDT (P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of UTIs among our young cohort of GDT and CW was similarly low. Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 was significantly associated with UTIs among CW but not GDT. These findings suggest that testosterone-induced vaginal atrophy may not be associated with a higher a UTI risk. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of UTI in people assigned female at birth and more data on the relationship between testosterone and UTIs are needed before recommending vaginal estrogen to all GDT with recurrent UTI.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Urinary Tract Infections , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Testosterone/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Testosterone Congeners , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
3.
Int J Transgend ; 20(1): 81-86, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32999595

ABSTRACT

Background: Gender affirming surgeries are increasingly accessible to transgender and non-binary individuals due to changes in health care coverage policies and rising numbers of trained providers. Improved access to care has led to an increase in the number of individuals pursuing gender affirming surgeries. Little is known about how to optimally prepare patients for these surgeries. Aims: This evaluation examined attendees' assessment of a four-hour single-session class developed to prepare transgender and non-binary patients and their caregivers for gender affirming surgeries in a multi-disciplinary transgender clinic within an integrated health care system. Methods: A multi-disciplinary group of providers within a health maintenance organization in Northern California designed and facilitated two separate curricula, one for patients preparing for metoidioplasty/phalloplasty and the other preparing for vaginoplasty. Between November 2015 and June 2017, 214 patients and caregivers took one of the two versions of the class and completed the post-class survey evaluating perceived favorability of the class and preparedness regarding surgery options, complications and postoperative care. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the Likert scale questions, with 1 showing the least improvement and 5 showing the most. Results: Of the 214 patients and caregivers that completed the survey, the majority reported that they were better informed about their surgical options (mean: 4.4, SD: 0.7), more prepared for surgery (mean: 4.5, SD: 0.6), better informed about possible complications (mean: 4.5, SD: 0.7), and better understood their postoperative care needs (mean: 4.6, SD: 0.6). Of the respondents, 204 (95%) reported they would recommend the course to a friend preparing for gender affirming surgery. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that a single-session class is a favorable method for preparing transgender and non-binary patients to make informed decisions regarding the perioperative gender affirming surgical process, from preoperative preparedness, to surgical complications, and postoperative care.

4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(5): 847-855, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165183

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of utilization of alternative treatments before hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications within a large integrated health care system. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomies for benign gynecologic conditions between 2012 and 2014 (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a community-based integrated health system. PATIENTS: Women who underwent hysterectomy for a benign gynecologic condition between 2012 and 2014. INTERVENTIONS: From an eligible cohort of 6892 patients who underwent hysterectomy, a stratified random sample of 1050 patients were selected for chart review. Stratification was based on the proportion of indications for hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the use of alternative treatments before hysterectomy. Alternative treatments included oral hormone treatment, leuprolide, medroxyprogesterone intramuscular injections, a levonorgestrel intrauterine device, hormonal subdermal implants, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, hysteroscopy, and myomectomy. Of the 1050 charts reviewed, 979 (93.2%) met the criteria for inclusion in this study. The predominant indication for hysterectomy was symptomatic myomas (54.4%), followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (29.0%), endometriosis (5.8%), pelvic pain (3.1%), dysmenorrhea (3.4%), and other (4.3%). The major routes of hysterectomy were laparoscopy (68.7%) and vaginal hysterectomy (13.4%). Before hysterectomy, 81.2% of patients tried at least 1 type of alternative treatment (33.8% with 1 treatment and 47.4% with at least 2 treatments), and 99.3% of patients were counseled regarding alternative treatments. Compared with younger women age <40 years, women age 45 to 49 years were less likely to use alternative treatments before hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.76). There were no variations in treatment rates by socioeconomic status or between major racial and ethnic groups. The final pathological analysis identified myomas as the most common pathology (n = 637; 65.1%); 96 patients (9.8%) had normal uterine pathology. CONCLUSION: More than 80% of patients received alternative treatments before undergoing hysterectomy for a benign gynecologic condition. Additional investigation is warranted to assess alternative treatment use as it relates to preventing unnecessary hysterectomies.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Ablation Techniques/methods , Hysterectomy/methods , Uterine Diseases/surgery , Uterine Diseases/therapy , Adult , California/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Hysteroscopy , Laparoscopy , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Medroxyprogesterone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Myoma/surgery , Pelvic Pain/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Uterine Artery Embolization/methods , Uterine Myomectomy/methods
5.
J Sex Med ; 10(8): 2121-4, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22429501

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Reports of postcoital vaginal rupture in the literature are limited to cases involving women who are postmenopausal, have recently undergone pelvic surgery, or have suffered genitourinary trauma. AIM: We report a case of postcoital vaginal rupture in a 23-year-old woman with no prior surgical history who complained of acute onset, severe vaginal pain after consensual intercourse. RESULTS: Examination under anesthesia revealed a 6-cm laceration of the posterior fornix, which extended into the abdominal cavity. The laceration was repaired using a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Coitus-induced vaginal rupture in a reproductive aged woman with no prior pelvic surgery or other risk factors is a rare clinical presentation. Prior reports of rupture in premenopausal women have recommended repair via laparotomy. This case documents successful transvaginal and laparoscopic repair, and reviews the etiological mechanisms for coitus-induced injury.


Subject(s)
Coitus , Vagina/injuries , Vagina/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Lacerations/etiology , Rupture/etiology , Rupture/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...