Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hypertens ; 17(9): 1339-44, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10489113

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a selected population of subjects with a recent diagnosis of hypertension whether a blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure is associated with more advanced cardiac and vascular damage. METHODS: One hundred and eleven recently diagnosed and never-treated patients with mild essential hypertension underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography. RESULTS: The 78 patients with normal (> 10%) night-time fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (dippers) were similar to the 33 patients with a small (< or = 10 %) fall (non-dippers) for age, sex, body surface area, smoking habit, clinic and 24-h blood pressure. There were no differences between dippers and non-dippers in left ventricular mass index (104 versus 105 g/m2), common carotid internal diameter (5.8 versus 5.9 mm), intima-media thickness (0.66 versus 0.64 mm) and carotid plaques prevalence (25 versus 29%). Furthermore, no differences were found in the correlation of daytime and night-time SBP and DBP with left ventricular mass and carotid wall thickness. When the 77 men and 34 women were analysed separately, similar results were obtained. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a blunted reduction in night-time blood pressure does not play a major role in the development of cardiovascular changes during the early phase of essential hypertension.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Cardiovascular System/physiopathology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Adult , Age Factors , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Tunica Intima/diagnostic imaging , Tunica Media/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
2.
J Hypertens ; 17(6): 835-41, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10459882

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < or = 140/90 mm Hg) in a representative sample of treated hypertensive patients followed in our hypertension clinic. Second, to assess in a subgroup of these patients: (a) the proportion of BP control with both clinic blood pressure (CBP < or =140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (< or =132/85 mm Hg) criteria, and (b) the prevalence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index, LVMI>125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre clinic during a period of 6 months and who had regularly been followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. BP was taken in the clinic by a doctor using a mercury sphygmomanometer with the participants seated. Seventy-four patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics to the entire population of participants underwent complete echocardiographic examination and 24 h ABP monitoring. RESULTS: During follow-up, 352 of the treated patients had clinic BP < or =140/90 mm Hg, 198< or =160/95 mm Hg and 150>160/95 mm Hg, indicating that BP control was satisfactory in 50.3%, borderline in 28.3% and unsatisfactory in 21.4% of the cases. In the subgroup of 74 patients, the proportion of individuals with satisfactory clinic BP control (CBP< or =140/90 mm Hg) was higher (50.0 versus 33.6%) than with satisfactory ABP control (daytime ABP values < or =132/85 mm Hg). LVH was found in 21 of the 74 patients (28.3%): 12 of them had unsatisfactory CBP control and 19 had unsatisfactory ABP control. LVMI did not correlate with CBP values but only with ABP values (mean 24 h systolic r = 0.47, diastolic r = 0.40, P<0.001; mean daytime systolic r = 0.45, mean daytime diastolic r = 0.39, P<0.001; mean night-time systolic r = 0.38, mean night-time diastolic r = 0.38, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension centre clinic have satisfactory CBP control in 50% of cases, but this rate seems to over-estimate the effective BP control during daily life. A large fraction of patients show persistence of LVH and this evidence of organ damage almost entirely concerns individuals with poor ABP control.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/etiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Contraction , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...