Antihypertensive treatment and control in a large primary care population of 21 167 patients.

The efficacy of antihypertensive drug therapy is undisputed, but observational studies show that few patients reach a target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. However, there is limited data on the drug prescribing patterns and their effectiveness in real practice. This retrospective observational survey of electronic patient records extracted data from 24 Swedish primary health-care centres, with a combined registered population of 330 000 subjects. We included all patients > 30 years with a recorded diagnosis of hypertension who consulted the centres in 2005 or 2006 (n=21 167). Main outcome measures were systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and prescribed antihypertensive drug classes. Only 27% had a blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. The number of prescribed drugs increased with age, except among the oldest (> 90 years). Only 29% of patients given monotherapy had a blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. Women more often received diuretics (52 vs 42%), and less often angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (22 vs 33%) and calcium channel blockers (26 vs 31%) than men. ß-Blockers and diuretics were the most common drug classes prescribed, independent of comorbidity. In conclusion, one out of four primary care patients with hypertension reach target blood pressure. More frequent use of drug combinations may improve blood pressure control.

Potential savings without compromising the quality of care.

AIMS: This study was designed to analyse the association between adherence to guidelines for rational drug use and surrogate outcome markers for hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional ecological design. Data from dispensed prescriptions and medical records were analysed from 24 primary healthcare centres with a combined registered population of 330,000 patients in 2006. Guideline adherence was determined calculating the proportion of the prescribed volume of antidiabetic agents, antihypertensives and lipid-lowering agents representing the 14 different drugs included in the guidelines for these three areas. Patient outcome was assessed using surrogate marker data on HbA1C, blood pressure (BP) and s-cholesterol. The association between the guidelines adherence and outcomes measures was analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: The proportion of guideline antidiabetic drugs in relation to all antidiabetic drugs prescribed varied between 80% and 97% among the practices, the ratio of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors to all renin-angiotensin drugs 40-77% and the ratio of simvastatin to all statins 58-90%. The proportion of patients reaching targets for HbA1C, BP and s-cholesterol varied between 34% and 66%, 36% and 57% and 46% and 71% respectively. No significant associations were found between adherence to the guidelines and outcome. The expenditures for antihypertensives and lipid-lowering drugs could potentially be reduced by 10% and 50% respectively if all practices adhered to the guidelines as the top performing practices. CONCLUSION: A substantial amount of money can be saved in primary care without compromising the quality of care by using recommended first-line drugs for the treatment diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia.