Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 20(6): 431-4, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16825971

ABSTRACT

The authors present a case report illustrating a visceral complication that may occur as result of thoracic pedicle screw placement. The case describes the previously unreported occurrence of esophageal impingement secondary to anterior vertebral body perforation by a pedicle screw at the third thoracic vertebra. This case highlights the challenge of thoracic pedicle screw placement and the importance of preoperatively measuring the maximum anterior-posterior dimension of the vertebral body.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws/adverse effects , Esophagus/injuries , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Wounds, Penetrating/etiology , Adolescent , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Multiple Trauma/complications , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/complications , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnostic imaging
2.
Air Med J ; 19(1): 8-12, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11067238

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Caring for an infectious patient in the air medical environment presents a special challenge to all air crew members (ACMs) involved. The purpose of this study was to survey the infectious disease control practices of air medical programs (AMPs) that are members of the Association of Air Medical Services. METHODS: A structured telephone survey was designed to gather data. Using one interviewer (an undergraduate student) with no knowledge of the study's goal minimized experimental bias. AMPs from 151 geographically selected areas were called between June and August 1996. Only the programs' chief flight nurses (CFNs) were targeted as respondents. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% (138 of 151). Although no program refused to participate, 13 CFNs were unavailable to be interviewed. Mission profile was 32% scene and 68% interhospital with an annual average of 950 patient transports per program. Transport type was 61% rotor-wing aircraft, 17% fixed-wing, and 22% both. Flight physicals for ACMs were required by 57% of the AMPs. Pre-employment screenings for rubella, tuberculosis (TB), and varicella were noted. Interestingly, 17% of the AMPs reported pre-employment HIV testing. Immunization was mandated by 57% of AMPs, including hepatitis B virus, measles, rubella, and tetanus. Nine percent of the respondents refused to accept a transport with specific contagious conditions, primarily TB. A formal decontamination policy was in effect at 88% of the AMPs, and OSHA-approved filter masks were available at 70%. Pathogen exposure reporting was required by 97%. CONCLUSION: A current, comprehensive infection control program, continuing education, and 100% compliance with standard precautions will help reduce the possibility of accidental exposures. These strategies to reduce transmission also can be extended during training sessions to the prehospital and hospital personnel with whom the air medical program serves.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Data Collection , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Organizational Policy , Transportation of Patients , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...