Quantifying Surgeon Intuition Using a Judgment Analysis Model: Surgeon Accuracy of Predicting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Is Moderate at Best.

Purpose: To quantify surgeon intuition, determine whether a surgeon's prediction of outcomes after hip arthroscopy correlates with actual patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and identify differences in clinical judgment between expert and novice examiners. Methods: This prospective, longitudinal study was conducted at an academic medical center on adults undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. A Surgeon Intuition and Prediction (SIP) score was completed preoperatively by an attending surgeon (expert) and physician assistant (novice). Baseline and postoperative outcome measures included legacy hip scores (e.g., Modified Harris Hip score) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System tools. Mean differences were assessed using t-tests. Generalized estimating equations assessed longitudinal changes. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) evaluated associations between SIP score and PRO scores. Results: Data from 98 patients (mean age 36 years, 67% female) with complete data sets at 12-month follow-up were analyzed. Weak-to-moderate strength correlations were seen between SIP score and PRO scores (r = 0.36 to r = 0.53) for pain, activity and physical function. Significant improvements were seen in all primary outcome measures at 6 and 12 months postoperatively when compared to baseline scores (P < .05), with about 50% to 80% of patients achieving the minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state thresholds postoperatively. Conclusions: An experienced, high-volume hip arthroscopist had only weak-to-moderate ability to intuitively predict PRO. Surgical intuition and judgment were not superior in an expert examiner compared to a novice. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Indications and Guidelines for Debridement and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prosthetic joint infection is one the most common causes of revision surgery after hip or knee replacement. Debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is one method of treating these infections; however, significant controversy exists. The purpose of our review was to describe current knowledge about indications, intraoperative/postoperative patient management, and outcomes of DAIR. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient selection affects the success of DAIR. Medical comorbidities, duration of symptoms, and nature of infectious organism all influence outcomes. Intraoperative techniques such as open arthrotomy, extensive debridement, copious irrigation, and exchange of modular parts remain current standards for DAIR. Postoperative administration of antibiotics tailored to operative cultures remains critical. Antibiotic suppression may increase the success of DAIR. DAIR provides reasonable infection eradication between 50 and 80% with improved outcomes in appropriately selected patients. More research is needed on the use of adjuvant therapies intraoperatively and the role of postoperative antibiotic suppression.

Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variables: lateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority was female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade. RESULTS: A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (P ≤ 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (>3 mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction >5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, and tip-apex distance >25 mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (P = 0.58) or fellowship training (P = 0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (Odds ratios [OR] = 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR = 4.3, CI, 1.3-14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR = 3.6, CI, 1.0-13.0) were associated with fixation cutout. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or nonmodifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (nonmodifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.