Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 41(4): 1021-1027, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30341673

ABSTRACT

Dosimetry check (DC) is a commercial software that allows reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using transit electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images. In this work, we evaluated the suitability of DC software for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) transit dosimetry. The volumetric gamma agreement index 3%/3 mm between twenty VMAT dose distributions reconstructed by DC and calculated with treatment planning system (TPS) were compared to those obtained using PTW OCTAVIUS®4D to assess DC accuracy in VMAT quality assurance (QA). The sensitivity of DC in detecting VMAT delivery and set-up errors and anatomical variations has been investigated by measuring the variation of the gamma agreement index before and after the introduction of specific errors in four VMAT plans related to different anatomical sites. The influence of dose computation algorithm in presence of density inhomogeneity was also assessed. The assessment of VMAT QA shows agreements with TPS maps comparable to OCTAVIUS® 4D (OCT) in homogeneous phantom (p < 0.001). DC mean gamma agreement index was 94.2% ± 3.4, versus 95.6% ± 2.5 of OCT, lower dose threshold was set to 10%. Introduction of deliberate errors resulted in lower gamma agreement index and in 38/56 cases the gamma agreement index was over the detection threshold. The dose computation algorithm of DC is accurate in all anatomical sites except lung. However in lung cases, the aqua vivo approach used in this work reduced the algorithm dependence of DC results. DC accurately reproduced VMAT 3D dose distributions in phantom and is sensitive to detect errors caused by delivery inaccuracy and anatomical variations of patients.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Software , Algorithms , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 43(1): 213-9, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013043

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To propose a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality assurance procedure that can be used for multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six centers (35 MR scanners with field strengths: 1T, 1.5T, and 3T) were enrolled in the study. Two different DWI acquisition series (b-value ranges 0-1000 and 0-3000 s/mm(2) , respectively) were performed for each MR scanner. All DWI acquisitions were performed by using a cylindrical doped water phantom. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as well as ADC values along each of the three main orthogonal directions of the diffusion gradients (x, y, and z) were calculated. Short-term repeatability of ADC measurement was evaluated for 26 MR scanners. RESULTS: A good agreement was found between the nominal and measured mean ADC over all the centers. More than 80% of mean ADC measurements were within 5% from the nominal value, and the highest deviation and overall standard deviation were 9.3% and 3.5%, respectively. Short-term repeatability of ADC measurement was found <2.5% for all MR scanners. CONCLUSION: A specific and widely accepted protocol for quality controls in DWI is still lacking. The DWI quality assurance protocol proposed in this study can be applied in order to assess the reliability of DWI-derived indices before tackling single- as well as multicenter studies.


Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Italy , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 163(4): 491-8, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25013032

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the patient dosimetric impact of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), both in an operating theatre (OR) and in an angiosuite (AS), with the facility of Dynamic CT (Dyna CT, Siemens AG, Berlin, Germany). One hundred and forty-six consecutive EVAR procedures dating from May 2011 to March 2013 were analysed. These were performed either in an OR (n = 97) using a mobile C-arm or in an AS (n = 49) equipped with a ceiling-mounted angiography system. Air kerma area product (P(KA)) and total air kerma at reference point (K(a,r)) values were reported for all procedures and Dyna CT. Radiation exposure during EVAR was quite low in the majority of patients but nearly 50 % higher if performed in AS vs. OR. Median Dyna CT K(a,r) was the same as an entire EVAR procedure in OR. The higher patient's radiation exposure recorded in the AS should be balanced with the technical advantages given to the EVAR procedure.


Subject(s)
Angiography , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Simulation , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/methods
4.
Radiol Med ; 119(10): 803-10, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24599754

ABSTRACT

An increase has been observed not only in the absolute number of CT examinations but also in the length of coverage and number of scanning phases, with the result that exposure to ionising radiation from CT is becoming an increasingly serious problem. The extent of the problem is not entirely known and cannot be adequately addressed without proper knowledge of all the phases that leads to the effective dose calculation. In light of the growing awareness of the issue of ionising radiation dose and the possible risk for the individual and the population, there is a need for radiologists, medical physicists and radiographers to play an active role in dose management. In this review, the authors try to delineate the problem in a consequential and multifaceted way: radiation-patient interaction, possible mechanisms of damage, main CT dose units, risk and its quantification in the population, with the aim of optimising the acquisition dose without diagnostic drawbacks. For an "up-to-date" use of CT, radiologists must know the dose concerns for the single patient and population, and use the CT apparatus with the best dose care; substitute CT with other diagnostic techniques when possible, especially in children; reduce the number/extension of scans and phases, and the dose in single scans and single examinations.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Pediatrics , Radiation Dosage , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adult , California , Child , European Union , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Mathematical Computing , Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence , Pediatrics/trends , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiology/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiology/trends , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/trends
5.
Phys Med ; 24(2): 107-11, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18462970

ABSTRACT

The aim of the work relies on the adjustment of scanning parameters, kV and mAs, in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) to reduce paediatric patient dose whilst keeping the same reference image quality. Only abdomen examinations are employed in this study. The measurement of noise in a region of interest (ROI) inside the liver in a reference adult man has been chosen as an image quality parameter. Paediatric patients are categorised according to the width and thickness of abdomen trunk. A relationship between patient size, image quality and dose reduction has been obtained. The study has been performed at the Meyer Children Hospital (1300 CT paediatric patient/year).


Subject(s)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Biophysical Phenomena , Biophysics , Body Size , Child , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Radiography, Abdominal/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...