Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
1.
Br J Cancer ; 107(8): 1295-301, 2012 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955850

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of participating in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme on quality of life (QOL), neither for participants with a negative nor for those with a positive test result. These findings, however, are important to evaluate the impact of CRC screening. METHODS: Participants from CRC screening trials were sent a questionnaire, which included validated measures on generic health-related QOL, generic anxiety and screen-specific anxiety. Both faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) participants, either with negative or positive test results, were addressed. RESULTS: The response rate was 73% (1289 out of 1772) for FIT and 78% (536 out of 689) for FS participants, with mean ages varying from 63-66 years. Positive FIT participants had worse physical (PCS-12, 47.1 vs 48.3, P=0.02), but equal mental QOL scores (MCS-12, 51.1 vs 51.6, P=0.26). Positive and negative FS participants had similar QOL scores. Both FIT and FS participants with a positive test result reported more screen-specific anxiety than negative FIT and FS participants. Positive and negative FS participants had similar generic anxiety scores. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the burden of participating in CRC screening may be limited. Conducting a prospective study to confirm these results is recommended.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Humans , Immunochemistry , Male , Mass Screening/psychology , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Retrospective Studies , Sigmoidoscopy
2.
Endoscopy ; 44(7): 695-702, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22723185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: While colonoscopy screening is widely used in several European countries and the United States, there are no randomized trials to quantify its benefits. The Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) is a multinational, randomized controlled trial aiming at investigating the effect of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. This paper describes the rationale and design of the NordICC trial. STUDY DESIGN: Men and women aged 55 to 64 years are drawn from the population registries in the participating countries and randomly assigned to either once-only colonoscopy screening with removal of all detected lesions, or no screening (standard of care in the trial regions). All individuals are followed for 15 years after inclusion using dedicated national registries. The primary end points of the trial are cumulative CRC-specific death and CRC incidence during 15 years of follow-up. POWER ANALYSIS: We hypothesize a 50 % CRC mortality-reducing efficacy of the colonoscopy intervention and predict 50 % compliance, yielding a 25 % mortality reduction among those invited to screening. For 90 % power and a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, using a 2:1 randomization, 45 600 individuals will be randomized to control, and 22 800 individuals to the colonoscopy group. Interim analyses of the effect of colonoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality will be performed at 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The aim of the NordICC trial is to quantify the effectiveness of population-based colonoscopy screening. This will allow development of evidence-based guidelines for CRC screening in the general population.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms , Mass Screening/methods , Colonoscopy/psychology , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Patient Selection , Registries , Research Design , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
3.
Gut ; 61(2): 248-54, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21708826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shorter telomeres have been associated with increased risk of malignancy, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Telomere length is heritable and may be an intermediate phenotype linked to genetic susceptibility to CRC. METHODS: In a large sample, the study investigated whether candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 'telomere biology' genes were associated with telomere length in leucocytes. SNP associated with an increased risk of CRC were searched for separately. RESULTS: Carriers of the common allele at SNP rs10936599, near the telomerase RNA component (TERC) locus, had significantly longer telomeres. It was independently found that the same rs10936599 allele was associated with increased risk of both CRC and colorectal adenomas. Neither telomere length nor CRC risk was associated with variation near telomerase reverse transcriptase or other telomere biology genes. In silico analysis showed that SNP rs2293607 was strongly correlated with rs10936599, mapped within TERC transcripts, had a predicted effect on messenger RNA folding and lay at a reported transcription factor binding site. TERC mRNA were expressed, differing only at the alleles of rs2293607, in CRC cell line HCT116. The long-telomere/CRC-risk allele was associated with higher levels of TERC mRNA and the formation of longer telomeres. CONCLUSIONS: Common genetic variation at TERC is associated with both longer telomeres and an increased risk of CRC, a potential mechanism being reduced levels of cell senescence or death. This finding is somewhat paradoxical, given retrospective studies reporting that CRC cases have shorter telomeres than controls. One possibility is that that association actually results from poorer survival in patients with longer telomeres.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , RNA/genetics , Telomerase/genetics , Telomere/chemistry , Adenoma/genetics , Aged , Carcinoma/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genotyping Techniques , HCT116 Cells , Humans , Leukocytes , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Telomere/genetics
4.
J Clin Pathol ; 57(10): 1084-8, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15452165

ABSTRACT

AIM: The biology of colorectal hyperplastic polyps is of considerable relevance, because recent evidence suggests that under certain circumstances hyperplastic polyps may be precursors of neoplasms. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the clinical and molecular characteristics of hyperplastic polyps and neoplastic lesions removed from patients without the hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. METHODS: One hundred and twenty six patients were identified through a series of genetic epidemiological studies. Each patient had at least one neoplastic lesion and one hyperplastic polyp; there was a total of 147 hyperplastic polyps. All lesions were evaluated for K-ras mutations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, and microsatellite instability. RESULTS: K-ras mutation was detected in 15 (10%) hyperplastic polyps, all from the rectosigmoid colon. No hyperplastic polyp had APC LOH or microsatellite instability. Patients with adenomas or carcinomas showing K-ras mutations were not more likely to have hyperplastic polyps with K-ras mutations. The average number of adenomas did not differ between those patients with hyperplastic polyps with K-ras mutations and those without K-ras mutations. There was no association between the hyperplastic polyp and the adenoma regarding the colon segments from which the two lesions were removed. CONCLUSIONS: The sporadic hyperplastic polyp is a lesion with limited molecular change and no relation to patients' neoplastic lesions.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/genetics , Carcinoma/genetics , Colon/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colonic Polyps/genetics , Adenoma/pathology , Aged , Carcinoma/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonoscopy , Female , Genes, APC , Genes, ras , Humans , Hyperplasia/pathology , Loss of Heterozygosity , Male , Microsatellite Repeats , Middle Aged , Mutation , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
6.
J Pathol ; 193(3): 303-9, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11241408

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the molecular genetic changes in the Ki-ras and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes between adenomas and carcinomas removed from the same patients. This comparison of benign and malignant tissue would enhance understanding of the progression of molecular changes during the development of colorectal malignancy and similarities between paired lesions could be indicative of a common aetiology. The basic procedures used were DNA extraction from wax blocks of removed tissue, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gel electrophoresis for mutations in the Ki-ras gene using single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP); amplification of a CA repeat marker was used to assess for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the APC gene. The main findings in 100 adenoma and carcinoma pairs for the Ki-ras gene were as follows: the frequency of Ki-ras mutation in the adenomas increased with increasing villous component, but did not vary in the paired carcinomas; the frequency of Ki-ras mutation in villous adenomas was greater than in carcinomas; and when both paired lesions had Ki-ras mutations, only 44% had the identical mutation. For the APC gene, the incidence of LOH in the adenomas did not vary by histological type; the LOH status of the adenoma was associated with that of the paired carcinoma; but when both paired lesions had LOH of the APC gene, only 50% had LOH for the same allele. In conclusion, these data on paired adenomas and carcinomas suggest that a Ki-ras mutation is not a consistent finding between the adenoma and carcinoma from the same bowel. The development of LOH of the APC gene is a slightly more consistent finding between the pair, but is not always allelic-specific.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Genes, APC , Genes, ras , Adenoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Loss of Heterozygosity , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational
8.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(9): 839-45, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11075873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: An association of increased risk of ovarian cancer with use of antidepressants or benzodiazepine tranquilizers has been reported from a case-control study. We assessed the association between ovarian cancer risk and the use of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), phenothiazine antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines, in data from the Case-Control Surveillance Study. METHODS: From 1976 through 1998, data were collected from hospital patients in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore based on demographic factors, reproductive and medical history, and medication use. In the present analyses, cases of epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 748) were compared with cancer controls (n = 1496) and noncancer controls admitted for trauma and acute infection (n = 1496). We estimated Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios adjusted for age, study center, and year of interview. RESULTS: Odds ratios for regular use (at least 4 days/week for at least 1 month) were compatible with 1.0 for every drug class. For tricyclics and benzodiazepines the upper 95% confidence limits were less than 1.6. For phenothiazines the upper limit was 2.6 with cancer controls and 1.4 with noncancer controls. Only five cases used SSRIs, yielding unstable results. Odds ratios were not increased among women who had used any drug class for at least 5 years, nor among women who had first used them 10 or more years previously. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support an association between regular use of any of the drugs under study with ovarian cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/chemically induced , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Phenothiazines/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Risk Assessment , United States
9.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 9(9): 933-7, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11008911

ABSTRACT

A recent case-control study raised the hypothesis that acetaminophen use 1 day or more per week for at least 6 months reduces the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We assessed analgesic use in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer risk using data from our case-control surveillance study of medication use and cancer. Patients were interviewed in hospitals in Baltimore, Boston, New York, and Philadelphia during 1976-1998. We compared 780 women with epithelial ovarian cancer to 2053 cancer controls and 2570 noncancer controls. For acetaminophen use 1 day or more per week for at least 6 months, the odds ratio estimate was 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.4) derived with cancer controls and 1.0 (0.6-1.5) with noncancer controls. Estimates for more frequent and longer term use were also compatible with 1.0. The odds ratios among patients with metastatic ovarian cancer were reduced but not statistically significant. The odds ratio for use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 4 or more days per week for at least 5 years, 0.5, was statistically significant. The present results provide only weak support for a reduction in the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among acetaminophen users. They raise the possibility of an inverse association with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/prevention & control , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology
10.
11.
J Cancer Educ ; 15(2): 86-90, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10879897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessment of smoking status and identification of those most likely to continue smoking are important in the management of patients who have bladder cancer, because continued smoking following diagnosis and treatment increases the likelihood of treatment-related complications, recurrence, second primary malignancies, and morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Patients (n = 224) receiving follow-up care of previously treated bladder cancers completed a brief written survey assessing their post-diagnosis smoking patterns. RESULTS: Despite the risks of continued smoking, 69% of the patients who had been active smokers at the time of diagnosis (n = 84) reported smoking at some point following the diagnosis and 45% reported smoking at the time of assessment. Patients diagnosed at earlier stages were more likely to continue smoking. Patients diagnosed at later stages were 2.80 times more likely to be continuous abstainers than those diagnosed sooner (95% CI, 1.08-7.25). CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the need to assess smoking status and provide smoking-cessation advice and counseling within routine comprehensive care of bladder cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis
12.
N Engl J Med ; 342(24): 1766-72, 2000 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10852998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After patients have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, it is uncertain whether colonoscopic examination or a barium enema is the better method of surveillance. METHODS: As part of the National Polyp Study, we offered colonoscopic examination and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance to patients with newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Although barium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not know the results. RESULTS: A total of 973 patients underwent one or more colonoscopic examinations for surveillance. In the case of 580 of these patients, we performed 862 paired colonoscopic examinations and barium-enema examinations that met the requirements of the protocol. The findings on barium enema were positive in 222 (26 percent) of the paired examinations, including 139 of the 392 colonoscopic examinations in which one or more polyps were detected (rate of detection, 35 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 31 to 40 percent). The proportion of examinations in which adenomatous polyps were detected by barium enema colonoscopy was significantly related to the size of the adenomas (P=0.009); the rate was 32 percent for colonoscopic examinations in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.5 cm or less, 53 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.6 to 1.0 cm, and 48 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected exceeded 1.0 cm. Among the 139 paired examinations with positive results on barium enema and negative results on colonoscopic examination in the same location, 19 additional polyps, 12 of which were adenomas, were detected on colonoscopic reexamination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, colonoscopic examination is a more effective method of surveillance than double-contrast barium enema.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Barium Sulfate , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Enema , Adenoma/surgery , Colonic Polyps/surgery , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Single-Blind Method
13.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(3): 249-55, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10782659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We undertook the present analyses to determine whether family history of colorectal cancer in a parent or sibling modifies the inverse association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use with colorectal cancer risk. METHODS: We used data from two case-control studies of colorectal cancer. The hospital-based Case Control Surveillance Study included 1526 patients with primary colorectal cancer, 4192 cancer controls and 6036 noncancer controls. A population-based study conducted in Massachusetts enrolled 1201 incident cases of colorectal cancer and 1201 community controls. Data on NSAID use and risk factors for colorectal cancer were collected by interview. RESULTS: In both studies there was a reduction in the odds ratios among subjects who used NSAIDs regularly continuing into the previous year, regardless of family history. In the Case Control Surveillance data, the odds ratio was 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9) among subjects with a family history and 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.7) among subjects without a family history. The comparable odds ratios in the Massachusetts data were 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9) and 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that regular continuing NSAID use is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer among persons with a family history of the disease, as well as those without such a history.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 9(1): 119-23, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10667472

ABSTRACT

Regular continuing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has been associated with a reduction in risk of large bowel cancer in many studies, including our Case-Control Surveillance Study of medication use and cancer risk. We assessed the relation of NSAID use to the risk of digestive cancers at sites other than the large bowel in this database. Nurse-interviewers administered questionnaires to patients admitted to hospitals in four centers from 1977 to 1998. Cases comprised 1149 patients with cancers of the pancreas (n = 504), stomach (n = 254), esophagus (n = 215), gallbladder (n = 125), or liver (n = 51). Controls were 5952 patients admitted for trauma or acute infection. History of NSAID use was elicited by questions about indications for use. Multiple logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for categories of regular NSAID use (at least 4 days/week for at least 3 months) relative to never use. The OR for regular use initiated at least 1 year before admission and continuing into that year was reduced for stomach cancer (OR = 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6) and was compatible with 1.0 for other sites. The ORs for regular continuing use of at least 5 years duration were < 1.0 for cancers of the stomach, pancreas, esophagus, and gallbladder but were statistically significant only for stomach cancer. These data suggest that regular continuing NSAID use may be associated with reduced risk of stomach cancer. For the other sites, the data are consistent with no effect of NSAID use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Digestive System Neoplasms/etiology , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Databases as Topic , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Gallbladder Neoplasms/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms , Intestine, Large , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology
15.
Am J Epidemiol ; 150(8): 861-8, 1999 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10522657

ABSTRACT

In laboratory studies, some antidepressants caused increased growth of mammary tumors. The relation of use of these drugs to the development of breast cancer was examined in a hospital-based case-control study. Information, including lifetime medication history, was collected by interview from 5,814 women with primary breast cancer diagnosed within the previous year, 5,095 women with primary malignancies of other sites, and 5,814 women with other conditions. Relative risks were estimated by using unconditional multiple logistic regression for regular use (> or =4 days per week for > or =4 weeks beginning > or =1 year before admission) of antidepressants and structurally similar drugs. With reference to never use of each drug, relative risks were statistically compatible with 1.0 for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), tricyclics, other antidepressants, phenothiazines, and antihistamines; results were very similar using both control groups. There were no significant increases in risk for any category of regular use, stratified according to cumulative duration of use or time interval since the most recent use or for any individual drug within the broader classes. However, the estimate for regular SSRI use in the previous year, 1.8, was of borderline statistical significance (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 3.3). The findings do not support an overall association between the use of antidepressants, phenothiazines, or antihistamines and breast cancer. However, the results for SSRIs are not entirely reassuring.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Phenothiazines/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Prev Med ; 29(2): 72-6, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10446030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the risk of breast cancer is unclear. We assessed the association in a hospital-based case-control study. METHODS: The cases (n = 6558) were compared with cancer controls (n = 3296) and noncancer controls admitted for trauma or acute infection (n = 2925). Odds ratios were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: For women who used NSAIDs regularly beginning at least 1 year before admission, the odds ratios (OR) were 0.8 (95% CI 0.7, 1.0) with cancer controls and 0.7 (95% CI 0.6, 0.9) with noncancer controls. With noncancer controls, there was a statistically significant decreasing trend in the odds ratios as duration of use increased, whereas with cancer controls there was not. The reduction in risk for regular use was accounted for largely by a reduced odds ratio for one study center (Boston), which contributed 9% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The data are compatible with a small reduction in risk associated with regular NSAID use. However, inconsistencies in the data detract from a causal interpretation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Baltimore/epidemiology , Boston/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , New York/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Epidemiology ; 9(6): 669-71, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9799180

ABSTRACT

We investigated whether survival was related to recent childbirth or parity in a cohort of 540 women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 45 years who were followed for up to 14 years. Women who had given birth within 2 years before their diagnosis of breast cancer were at increased risk of dying, compared with nulliparous women, with an adjusted relative risk of 3.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-5.4). There was a moderate association of parity with mortality, with an adjusted relative risk of 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-2.9) for women with three or more births, compared with nulliparous women.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Parity , Pregnancy , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors
18.
Cancer ; 83(1): 76-88, 1998 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9655296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether the timing of tumor excision relative to the menstrual cycle influences the survival of patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: Premenopausal patients (n=614) who had surgery for invasive, nonmetastatic breast carcinoma during the period 1978-1988 participated in an epidemiologic survey, reporting their menstrual cycle length and the date of their last menses. We ascertained deaths from any cause before 1993. RESULTS: Using Cox modeling, we found a nonlinear variation in the relative risk (RR) of death according to the timing of surgery during the menstrual cycle. The curve was best described by a cosine transformation of a 28-day cycle. For patients who had breast carcinoma surgery on the estimated day of ovulation, the risk of death was 0.59 (95% confidence limits [CLI=0.39-0.89, P=0.013) compared with patients who had surgery at the approximate time of menses. We observed this for patients treated in 1978-1981 (RR=0.43, 95% CL=0.23-0.83, P=0.011) and 1982-1983 (0.25, 95% CL=0.10-0.63, P=0.003), but not in 1984-1988 (1.48, 95% CL=0.64-3.4). The difference observed for 1984-1988 was explained by a significant improvement in the mortality rate (P=0.0004) for women whose surgery took place during menses or near to the date predicted for the next menses. No such improvement for women who underwent breast carcinoma surgery around the time of ovulation was observed during the period 1984-1988. These changes were not explained by the performance of lumpectomy or the increasing interval between biopsy and tumor excision. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the survival curve contradicted the idea that it could be explained by levels of circulating estradiol or progesterone. Because observations that surgery was affected by menstrual timing seem not to have persisted beyond the mid-1980s, this study should not be used to support recommendations that surgeons perform breast carcinoma surgery on any particular day of the menstrual cycle.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Menstrual Cycle , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Premenopause , Survival Rate , Time Factors
19.
JAMA ; 279(13): 1000-4, 1998 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9533498

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Recent epidemiologic studies have raised the concern that calcium channel blocker use may increase the risk of cancer overall and of several specific cancers. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether calcium channel blocker use increases the risk of cancer overall and of specific cancers. DESIGN: Case-control drug surveillance study based on data collected from 1983 to 1996. SETTING: Hospitals in Baltimore, Md, New York, NY, and Philadelphia, Pa. PATIENTS: A total of 9513 patients aged 40 to 69 years with incident cancer of various sites and 6492 controls aged 40 to 69 years admitted for nonmalignant conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident cancer overall and 23 specific cancers. RESULTS: Calcium channel blocker use was unrelated to the risk of cancer overall (relative risk [RR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-1.3). Use was not significantly associated with increased risks of individual cancers, including those previously implicated, except cancer of the kidney (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 -2.7). Recent use, use for 5 or more years, and use of individual calcium channel blocker drugs were also not associated with cancer incidence. Use of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was generally unrelated to cancer overall or individual cancers, but both were associated with kidney cancer (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; and RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the use of calcium channel blockers is unrelated to an increase in the overall risk of cancer or of individual cancers, except kidney cancer, which has been associated with hypertension or drugs to treat hypertension in previous studies.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Risk
20.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(1): 83-8, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9486467

ABSTRACT

Experimental and epidemiologic evidence have suggested that phenacetin use increases the risk of transitional cell cancers of the urinary tract. The drug is no longer marketed but a commonly used metabolite, acetaminophen, has been linked recently to an increased risk of renal cancer. We assessed the relation of acetaminophen use to the risk of transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract and of renal cell cancer with data from a hospital-based study of cancers and medication use conducted from 1976-96 in the eastern United States. We compared 498 cases of transitional cell cancer and 383 cases of renal cell cancer with 8,149 noncancer controls and 6,499 cancer controls and controlled confounding factors with logistic regression. For transitional cell cancer, the relative risk (RR) estimate for regular acetaminophen use that had begun at least a year before admission was 1.1 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.6-1.9) based on noncancer controls, and 0.9 (CI = 0.5-1.6) based on cancer controls. RR estimates for use that lasted at least five years, and for nonregular use, were also close to 1.0. For renal cell cancer, the corresponding estimates were again close to 1.0. Our results suggest that acetaminophen, as used in present study population, does not influence the risk of transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract or of renal cell cancer.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/etiology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/etiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Urologic Neoplasms/etiology , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Urologic Neoplasms/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...