Association between superior longitudinal fasciculus, motor recovery, and motor outcome after stroke: a cohort study.

Introduction: Parieto-frontal interactions are mediated by the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and are crucial to integrate visuomotor information and mediate fine motor control. In this study, we aimed to characterize the relation of white matter integrity of both parts of the SLF (SLF I and SLF II) to both motor outcome and recovery and its evolution over time in stroke patients with upper limb motor deficits. Materials and methods: Fractional anisotropy (FA) values over the SLF I, SLF II, and corticospinal tract (CST) and upper limb motor performance evaluated by both the upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment score and maximum grip strength were measured for 16 patients at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks poststroke. FA changes were assessed over time using repeated-measures Friedman ANOVA, and correlations between motor recovery, motor outcome at 12 weeks, and FA values in the CST, SLF I, and SLF II at 3 weeks were performed using Spearman's rank-order correlation. Results: FA values in the affected hemisphere's SLF I and SLF II at 3 weeks correlated with motor recovery at 12 weeks when assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper limb extremity (rho: 0.502, p: 0.04 and rho: 0.510, p: 0.04, respectively) but not when assessed by grip strength. FA values in the SLF I and SLF II were not correlated with motor outcomes. FA values in the SLF II in the affected hemisphere changed significantly over time (p: 0.016). Conclusion: Both SLF I and SLF II appeared to participate in poststroke motor recovery of complex movements but not in the motor outcome. These results argue that visually/spatially oriented motor tasks as well as more complex motor tasks using parietal associative areas should be used for poststroke rehabilitation strategies.

Late but not early seizures impact negatively early post stroke recovery: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Seizures are a frequent complication of strokes. The initial severity of the stroke is a risk factor for both seizure occurrence and poor functional recovery. AIM: To determine whether epilepsy has a negative impact on functional recovery or is just a proxy for the initial severity of the stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective case-control study in 408 consecutive patients hospitalized in the neurological rehabilitation department of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital for rehabilitation of a recent stroke between 1999 and 2019. We matched 1:1 stroke patients with and without seizures according to numerous variables that may influence the outcome: type of stroke (ischemic vs hemorrhagic (ICH)), type of endovascular treatment performed (thrombolysis, thrombectomy), exact location of the stroke (arterial territory for ischemic strokes, lobar territory for ICH), extent of the stroke, side of the stroke, and age at the time of stroke. Two criteria were used to judge the impact on neurological recovery: the change in modified Rankin score between entry and the discharge from the rehabilitation department, and the length of stay. Seizures were divided into early (within 7 days of stroke) and late (after 7 days) seizures. RESULTS: We accurately matched 110 stroke patients with and without seizures. Compared to seizure-free matched stroke patients, stroke patients with late seizures had a poorer neurological functional recovery in terms of Rankin score evolution (p = 0.011*) and length of stay (p = 0.004*). The occurrence of early seizures had no significant impact on functional recovery criteria. CONCLUSION: Late seizures, that is, stroke-related epilepsy, have a negative impact on early rehabilitation, whereas early symptomatic seizures do not negatively impact functional recovery. These results reinforce the recommendation not to treat early seizures.

Evaluation of a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for upper extremity function after stroke: The Mini-ARAT.

OBJECTIVES: (i) to create a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test scale, (ii) to investigate its psychometric properties compared to the original scale and (iii) to externally validate it within an independent cohort. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTINGS: Two University Hospitals (France, Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: 47 patients with poststroke motor deficits of the upper limb coming from two different sites were included and divided into two cohorts (n = 22 for the construction cohort; n = 25 for the validation cohort). MAIN MEASURES: We used the first cohort to build the Mini-ARAT by shortening the Action Research Arm Test scale on the basis of ceiling/floor effects and collinearity of the subscales. We studied its reliability, validity, and responsiveness and performed an external validation with the second cohort. RESULTS: The Mini-ARAT consisted of 2 subscales from the original Action Research Arm Test scale (Grip and Pinch). Internal consistency (α = 87) and inter-rater reliability (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.01) were good and similar to those of the Action Research Arm Test scale. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Mini-ARAT was 9 points. The predictive validity in the construction and validation cohorts showed good correlation between the Mini-ARAT at baseline and the Fugl Meyer at 3 months (rho, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.49-0.90, p < 0.01, and 0.58, 0.19-0.96, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Mini-ARAT is a time-effective tool able to capture the dynamics of motor deficits with high reliability and consistency, providing excellent information about residual motor functions, which is critically important for clinical and research purposes.

The inter-rater reliability of the Italian version of Aphasia Rapid Test (ART) for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The Aphasia Rapid Test (ART) is a screening questionnaire used for examining language in acute stroke patients. The ART was initially developed and validated in French. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of Italian ART. METHODS: The original version of the ART was translated into Italian. The inter-rater reliability was assessed by two independent neurologists who were blind to each other's ratings in 52 acute post-stroke patients. RESULTS: The 52 patients (28 men, 24 women; mean age 73.73 ± 28.99 years) were included within 1 week of stroke onset (46 ischemic, 6 hemorrhagic), as assessed by clinical examination and confirmed by CT and/or MRI. The mean (± SD) ART value was 9.38 (± 9.26) for rater 1 and 9 (±9.31) for rater 2. The inter-rater agreement was very good, with a coefficient of concordance of 0.99 (95% CI 0.986-0.995; p < 0.0001) and a weighted kappa of 0.878 and a quadratic weighted kappa of 0.983. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the cross-cultural adaptation of the French version of the ART was successful in an Italian-speaking population.

Critical brain regions related to post-stroke aphasia severity identified by early diffusion imaging are not the same when predicting short- and long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the critical brain regions associated with 7-days, 3 and 6-months aphasia severity using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in acute post-stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a voxel-based ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) analysis to identify the critical brain areas correlated with aphasia at the acute (7-days outcome) and chronic stages (3 and 6-months). The location of these areas was compared with the trajectory of the dorsal (the arcuate fasciculus) and the ventral language pathways (the inferior fronto-occipital and the uncinate fasciculi). RESULTS: Disconnections of the language fasciculi, which were correlated with aphasia outcome, were not the same for the 7-days outcome (disconnection of the ventral stream) and the chronic outcome (3 and 6 months) (disconnection of the dorsal and ventral streams). CONCLUSION: Routine clinical images can be merged with atlases of anatomical connectivity to provide new insights about the relationship between the lesion location and aphasia severity.

Medial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis is a distinctive syndrome.

Epileptic syndromes are distinctive disorders with specific features, which when taken together, permit a specific diagnosis. There is actually a debate on that medial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis is an epileptic syndrome. To address this issue, we searched for discriminative semiological features between temporal lobe epilepsy patients with hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-HS patients or group 1), TLE patients with medial structural lesion other than hippocampal sclerosis or in MRI-negative cases with medial onset on further investigations (group 2) and lateral TLE patients (LTLE or group 3). We retrospectively collected data from medical and EEG-video records of 523 TLE patients, referred for surgery to the Pitié-Salpêtrière Epileptology Unit between 1991 and 2014. We identified 389 patients belonging to group 1, 61 patients belonging to group 2, and 73 patients belonging to group 3 and performed a comparative analysis of their clinical data and surgical outcomes. TLE-HS patients (group 1): (1) began epilepsy earlier (11 ± 9 vs. 20 ± 10 vs. 15 ± 9 years); (2) exhibited more frequently early febrile convulsions (FC) (59 vs 7 vs 5%); (3) presented more: ictal gestural automatisms (90 vs 54 vs 67%), dystonic posturing (47 vs 20 vs 23%), and secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) (70 vs 44% vs 48%) as compared to both groups 2 and 3 patients (all p < 0.001). With respect to auras, abdominal visceral auras were more reported by TLE-HS than by LTLE patients (49 vs 16%). Three cardinal criteria correctly classified 94% of patients into TLE-HS group: history of FC, dystonic posturing, and secondary GTCS. Postoperative outcome was significantly better in TLE-HS group than in the two other groups (p = 0.03 and 0.003). Our study demonstrates that cardinal criteria are reliably helpful to distinguish patients with TLE-HS from those with other TLE and may allow considering TLE-HS as a distinctive syndrome.

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy in partial epilepsy: a review.

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked epileptic seizures. The majority of people given a diagnosis of epilepsy have a good prognosis, but 20-30 % will develop drug-resistant epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory treatment that is used as an adjunctive therapy for treating people with medically refractory epilepsy. It consists of chronic intermittent electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve, delivered by a programmable pulse generator (Neuro-Cybernetic Prosthesis). In 1997, the Food and Drug Administration approved VNS as adjunctive treatment for medically refractory partial-onset seizures in adults and adolescents. This article reviews the literature from 1988 to nowadays. We discuss thoroughly the anatomy and physiology of vagus nerve and the potential mechanisms of actions and clinical applications involved in VNS therapy, as well as the management, safety, tolerability and effectiveness of VNS therapy. VNS for partial seizures appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment in adult and pediatric patients. People noted improvements in feelings of well-being, alertness, memory and thinking skills, as well as mood. The adverse effect profile is substantially different from the adverse effect profile associated with antiepileptic drugs, making VNS a potential alternative for patients with difficulty tolerating antiepileptic drug adverse effects. Despite the passing years and the advent of promising neuromodulation technologies, VNS remains an efficacy treatment for people with medically refractory epilepsy. Past and ongoing investigations in other indications have provided signals of the therapeutic potential in a wide variety of conditions.

Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review.

Physicians have been increasingly relying on noninvasive imaging methods to grade carotid stenosis. The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and CT angiography (CTA) versus intra-arterial angiography (IA) has been assessed in many studies and at least two meta-analyses. Here, we performed a systematic review of studies that compared DUS to CTA. In a PubMed review of the literature from 2000 to 2009, we found 12 studies that compared DUS and CTA-based grading of carotid stenosis. Only 4 of them included at least 20 patients and provided data to classify the diseased arteries into the following categories: mild, moderate or severe NASCET stenosis or occlusion. We extracted 431 arteries from 244 patients (range per study: 48-164). It was not possible to distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic stenoses. Nearly half arteries had severe stenosis (46% based on DUS and 43% based on CTA). The weighted kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94), and the accuracy was 0.78. When the arteries were classified into medical and potentially surgical groups, the kappa was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83), and the accuracy was 0.89. Overall, 17% of the stenoses classified as medical based on DUS were reclassified as surgical based on CTA and 14% of the stenoses classified as medical based on CTA were reclassified as surgical based on DUS. The sparse available data comparing DUS and CTA suggest that the grading of a carotid stenosis as medical or potentially surgical remains uncertain in a relatively high proportion of patients.

Binocular control of saccades in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

We focused on the saccade disconjugate control in idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients. Our data showed that in IPD patients the saccade precision was differently impaired in the two eyes--namely, the disconjugate component was larger than in controls--more for the remembered than for the reflexive task.