Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
J Emerg Nurs ; 45(4): 374-385, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30929950

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 136.9 million ED visits in 2015, of which 21.4 million (15.6%) were by patients who were 65 or older. This US population demographic is expected to grow by 112% over the next 40 years, becoming just below 25% of the total US population. Emergency nurses will play an increasingly important part in the development of nursing care for geriatric patients. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' perception of their ability to care for geriatric patients in the emergency setting. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods sequential design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus group data, which were analyzed separately and then given equal priority during the data-interpretation phase. RESULTS: Less than 50% of survey respondents (N = 1,610) reported geriatric-specific screenings, accommodations, and communication with outside agencies as "always available" in their care settings. Qualitative analysis (N = 23) yielded the categories of Triage/Assessment, Care in the Emergency Environment, Discharge Planning, and Facilitators and Barriers, which generally reflected the trajectory of care for the older patient. The overarching concern was keeping patients safe in both the community and in the emergency department. DISCUSSION: Emergency departments should develop integrated systems to facilitate appropriate care of older patients. Identified barriers to improved care include a lack of integration between emergency care and community care, deficits in geriatric-specific education, inconsistent use of early screening for frailty, and lack of resources in the emergency care environment to intervene appropriately.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Nursing/standards , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Nurs Manage ; 50(1): 13-16, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601381

ABSTRACT

The following manuscript is the winning 2018 Richard Hader Visionary Leader Award entry submitted to Nursing Management in recognition of Lori A. Colineri, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, CNO of the Southern Region for RWJBarnabas Health (RWJBH). Lori was formally recognized for her achievements before the Keynote Address on September 26 at Congress2018 in Lake Buena Vista, Fla., where she received the award, sponsored by Hackensack Meridian Health.


Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Leadership , Nurse Administrators , Humans
3.
J Emerg Nurs ; 45(1): 54-66.e2, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529291

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73% of all homicides and 50% of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. METHODS: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. RESULTS: Between 21.8 and 43.5% of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. DISCUSSION: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Workplace Violence/psychology , Wounds, Gunshot/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Firearms/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Young Adult
4.
Orthop Nurs ; 37(6): 339-345, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30451767

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to describe in detail how an academic hospital system took on the challenge of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention. A VTE Prevention Task Force was formed in response to an increased incidence of hospital acquired DVTs. The interdisciplinary team reviewed the literature and examined the current state of organizational venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention to identify gaps in process, determine opportunity and approaches for practice and process improvements, and develop standardized VTE prevention protocols. The article discusses the process taken in developing a highly motivated interdisciplinary team, the implementation of a care bundle, and the highly effective educational and surveillance tools used that helped improve patient outcomes by driving down the VTE rate.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols/standards , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Walking , Hospitals , Humans , Orthopedic Nursing , Patient Care Bundles/nursing , Quality Improvement , Risk Factors
6.
J Emerg Nurs ; 44(5): 491-498, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29502904

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Screening for suicidality is a critical nursing function at the initial ED encounter. Suicide is the tenth leading cause of death in the United States, and a substantial percentage of people who die by suicide present for health care in the year before their deaths. The emergency department provides health care professionals with a critical opportunity to identify patients at risk for suicide and intervene appropriately. METHODS: Qualitative exploratory study using focus-group data. FINDINGS: Effective and accurate suicidality assessment occurs not by asking a single question but also with the assessment of patient behaviors and presentation (appearance, hygiene, etc). When emergency nurses suspected occult suicidality, additional actions (finding private space, keeping patients safe, and passing on information), took priority. DISCUSSION: The Joint Commission recommends using clinical judgment tools for the final determination of safety for a patient at suspected risk of suicide, as research findings suggest that a screening tool can identify persons at risk for suicide more reliably than a clinician's personal judgment. Our participants report that when they assessed suicide risk at triage, it was usually by asking a single question such as "Do you have thoughts or plans to harm yourself?" and they expressed concern about the effectiveness of doing so. Participants described their efforts to improve suicide screening across the duration of the patient's ED stay through an iterative process of assessment that included further probing and eliciting, evaluating, and reacting to the patient's response.


Subject(s)
Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Nursing Assessment , Risk Assessment/methods , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide , Focus Groups , Humans , Qualitative Research , Triage
7.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 32(2): 97-102, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29419582

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between resilience and coping in frontline nurses working in a healthcare system that has recently undergone a merger. BACKGROUND: Hospital mergers are common in the current healthcare environment. Mergers can provide hospital nurses the opportunity to use and develop positive coping strategies to help remain resilient during times of change. METHODS: An anonymous-survey, quantitative, exploratory, descriptive study design was used. Data were obtained from an electronic survey that was made available to all nurses working in a 3-hospital system located in the northeast. RESULTS: Overall, the results showed that, when nurses reported using positive coping strategies, they report higher levels of resilience. The levels of resilience also varied from campus to campus. The campus that has been through 2 recent mergers reported the highest levels of resilience. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, during times of change in the workplace, if nurses are encouraged to use positive coping strategies, they may have higher levels of resilience. This changing environment provides the clinical nurse specialists/clinical nurse educators the opportunity to foster and support frontline nurses in the use of healthy coping strategies and to help improve and maintain a high level of resilience, which is critical in today's healthcare environment.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Health Facility Merger , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 39: 33-39, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28958419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine recognizes that the workplace environment is a crucial factor in the ability of nurses to provide safe and effective care, and thus interactions that affect the quality and safety of the work environment require exploration. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use situational analysis to develop a grounded theory of workplace bullying as it manifests specifically in the emergency care setting. METHODS: This study used a grounded theory methodology called situational analysis. 44 emergency RNs were recruited to participate in one of 4 focus group sessions, which were transcribed in their entirety, and, along with field notes, served as the dataset. RESULTS: This grounded theory describes the characteristics of human actors and their reactions to conditions in the practice environment that lead to greater or lesser levels of bullying, and the responses to bullying as it occurs in U.S. emergency departments. DISCUSSION: Workplace bullying is a significant factor in the dynamics of patient care, nursing work culture, and nursing retention. The impact on patient care cannot be overestimated, both in terms of errors, substandard care, and the negative effects of high turnover of experienced RNs who leave, compounded by the inexperience of newly hired RNs. An assessment of hospital work environments should include nurse perceptions of workplace bullying, and interventions should focus on effective managerial processes for handling workplace bullying. Future research should include testing of the theoretical coherence of the model, and the testing of bullying interventions to determine the effect on workplace environment, nursing intent to leave/retention, and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bullying , Emergency Nursing , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Aged , Burnout, Professional/etiology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Grounded Theory , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Workplace/standards
9.
J Emerg Nurs ; 44(3): 258-266, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28750891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Triage, as it is understood in the context of the emergency department, is the first and perhaps the most formal stage of the initial patient encounter. Bottlenecks during intake and long waiting room times have been linked to higher rates of patients leaving without being seen. The solution in many emergency departments has been to collect less information at triage or use an "immediate bedding" or "pull until full" approach, in which patients are placed in treatment areas as they become available without previous screening. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' understanding of-and experience with-the triage process, and to identify facilitators and barriers to accurate acuity assignation. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study using focus-group interviews (N = 26). RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) "Sick or not sick," (2) "Competency/qualifications," (3) "Triaging the emergency department, not the patient," (4) "The unexpected," and (5) "Barriers and facilitators." DISCUSSION: Our participants described processes that were unit- and/or nurse-dependent and were manipulations of the triage system to "fix" problems in ED flow, rather than a standard application of a triage system. Our participants reported that, in practice, the use of triage scales to determine acuity and route patients to appropriate resources varies in accuracy and application among emergency nurses and in their respective emergency departments. Nurses in this sample reported a prevalence of "quick look" triage approaches that do not rely on physiologic data to make acuity decisions. Future research should focus on intervention and comparison studies examining the effect of staffing, nurse experience, hospital policies, and length of shift on the accuracy of triage decision making. Contribution to Emergency Nursing Practice.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nursing Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Triage/methods , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , United States
10.
Adv Emerg Nurs J ; 38(2): 133-46, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139135

ABSTRACT

Emergency department (ED) nurses practice in environments that are highly charged and unpredictable in nature and can precipitate conflict between the necessary prescribed actions and the individual's sense of what is morally the right thing to do. As a consequence of multiple moral dilemmas, ED staff nurses are at risk for experiencing distress and how they cope with these challenges may impact their practice. To examine moral distress in ED nurses and its relationship to coping in that specialty group. Using survey methods approach. One hundred ninety-eight ED nurses completed a moral distress, coping, and demographic collection instruments. Advanced statistical analysis was completed to look at relationships between the variables. Data analysis did show that moral distress is present in ED nurses (M = 80.19, SD = 53.27), and when separated into age groups, the greater the age, the less the experience of moral distress. A positive relationship between moral distress and some coping mechanisms and the ED environment was also noted. This study's findings suggest that ED nurses experience moral distress and could receive some benefit from utilization of appropriate coping skills. This study also suggests that the environment in which ED nurses practice has a significant impact on the experience of moral distress. Because health care is continuing to evolve, it is critical that issues such as moral distress and coping be studied in ED nurses to help eliminate human suffering.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Emergency Nursing , Morals , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 30(3): 167-71, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27055039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to discuss the development and implementation of a nursing morbidity and mortality (M&M) monthly conference at an academic medical center. Nursing M&M was developed as a peer review process in which cases where clinical errors or misjudgments that have occurred are reviewed in a nonpunitive setting. The cases are selected based on the National Database for Nursing Quality Indicators and the implications they have for the quality of nursing practice. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Morbidity and mortality conferences are well documented in the physician arena as an avenue to review and discuss adverse events. There is little published in the literature related to nursing using this peer review format and what impact this forum can have on clinical outcomes. Clinical nurse specialists and clinical nurse educators are oftentimes positioned to help implement this type of forum and evaluate the impact that it has for the staff and patients that they work with. DESCRIPTION: The clinical nurse specialists/clinical nurse educators at this fourth-time designated Magnet® academic medical center facilitate the monthly M&M and select 4 to 5 cases to present. At the end of each brief presentation, the outcome is determined to be either preventable or unpreventable. Action items for educational needs are also identified. OUTCOMES: Nursing M&M has been well attended over the past year. Since its inception, multiple practice changes have been implemented. Based on the positive feedback from the evaluations, this monthly conference has become standing practice in the institution.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/organization & administration , Medical Errors/nursing , Nurse Clinicians , Nurse's Role , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Databases, Factual , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Morbidity , Mortality , Nursing Evaluation Research , Patient Outcome Assessment , Peer Review , United States/epidemiology
12.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 19(6): 655-8, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26583628

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to describe a peer-to-peer program and the outcomes of interventions to reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients in bone marrow transplantation, medical, and surgical oncology units. The article reviews the process and describes tools used to achieve success in a Magnet®-designated academic medical center.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Humans
13.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 29(1): E11-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25469444

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to describe the development and implementation of an innovative Summer Study Hall program developed by clinical nurse specialists (CNSs)/clinical nurse educators (CNEs) in an urban academic medical center. BACKGROUND: The program was implemented as a strategy to give nursing students the opportunity to enhance their clinical skills. The chosen skills are considered high risk for hospitals and have major impact on the American Nurses Association National Database for Nursing Quality Indicators, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-acquired urinary tract infections. The secondary purpose of the program is to provide a venue to be able to work with potential employees and determine if they have the potential to be promising employees. METHODS: A group of 20 students voluntarily met with a CNS/CNE weekly for 4 weeks in a simulation laboratory to review and demonstrate skills such as Foley catheter insertion and suctioning. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: The program was very well received by participants as well as by the CNS/CNE faculty. The program will continue annually, and some modifications have been made to include nonclinical topics such as professional development skills (eg, interviewing skills and résumé preparation).


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing/organization & administration , Faculty, Nursing/organization & administration , Nurse Clinicians/organization & administration , Program Development , Academic Medical Centers , Clinical Competence , Forecasting , Humans , New Jersey , Nursing/trends , Nursing Evaluation Research , Students, Nursing
14.
Adv Emerg Nurs J ; 36(4): 325-34, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25356893

ABSTRACT

The literature supports family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and its many perceived benefits for patients and their families. It also suggests that, overall, health care professionals are supportive of this practice. There have not been any published studies to date that have looked at the perception of family presence from the multidisciplinary resuscitation or code team's perspective. The purpose of this study was to describe the multidisciplinary care provider's understanding and perceived barriers of family presence during CPR in an academic medical center. This study is a quantitative, exploratory, descriptive study that utilized survey methodology. The sample included all members of an urban academic medical center's resuscitation response team. The study findings reveal that, overall, code team members feel that family members should be allowed to remain at the bedside during CPR but that challenges exist including education deficits and mixed feelings that may result from family presence; the study participants caring for neonates and children were more favorable to family presence during CPR than their adult counterparts. Barriers remain related to family presence during resuscitation. Education is needed for all members of the health care team to facilitate collaborative changes in resuscitation practices. Education should include information regarding institutional policies, methods for incorporating family members into the code process, and interventions to support the psychosocial needs of family members.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Family , Patient Care Team , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/psychology , Family/psychology , Humans , Organizational Policy , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 18(3): E45-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24867123

ABSTRACT

One in four women who are diagnosed with breast cancer die annually, and the single most important way to prevent this is early detection; therefore, women older than 40 years should have an annual screening mammography. Many barriers have been reported that prevent compliance with this recommendation, including lack of insurance, fear, anxiety, pain, worry, and mistrust of the medical community. Nurses are in a position to use creative interventions, such as music therapy, to help minimize barriers. Although this study did not show that music therapy during screening mammograms decreased the amount of pain that the participants experienced, it did suggest that music therapy has the potential to decrease the amount of anxiety. Assisting patients in decreasing anxiety reduces barriers for screening mammography. The literature does suggest that music is a distraction for many populations of patients; however, when patients are faced with the possible diagnosis of breast cancer, it may be difficult to find an intervention to distract a woman's mind, which was supported by the findings of this study.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Mammography/psychology , Music , Pain/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...