ABSTRACT
This study examined the relationships between a set of real-world performance measures and a set of executive function measures with a sample of community based individuals with schizophrenia (N=80). Participants were given a battery of cognitive tests and were evaluated with a real-world performance measure, the Test of Grocery Shopping Skills (TOGSS). Using canonical correlation analysis, executive functions of planning, problem solving, working memory, and task persistence were significantly related to grocery shopping efficiency and accuracy. Two canonical variates with moderate correlations (0.547 and 0.519) explain that 30% of the variance in the executive function and grocery shopping measures was shared. These results identify patterns of association between executive function performance and the independent living skill of grocery shopping indicating the Test of Grocery Shopping Skills may be considered a sensitive measure of executive function performance in a real-world setting.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Environment , Executive Function/physiology , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Attention/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Problem Solving/physiology , Statistics as Topic , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine occupational therapy practitioners' and stakeholders' opinions, perceptions, and attitudes towards communicating evidence in patient documentation. Moreover, it sought to establish relationships between factors that affect the use of evidence in documentation. METHODS: A mixed method design was used and two distinct surveys were created by the researchers in order to collect the data. In the first survey, occupational therapy practitioners in the Midwestern region of the USA completed an electronic survey. The second, a Delphi survey, was sent to other stakeholders such as case managers, rehabilitation supervisors, and payers. RESULTS: There were 126 surveys returned and analysed (29% response rate). Data revealed that 63.5% of practitioners believed in communicating evidence in documentation. Clinicians of all education levels agree that practitioners should communicate the evidence when funding is at stake (χ(2) (6, N = 110) = 15.97, P = 0.014). Participants also agreed that evidence should be communicated when dictated by their department (χ(2) (2, N = 110) = 6.25, P = 0.012).
