Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 16(6): 557-564, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28686773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is an effective treatment for nodulocystic acne. Outside of required pregnancy testing, laboratory monitoring suggested by the manufacturers is vague. Dermatologists, therefore, monitor a variety of tests with variable frequency. Despite intense monitoring, the majority of patients do not have gross laboratory abnormalities that warrant changes in management.

OBJECTIVE: To survey US dermatologists regarding laboratory monitoring practices while prescribing isotretinoin.

METHODS: An online survey sent via e-mail to members of the American Academy of Dermatology.

RESULTS: 12,396 surveys were sent with a response rate of ~19%. At baseline >60% of responders check a CBC, LFTs, and a lipid panel. 74% check a monthly lipid panel and LFTs, while 57% check a monthly CBC. 75% report stopping isotretinoin when AST or ALT values reach 3 times normal; 89% report stopping at 4 times normal. When triglycerides reach 4 times normal, 72% stop the medication.

CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus on isotretinoin monitoring tests and frequency, though the majority of dermatologists surveyed monitor a lipid panel and LFTs.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(6):557-564.

.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatologists , Isotretinoin/therapeutic use , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Adult , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Isotretinoin/administration & dosage , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Lipids/blood , Monitoring, Physiologic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...