ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ten-segment classification provides a different approach to the evaluation of tibial plateau fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of three widely used classification systems (Schatzker, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO/OTA), and the updated three-column concept (uTCC)) with ten-segment classification in two-dimensional computed tomography (2D-CT) and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). METHOD: Ninety 2D-CT and 3D-CT scans of patients with tibial plateau fractures were included in this retrospective cohort study. The included data were independently classified by six observers of different years of seniority and were independently observed and classified again after eight weeks. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the four fracture classifications made by the six observers was analyzed using the kappa statistic. Kappa values were interpreted according to the categorical rating by Landis and Koch. RESULTS: When the inter-observer reliability was based on 2D-CT/3D-CT analysis, the mean Kappa values for the Schatzker, AO/OTA, uTCC, and ten-segment classification were 0.64/0.66, 0.56/0.59, 0.53/0.65, and 0.60/0.73, respectively. When intra-observer reliability was based on 2D-CT/3D-CT, the mean Kappa values for the Schatzker, AO/OTA, uTCC, and ten-segment classification were 0.68/0.83, 0.69/0.83, 0.74/0.85, and 0.80/0.91, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D-CT is important for the reliable diagnosis and recognition of tibial plateau fracture features compared to 2D-CT. When using 3D-CT, ten-segment classification showed high intra- and inter-observer agreement.
