[Boost in proton for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A Curie Institute experience]. / Complément de dose de protons pour les cancers du nasopharynx localement évolués : une expérience de l'institut Curie.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the treatment outcome and toxicity for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with a complementary dose with proton. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and September 2016, 17 patients have been treated for a stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the proton therapy centre of Curie Institute. Bilateral lymph node in the neck (I-V levels) received from 40 to 54Gy with photon beam. The primary tumor volume including microscopically extensions received a complementary dose with proton in order to reach the dose of 70 to 78Gy. All the patients received a concomitant chemotherapy. The end-points of the study were loco-regional control, survival, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Patients characteristics were: median age 49, 71 % male, 88% stage IVa, with a majority (82%) of T4N0M0. The median follow-up was 99 months. The 2-, 5- and 10-year actuarial locoregional free survival and overall survival were 94% and 88%, 86% and 74%, and 86% and 66%, respectively. The grade≥3 late adverse events were sphenoid bone radionecrosis (5.9%) and hearing loss (23.5%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a complementary dose with proton seems to be a good option for the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, particularly for T4N0M0.

Three-year results after radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma, using highly conformational radiotherapy techniques proton therapy and/or Tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: We report the patient outcomes of a treatment combining proton therapy and Tomotherapy in sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients treated at Curie Institute, Paris, France, between March 2010 and February 2014 for an advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base. Patients received Tomotherapy, proton therapy or both. We evaluated treatment toxicity (according to CTCAE V4), local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included, with a median follow-up of 34 months. Radiation therapy followed surgery for 77% of the patients and margins were positive in all those cases. Median dose was 73.8Gy. Local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were respectively 60%, 48% and 60%. One-sided grade 3 hearing impairment occurred in 46% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Combining high-dose proton therapy and Tomotherapy is effective and has moderate toxicity in the treatment of T4 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base.

Salivary gland-sparing helical tomotherapy for head and neck cancer: Preserved salivary function on quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy after tomotherapy.

GOALS: Prospective evaluation of salivary gland preservation, overall survival and local recurrence-free survival after head and neck cancer treated by helical tomotherapy (HT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2007 to February 2009, 30 patients with head and neck cancer were treated by HT. The salivary excretion fraction (SEF) was assessed by technetium salivary gland scintigraphy before, and 6, 12 and 18 months after HT to define salivary gland preservation rates. Patients were reviewed every 3 months to assess clinical toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.3 years. The mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland (IPG) was 25.4Gy. Good preservation of parotid gland function was observed in 84% of the 19 patients evaluated by scintigraphy at 18 months. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 100% among the 6 patients who received a dose of more than 26Gy to the parotid gland. The 28-month LRFS was 33% in the group that received a dose of less than 20Gy versus 91% in the group that received a dose of more than 20Gy to the IPG. CONCLUSIONS: Helical tomotherapy reduced the incidence and severity of xerostomia. A mean dose to the parotid between 20 and 26Gy allowed preservation of salivary function without compromising treatment efficacy. However, parotid-sparing HT requiring a mean dose less than 20Gy is associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

[Impact of dynamic IMRT and tomotherapy in pelvic cancers: a prospective dosimetric study with 51 patients]. / Apport de la RCMI rotationnelle et de la tomothérapie hélicoïdale dans les cancers pelviens : étude dosimétrique prospective sur 51 patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric results of different techniques of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients treated for a pelvic cancer with nodal irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 51 patients included prospectively in the Artpelvis study were analyzed. Thirty-six patients were treated for a high-risk prostate cancer (13 with helical tomotherapy, and 23 with Rapid'Arc(®)) and 15 patients were treated for a localized anal cancer (nine with helical tomotherapy and six with Rapid'Arc(®)). Plan quality was assessed according to several different dosimetric indexes of coverage of planning target volume and sparing of organs at risk. RESULTS: Although some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, helical tomotherapy and Rapid'Arc provided very similar and highly conformal plans. Regarding organs at risk, Rapid'Arc(®) provided better pelvic bone sparing with a lower non-tumoral integral dose. CONCLUSION: In pelvis cancer with nodal irradiation, Rapid'Arc and helical tomotherapy provided very similar plans. The clinical evaluation of Artpelvis study will verify this equivalence hypothesis.

Management of advanced non-melanoma skin cancers using helical tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Helical tomotherapy (HT) is a relatively new method of radiotherapy, the main advantages of which are an increase of irradiation dose on the target tumour volume and best protection of adjacent organs at risk. OBJECTIVE: To provide an accurate evaluation of efficiency and tolerance of HT on different kinds of non-melanoma skin tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed, retrospectively, 25 patients (pts) who were treated with HT for advanced non-melanoma skin cancers. We studied the characteristics of patients and tumours, associated treatments, characteristics, efficacy and tolerance of HT treatment. RESULTS: Eight had basal cell carcinoma, Eight had cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, five Merkel cell carcinoma and four adnexal carcinoma. The median age was 75 years (range 51-89). The median follow-up was 12 months. HT was used because of incomplete excision (n = 12), lymph node involvement (n = 6), non-operable lesions (n = 4) and high risk of relapse (n = 4). The delivered dose for the tumour bed was between 50 and 70 Gy and for the lymph node it was between 50 and 64 Gy. There was no grade III-IV adverse event, except one grade III mucositis. Fourteen pts suffered from limited toxic effects 6 months after the end of the treatment, mainly loss of eyebrow and teared eye. Complete remission was noticed for 22 pts (88%); one pt had progressive disease and two pts died. CONCLUSION: HT is an effective option for advanced non-melanoma skin cancers as radical treatment or in association with surgery. Early and late toxicity and cosmetic results are acceptable.

[Helical tomotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: The impact of low doses on pulmonary and oesophageal toxicity]. / Tomothérapie hélicoïdale dans le traitement du mésothéliome pleural malin : impact des faibles doses sur la toxicité pulmonaire et œsophagienne.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma by helical tomotherapy and the impact of low doses on esophageal and pulmonary toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2007 and May 2011, 29 patients diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma received adjuvant radiotherapy by helical tomotherapy. The median age was 63 years (34-72). Histologically, 83 % of patients had epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clinically, 45 % of patients were T3 and 55 % N0. Eighty six percent of the patients were treated by extrapleural pneumonectomy and 35 % received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum and pemetrexed. The median dose in the pneumonectomy cavity was 50Gy at 2Gy/fraction. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 2.3 years after diagnosis. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 65 and 36 % respectively. The median survival from diagnosis was 18 months. Median lung volumes receiving 2, 5, 10, 13, 15 and 20Gy (V2, V5, V10, V13, V15 and V20) were 100, 98, 52, 36, 19 and 5 %. The median of the mean remaining lung dose was 11Gy. Two patients died of pulmonary complications, three patients had grade 3 lung toxicity, while esophageal grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in three other patients. No significant impact of clinical characteristics and dosimetric parameters were found on pulmonary toxicity, however a V10≥50 %, a V15≥15 % and mean lung dose of 10Gy or more had a tendency to be predictive of pulmonary toxicity (P<0.1). Moreover, in our analysis, the mean lung dose seems to have a significant impact on esophageal toxicity (P=0.03) as well as low doses to the controlateral lung: V5, V10 and V13 (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Helical tomotherapy is a promising technique in the multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Low doses received by the contralateral lung appear to be the limiting factor. A dosimetric comparison with volumetric modulated arctherapy techniques would be interesting in this setting.

[Localized Ewing sarcoma of the spine: a preliminary dose-escalation study comparing innovative radiation techniques in a single patient]. / Sarcomes d'Ewing localisés du rachis chez l'enfant : étude préliminaire d'escalade de dose comparant les techniques innovantes.

PURPOSE: Although radiosensitive, spinal locations of Ewing's sarcomas are challenging for the radiation oncologist due to poor radiation tolerance of the spinal cord. However, some favorable anatomical compartments - that may represent more than 20% - were associated with a better outcome and could benefit from a radiation dose escalation using the most recent radiation therapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a dose escalation study on one patient, declined in two scenarios: (1) a tumour located within a single vertebral body and (2) a locally advanced disease involving the vertebral foramen and paraspinal soft tissues. Five dose-levels are proposed: 44.8Gy, 54.4Gy, 59.2Gy, 65.6Gy and 70.4Gy (1.6Gy per session, 8Gy per week). The 3D-conformational technique is compared with static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic body robotic radiation therapy (SBRT) and protontherapy (passive scattering). Two constraints had to be respected in order to skip to the next level: the planned target volume (PTV) coverage must exceed 95% and the D(2%) on the spinal cord shall not exceed a given constraint set at 50Gy in case 1 and 44Gy in case 2 due to initial neurological sufferance. RESULTS: Only protontherapy, SBRT, helical tomotherapy and VMAT appear able to reach the last dose level while respecting the constraints in case 1. On the other hand, only helical tomotherapy seems capable of reaching 59.2Gy on the PTV in case 2. CONCLUSION: With the most recent radiation therapy techniques, it becomes possible to deliver up to 70.4Gy in a favorable compartment in this sham patient. Unfavorable compartments can receive up to 59.2Gy. Definitive radiation therapy may be an interesting local treatment option to be validated in an early phase trial.

New strategy in hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: tomotherapy and capecitabine followed by hepatic surgical resection.

The majority of patients who develop liver metastases in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has often unresectable disease. Several new methods of nonsurgical ablation have been tested with variable success. Helical tomotherapy (HT), such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy therapy, is a recent radiation therapy technique which can provide simultaneous and precise targeting of multiple lesions, while sparing normal tissues. We retrospectively assess the feasibility and the tolerance of IMRT with capecitabine followed by hepatic surgery in mCRC patients. This original observation suggests that HT could be safely integrated in the multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as an alternative to surgery or other local ablation therapies.

Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the potential benefit of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) compared to free breathing (FB) radiotherapy in a homogeneous population of patients with lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 25 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by DIBH underwent an additional FB CT scan. The DIBH and FB treatment plans were compared. Target volume was compared using coverage, homogeneity, and conformal indices. Organs at risk were compared using V(5), V(13), V(20), V(25), V(37), mean dose (D(mean)) for lungs, V(40) and D(mean) for the heart, V(50), D(mean) and maximum dose (D(max)) for the esophagus, and using biological indices, i.e., the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: Median age was 62 years. Prescribed total dose was 66 Gy. Conformity index was improved with DIBH (0.67 vs. 0.58, p = 0.046) but coverage and homogeneity indices were not significantly different. Lung dosimetric parameters were improved using DIBH: D(mean) (13 vs. 15 Gy, p = 10(-4)), V(5) (43 vs. 51%, p = 6.10(-5)), V(13) (31 vs. 38%, p = 2.10(-3)), V(20) (25 vs. 31%, p = 0.01), V(25) (22% vs. 27%, p = 0.01) and V(37) (12 vs. 16%, p = 0.03), EUD (8.2 vs. 9.9 Gy, p = 3.10(-4)), and NTCP (1.9 vs. 4.8%, p = 10(-3)). For the heart, D(mean) (14 vs. 17 Gy, p = 0.003), V(40) (12 vs. 17%, p = 0.004), and EUD (19 vs. 22 Gy, p = 6.10(-4)) were reduced with DIBH, whereas V(30) and NTCP were similar. DIBH improved the D(mean) (28 vs. 30 Gy, p = 0.007) and V(50) (25 vs. 30%, p = 0.003) for the esophagus, while EUD, NTCP, and D(max) were not altered. CONCLUSION: DIBH improves the target conformity index and heart and lung dosimetry in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The clinical implications of these findings should be confirmed.

[Value of tomotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: first clinical results]. / Intérêt de la tomothérapie après pleuro-pneumonectomie extrapleurale dans le mésothéliome pleural malin: premiers résultats cliniques.

INTRODUCTION: There is little clinical data about the place of helicoidal tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This new form of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has great theoretical advantages in large and complex volumes when compared to "traditional" forms of radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients diagnosed with MPM received adjuvant radiotherapy by HT. The patients were treated at the Curie Institute and the René Gauducheau Centre, starting in August 12007. All patients had a complete initial staging, an extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), and a minimum follow-up of six months. The median dose prescribed to the surgical cavity was 50 Gy (48-54 Gy) in 2 Gy (1.80-2.07) fractions. High dose regions received concomitant 57 Gy (54-69 Gy) in 2.16 Gy (2.00-2.30 Gy) fractions. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12.6 months after ending HT. Seven patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin, and pemetrexed). Eight patients were staged pT3 and five were staged pN1-2. HT was well tolerated. Two patients had suspected G5 radiation pneumonitis within 6 months of ending HT. Of the 12 patients who survived treatment, six relapsed (in average 5.1 months after HT): distant. Four relapses were distant; two relapses were both local and distant. Three patients died after their initial relapse. After initial diagnosis, the median survival was 18.4 months. A learning curve was observed in the optimization of the dosimetric parameters. CONCLUSION: Helicoidal tomotherapy is a reliable, quite well tolerated, and efficient way of treating MPM patients after an EPP.

[Helical tomotherapy: description and clinical applications]. / Tomothérapie hélicoïdale : aspects techniques et applications cliniques.

Helical tomotherapy is an innovative device combining with the same linac on board-imaging and IMRT facilities. The first national French evaluations, supported by National Institut of Cancer (INCa) are presented. Dosimetric characteristics as quality of homogeneity, cut-off outside target volumes allow IMRT treatments for large and complex volumes and a good organ at risk sparing. First comparative dosimetric studies are discussed.

Technique alternatives for breast radiation oncology: Conventional radiation therapy to tomotherapy.

Breast conserving radiotherapy uses tangential fields and compensating wedges. This conventional approach can be improved by a field-in-field technique using the linac multi-leaf collimator (MLC). A simplified field-in-field technique that planners can easily achieve and which improves dose uniformity in the breast volume is presented here. Field junction problems are more easily solved by the use of a virtual simulation. A unique isocenter can be set at the junction between the supra-clavicular field and the breast tangential fields. However, careful quality assurance of the treatment planning system must be performed. Tomotherapy has promising clinical advantages: the ability of a tomographic image to correct for random set-up errors, a continuous cranio-caudal delivery which suppresses junction problems, the conformality of the dose distribution throughout the complex volumes formed by the lymph nodes and the breasts. Tomotherapy is a valuable recourse for complex irradiations like bilateral breast or mammary plus axillary irradiation while a field-in-field associated with a unique isocenter technique can be used for majority of the patients.

[French national evaluation for helicoidal tomotherapy: description of indications, dose constraints and set-up margins]. / Evaluation nationale de la tomothérapie hélicoïdale: description des indications, des contraintes de dose et des seuils de repositionnement.

After a request for proposal initiated by National Institute against cancer (INCa) in 2005, three French centers in France started tomotherapy in the first semester of 2007. A national policy of evaluation was performed to study the feasibility of this innovative technique and to compare the interest of helicoidal tomotherapy with other modalities of conformal therapy. Common protocols have been designed to facilitate this evaluation. Description of dose, IMRT levels and constraints are achieved according to each selected indication as: sarcoma, head and neck tumors, lung cancer, mesothelioma, bone metastases, anal carcinoma and craniospinal irradiation.

The sliding slit test for dynamic IMRT: a useful tool for adjustment of MLC related parameters.

For treatments with dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the adjustment of multileaf collimator (MLC) parameters affecting both the optimization algorithm and dose distributions is crucial. The main parameters characterizing the MLC are the transmission (T) and the dosimetric leaf separation (DLS). The aim of this study is twofold: a methodology based on the 'sliding slit' test is proposed to determine (T, DLS) combinations inducing the best conformity between calculations and measurements. Secondly, the effects of the MLC adjustment on measured dose and on optimization are presented for different configurations as the chair test and for the patient dosimetric quality control (DQC). Tests were performed with a Varian 23EX linac operated at 20 MV and equipped with a 120 leaf Millenium dynamic collimator. The treatment planning system was CadPlan/Helios (version 6.3.6). Results demonstrated that the sliding width (SW) strongly depends on the (T, DLS) combinations, and the measured dose is a linear function of the SW. Different (T, DLS) combinations induced a good agreement between calculations and measurements. The influence of the MLC calibration was found to be particularly important on the 'sliding slit' test (11.8% for a gap change of 0.8 mm) but not so much on the chair test and on the DQC. To detect small variations in leaf adjustment and to ensure consistency between calculation and actual dose delivered to patients, a daily check called IMRT MU check is proposed.

[Constraints and dosage for prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy]. / Choix des contraintes et amélioration dosimétrique d'une radiothérapie conformationnelle du cancer de la prostate modulée en intensité pendant une partie du traitement.

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is based on a methodology called inverse planning. Starting from dosimetric objectives, constraints of optimization are fixed and given to the inverse planning system, which in turn calculates the modulated intensity to apply to each beam. Since the algorithms allow the constraints to be violated, the results of optimization may differ from the initial dosimetric objectives. Consequently, the user is compelled to adapt the choice of the constraints according to the type of modulation and until satisfactory results are found. The purpose of this work is to present our experience in the choice of these constraints for prostate cancer treatments, as we moved from conformal radiotherapy to IMRT. Treatments were performed with a Varian 23EX linac and calculations were realized with the Varian CadPlan-Helios planning system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The approach used for the first 12 patients treated at institut Curie with IMRT from June 2002 was analysed. The treatment always consisted of a combination of conformal radiotherapy with and without intensity modulation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Results showed that, a larger fraction of the treatment performed with IMRT induced a better sparing of the organs at risk for the same homogeneous dose distribution to the target volume. Apart from the dose-volume constraint for the rectum, a fixed set of constraints, slightly more restrictive than the dosimetric objectives, could be used for all patients. Compared with conformal radiotherapy, the conformation factor for IMRT increased up to 16%. A specific study was undertaken in view of treatments completely performed with IMRT. The optimal technique consisted in performing separated IMRT plans for the two target volumes, the prostate volume and the prostate plus seminal vesicles volume respectively. Another satisfactory possibility was to define new constraints on two separated planning target volumes, prostate and seminal vesicles. This last approach is now routinely implemented for our IMRT patients.

[Recommendations for a head and neck IMRT quality assurance protocol]. / Recommandations pour un protocole d'assurance de qualité de la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité des cancers de la tête et du cou.

Head and neck tumors represent very interesting targets for IMRT techniques because of the complex shape of the structures and the organs at risk close by. The use of this kind of techniques requires a quality assurance protocol. The physicists of the GORTEC group shared their experience to define some recommendations in order to draw up a QA protocol. The dosimetric verification of the treatment plans (in terms of absolute and relative dose), the control of the reproducibility of the patient positioning and the use of a record and verify system to control the different parameters form the main parts of these recommendations. Each chapter comprises a description of the different methods, recommendations concerning the equipment, the adopted tolerances, the frequency of controls. At the end of each chapter, a table summarizes the main actions to carry out. These recommendations will allow to harmonize our practices whatever the softwares and the accelerator that are being used. They will simplify the task of the teams that wish to implement IMRT for head and neck tumors.

[Upper aerodigestive tract cancers: clinical benefits of conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulation]. / Cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures: bénéfices cliniques de la radiothérapie conformationnelle et de la modulation d'intensité.

The conformal radiotherapy approach, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), is based on modern imaging modalities, efficient 3D treatment planning systems, sophisticated immobilization systems and rigorous quality assurance and treatment verification. The central objective of conformal radiotherapy is to ensure a high dose distribution tailored to the limits of the target volume while reducing exposure of normal tissues. These techniques would then allow further tumor dose escalation. Head-and-neck tumors are some of the most attractive localizations to test conformal radiotherapy. They combine ballistic difficulties due to particularly complex shapes (nasopharynx, ethmoid) and problems due to the number and low tolerance of neighbouring organs like parotids, eyes, brainstem and spinal cord. The therapeutic irradiation of head-and-neck tumors thus remains a challenge for the radiation oncologist. Conformal radiotherapy does have a significant potential for improving local control and reducing toxicity when compared to standard radiotherapy. However, in the absence of prospective randomized trials, it is somewhat difficult at present to evaluate the real benefits drawn from 3DCRT and IMRT. The published clinical reports on the use of conformal radiotherapy are essentially dealing with dosimetric comparisons on relatively small numbers of patients. Recently, a few publications have emphasized the clinical experience of several precursor teams with a suitable follow-up. This paper describes the current state-of-the-art of 3DCRT and IMRT in order to evaluate the impact of these techniques on head-and-neck cancers irradiation.

Dose calculation and verification of intensity modulation generated by dynamic multileaf collimators.

While the development of inverse planning tools for optimizing dose distributions has come to a level of maturity, intensity modulation has not yet been widely implemented in clinical use because of problems related to its practical delivery and a lack of verification tools and quality assurance (QA) procedures. One of the prerequisites is a dose calculation algorithm that achieves good accuracy. The purpose of this work was twofold. A primary-scatter separation dose model has been extended to account for intensity modulation generated by a dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC). Then the calculation procedures have been tested by comparison with carefully carried out experiments. Intensity modulation is being accounted for by means of a 2D (two-dimensional) matrix of correction factors that modifies the spatial fluence distribution, incident to the patient. The dose calculation for the corresponding open field is then affected by those correction factors. They are used in order to weight separately the primary and the scatter component of the dose at a given point. In order to verify that the calculated dose distributions are in good agreement with measurements on our machine, we have designed a set of test intensity distributions and performed measurements with 6 and 20 MV photons on a Varian Clinac 2300C/D linear accelerator equipped with a 40 leaf pair dynamic MLC. Comparison between calculated and measured dose distributions for a number of representative cases shows, in general, good agreement (within 3% of the normalization in low dose gradient regions and within 3 mm distance-to-dose in high dose gradient regions). For absolute dose calculations (monitor unit calculations), comparison between calculation and measurement reveals good agreement (within 2%) for all tested cases (with the condition that the prescription point is not located on a high dose gradient region).

A method to check the accuracy of dose computation using quality index: application to scatter contribution in high energy photon beams.

Computerized dose calculation verification is a relevant component of radiotherapy treatment planning quality assurance. The usual procedure is to compare measurements to computations for several standard situations. As cases become more complex, special test phantoms and beam arrangements must be used, and an experimental procedure must be carefully established. In this paper we follow a new methodology to prepare a set of reference data that may be used to verify the accuracy of dose calculations involving changes in the scatter component of photon beams. The advantage of this methodology is that local measurements are not required. A quantitative evaluation of dose modifications was performed by means of correction factors (CF). For this purpose, three geometrical configurations were designed (asymmetric, symmetric, and reference) where the primary component was kept constant and the scatter component was varied by changing the height (h) of lateral columns. Measurements were performed in polystyrene phantoms for seven photon beam energies. CF were derived as the ratio of the absolute dose measured at the point of interest to the absolute dose for the reference configuration, for the asymmetric and symmetric configurations, respectively. They were expressed as a function of beam quality (QI). We have verified that, for all configurations studied, CF decrease with QI. For h = 15 cm, CF remain practically constant, whatever machine technology is used [the mean values of CF for the asymmetric and symmetric cases are CFa= 1.028 (0.2% 1 s.d.) and CFs= 1.058 (0.4% 1 s.d.)]. We have developed a test protocol and we have chosen those configurations corresponding to h = 15 cm because they both present greater values of the CF and lower standard deviations. The direct application of the method is straightforward. The user can reproduce on his local TPS the three experimental configurations described in the test protocol, and then compute CF which can be compared to our reference data set for any beam quality.