How Dominant Hand and Foot Dexterity May Reveal Dementia Onset: A Motor and Cognitive Dual-Task Study.

The combined provision of an arising number of dementia cases, and the substantial absence of effective treatments, led the scientific community toward the identification of early phases of this condition. Such an effort aims at the recognition of therapeutic windows and the characterization of the disease's different grades. In the last years, Motor and Cognitive Dual-Tasks (MCDT) have been widely used to address the early diagnosis of several neurocognitive disorders, among which dementia. Here we present different protocols: the walking MCDT, the toe-tapping MCDT, and the forefinger-tapping MCDT. Moreover, each task has been performed under different cognitive conditions: no cognitive effort, counting backwards by 1, 3, and 7. In this work, we report the results obtained through the combination of different motor and cognitive tasks, and we present 2 brand-new MCDT protocols, attempting to identify a sweet-spot for early diagnosis of dementia.

Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group.

BACKGROUND: Apathy is a very common behavioural and psychological symptom across brain disorders. In the last decade, there have been considerable advances in research on apathy and motivation. It is thus important to revise the apathy diagnostic criteria published in 2009. The main objectives were to: a) revise the definition of apathy; b) update the list of apathy dimensions; c) operationalise the diagnostic criteria; and d) suggest appropriate assessment tools including new technologies. METHODS: The expert panel (N = 23) included researchers and health care professionals working on brain disorders and apathy, a representative of a regulatory body, and a representative of the pharmaceutical industry. The revised diagnostic criteria for apathy were developed in a two-step process. First, following the standard Delphi methodology, the experts were asked to answer questions via web-survey in two rounds. Second, all the collected information was discussed on the occasion of the 26th European Congress of Psychiatry held in Nice (France). RESULTS: Apathy was defined as a quantitative reduction of goal-directed activity in comparison to the patient's previous level of functioning (criterion A). Symptoms must persist for at least four weeks, and affect at least two of the three apathy dimensions (behaviour/cognition; emotion; social interaction; criterion B). Apathy should cause identifiable functional impairments (criterion C), and should not be fully explained by other factors, such as effects of a substance or major changes in the patient's environment (Criterion D). CONCLUSIONS: The new diagnostic criteria for apathy provide a clinical and scientific framework to increase the validity of apathy as a clinical construct. This should also help to pave the path for apathy in brain disorders to be an interventional target.