ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Postoperative complications after breast cancer surgery may be associated with decreased quality of life. It remains unclear whether oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy with reconstruction lead to more postoperative complications than conventional breast surgery (CBS). As delayed wound healing (DWH) is one of the most frequent minor complications, we sought to investigate the significance of DWH for patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic, reconstructive, and CBS. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with stage I-II breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic or CBS performed by three breast surgeons at a single tertiary referral hospital from June 2011 until May 2019. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated postoperatively using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Comparisons were made between patients with and without DWH. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients who met the inclusion criteria and 28 (12%) of them developed DWH, 27/158 (17%) in the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and reconstruction group and 1/71 (1%) in the CBS group. The mean time from surgery to BREAST-Q assessment was comparable in both groups (29 months in the DWH vs. 33 months in the normal wound healing group). No statistically significant difference for any BREAST-Q scale was detected between patients with and without DWH. This includes physical (p = 0.183), psychosocial (p = 0.489), sexual well-being (p = 0.895), and satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.068). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy with reconstruction lead to significantly more DWH than CBS. However, neither quality of life nor patient-reported outcomes following state-of-the-art reconstructive or oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery at a specialized center seem to be compromised.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , Mastectomy, Segmental/adverse effects , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Wound HealingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after different types of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) procedures and correlate the results with previously published normative data from women with no prior history of breast cancer (BC) and breast surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients with stage I-II BC undergoing a specific selection of OPS procedures from 04/2012 to 12/2018 by three breast surgeons at a single tertiary referral hospital in Switzerland. PROs were evaluated using the postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and were surveyed. All OPS techniques achieved comparably elevated scores in satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. Compared to normative data of healthy women, all OPS groups postoperatively achieved significantly better satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. CONCLUSION: This study shows high PROs across all types of OPS, which were superior to normative data from healthy women. Our findings confirm that OPS is associated with high quality of life and patient satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lateral excess tissue after mastectomy is a frequent problem, which should be included into preoperative planning. Women with lateral tissue abundance are frequently impaired cosmetically and functionally. We suggest a novel oncoplastic mastectomy technique to eliminate the above mentioned. METHODS: Surgical technique Two small horizontal lines are drawn, one line above and one line below the Nipple Areola Complex. These lines should represent the possible skin excision and allow tight skin closure. Consecutively, two ending points of the incision are planned, one close to the xyphoid area and the other one in the anterior axillary line. These points are then interconnected in an s-shaped manner to form a double s-shaped skin excision. RESULTS: The double S-shaped technique is an easy reproducible technique which not only allows good access to the lateral side of the mastectomy, but also and mainly the reduction of lateral fat and skin. CONCLUSION: The double S mastectomy allows for simultaneous removal of access in the axillary region, eliminating skin, and fat as needed and preventing the lateral dog ear.
