ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ultimate goal of the treatment of infectious knee arthritis is to protect the articular cartilage from adverse effects of infection. Treatment, however, is not always hundred percent successful and has a 12% failure rate. Persistent infection is more likely to happen in elderly patients and those with underlying joint diseases, particularly osteoarthritis. Eradication of infection and restoration of function in the involved joint usually are not possible by conventional treatment strategies. There are few case series reporting two-stage primary knee arthroplasty as the salvage treatment of the septic degenerative knee joint; however, the treatment protocol remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Based on a proposed approach, patients with failure of common interventions for treatment of septic knee arthritis and underlying joint degeneration were treated by two-stage TKA and intervening antibiotic loaded static cement spacer. Suppressive antibiotic therapy was not prescribed after the second stage. RESULTS: Complete infection eradication was achieved with mean follow up of 26 months. All cases were balanced with primary total knee prosthesis. The knee scores and final range of motions were comparable to other studies. CONCLUSION: The two-stage total knee replacement technique is a good option for management of failure of previous surgical treatment in patients with septic arthritis and concomitant joint degeneration. Our proposed approach enabled us to use primary prosthesis in all of our patients with no need for suppressive antibiotic therapy.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Methodological study. PURPOSE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce a new modified method for inserting iliosacral screws and to compare its results with those of a conventional method. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Previous techniques, such as open reduction and internal fixation, are associated with perioperative hemorrhage, postoperative infection, and neurological deficits. Although percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion confers the advantage of being minimally invasive, leading to less blood loss and a low postoperative infection rate, it harbors the risk of screw malpositioning due to narrow sacral proportions and a high interindividual variability. METHODS: Nine cadaveric pelvises were included in this study, with one hemipelvis of each being assigned to the new modified method and the other to the conventional iliosacral screw insertion method. In the new modified method, the guidewire entry point was determined using a lateral sacral X-ray. To do so, we first identified the anterosuperior quadrant of the S1 body on one hemipelvis. The anterosuperior quadrant was further divided into four imaginary quadrants, and the guidewire was inserted into the posteroinferior quadrant. The guidewire trajectory was perpendicular to the sagittal plane so that the guidewire resembled a single point in the lateral sacral view. Guidewires were inserted into corresponding hemipelves using the conventional method as described in the literature. Subsequently, an axial computed tomography scan with 1-mm fine cuts was obtained, and sagittal and coronal views were reconstructed. The distance of the guidewire from the sacral canal, anterior sacral cortex, and first sacral foramen was measured in axial, sagittal, and coronal views. The minimum measurement among different views was defined as the safety index of the insertion methods. The conventional and new modified methods were then compared in terms of safety and duration of the procedure. RESULTS: The minimum distance of the guidewire from the S1 foramen and anterior sacral cortex was not significantly different between the two methods. However, the minimum distance between the guidewire and sacral canal was significantly greater in the new modified method than in the conventional method. The duration of guidewire insertion was significantly shorter in the new modified method than in the conventional method. CONCLUSIONS: This new modified method of iliosacral screw insertion could be safely and simply implemented while taking less surgical time than the conventional methods.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In younger adults with fractures of the femoral neck, anatomic reduction is compulsory and maintaining the reduction is crucial. Both cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw (DHS) have the capacity of compression in the fracture site but the strength for keeping reduction is not the same. The aim of this study was to compare the results with fixations of the femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw. METHODS: This is a randomized clinical trial study on 58 cases with a minimum of one year follow-up. Leg length discrepancy, Harris Hip Score, infection, avascular necrosis of femoral head, and union of the fracture site were evaluated. RESULTS: There were two failures in the first trimester in the cannulated screw group and three more failures in the second and third trimesters in this group. In the DHS group, there was no reduction and fixation failure in the follow-up period. There was no fixation failure (0 %) in Group B (DHS) but there were five fixation failures (18 %) in Group A (screw), and there is significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The rate of avascular necrosis was the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems to us that in our practice the fixation of femoral neck fracture in young adults with the DHS is a better option compared with the osteosynthsis with multiple cannulated screws.
