The potential association between psychiatric symptoms and the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs): A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Levonorgestrel (LNG)-intrauterine devices (IUDs) are an effective method of contraception; however, there is growing evidence regarding potential psychiatric side effects such as depressive symptoms, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to summarise the psychiatric effects of using LNG-IUDs. METHODS: We searched six databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo), and we included all study designs. The included studies were extracted, quality assessed, and qualitatively summarised. RESULTS: Out of the screened studies, only 22 were finally included. While ten studies showed increased depressive symptoms, two studies showed reduced symptoms. Moreover, one study showed increased anxiety, another one reported an increased risk of suicide, four studies concluded no association with depressive symptoms, and four other studies showed uncertainty about a potential association but mentioned other psychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSION: Despite unreliable data, many studies report psychiatric symptoms associated with LNG-IUDs, predominantly depression. Gynaecologists, general practitioners, and psychiatrists should therefore be aware of these potential risks, especially depressive symptoms and suicidality. Counselling patients about these risks should be mandatory. Further studies should investigate the absolute risk of mental disorders associated with LNG-IUDs and other hormonal contraceptives.KEY MESSAGESMany researchers are reporting adverse psychiatric events associated with levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs).Despite their effectiveness, a proper psychiatric assessment should be done before inserting LNG-IUDs.Proper counselling regarding the depressive symptoms and suicidality should be done by the treating obstetrician.Further studies should investigate the absolute risk of mental disorders associated with LNG-IUDs and other hormonal contraceptives.

Drug-Associated Liver Injury Related to Antipsychotics: Exploratory Analysis of Pharmacovigilance Data.

BACKGROUND: Drug-associated liver injury is one of the most common causes for acute liver failure and market withdrawal of approved drugs. In addition, the potential for hepatotoxicity related to specific substances has to be considered in psychopharmacotherapy. However, systematic evaluations of hepatotoxicity related to antipsychotics are limited. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory case/non-case study and evaluated pharmacovigilance data from VigiBase related to 30 antipsychotics marketed in the European Union. Reporting odds ratios were calculated for antipsychotics associated with the Standardized Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities queries "Drug-related hepatic disorders-comprehensive search" (DRHD-CS) and "Drug-related hepatic disorders-severe events only" (DRHD-SEO). RESULTS: We found several signals for drug-associated liver injury including signals for severe events: 17 of 30 antipsychotics were associated with DRHD-CS and 10 of 30 antipsychotics with DRHD-SEO. Amisulpride, fluphenazine, levomepromazine, loxapine, olanzapine, perazine, perphenazine, pipamperone, sulpiride, and thioridazine were associated with both, DRHD-CS and DRHD-SEO. No association with fatal outcomes was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Several common antipsychotics are associated with hepatotoxicity, partly also with severe hepatotoxicity. Our data do not allow to account for patient-related risk factors for drug-associated liver injury. This should be addressed in further studies.

Harmonization of summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) of drugs with the same active ingredients: an evaluation of SmPCs of the most frequently prescribed active substances.

PURPOSE: In aut-idem or generic substitution, discrepancies between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) referring to the same active substance (AS) may cause difficulties regarding informed consent and medical liability. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of such discrepancies are insufficiently studied, impeding harmonization of same-substance SmPCs and compromising safe drug treatment. METHODS: SmPCs of the one hundred most frequently prescribed ASs in Germany were analyzed for discrepancies in the presentation of indications (Inds) and contraindications (CInds). Inclusion and exclusion criteria of drugs/SmPCs were chosen according to the standards of the aut-idem substitution in Germany. RESULTS: According to the study protocol, we identified 1486 drugs, of which 1426 SmPCs could be obtained. 41% respectively 65% of the ASs had same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC in the number of listed Inds respectively CInds. The number of listed Inds/CInds varied considerably between same-substance SmPCs with maximum ranges in Inds of 7 in amoxicillin, and in CInds of 11 in lisinopril. Many ASs had large proportions (> 50%) of associated same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC. A considerable proportion of ASs had same-substance SmPCs with formal and content-related differences other than the discrepancy in the number of Inds/CInds. CONCLUSION: This evaluation of same-substance SmPCs shows a clear lack of harmonization of same-substance SmPCs. Considering that generic substitution has become the rule and that physicians usually do not know which drug the patient receives in the pharmacy, these discrepancies raise several questions, that require a separate legal evaluation.

Risk of Bleeding Associated With Antidepressants: Impact of Causality Assessment and Competition Bias on Signal Detection.

Introduction: Until now, methods of pharmacovigilance as disproportionality analysis were not capable of proving the otherwise well-established increased bleeding risk related to antidepressants (ADs). As bleeding events with ADs often occur in combination with antithrombotics, they might not be considered causative of, but merely "linked" with, the bleeding event. Therefore, we hypothesized that the causality assessment of bleeding events in association with ADs and the competitive impact of antithrombotics are factors contributing to the non-findings of previous pharmacovigilance studies. Methods: We performed a case/non-case study based on data from VigiBaseTM and calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) for 25 ADs. We used individual case safety reports (ICSRs) that were differently categorized in the database regarding their type of association between drug and event. Furthermore, we investigated the competitive impact of antithrombotics by comparing RORs with and without ICSRs related to antithrombotics. Results: Analysis of ICSRs that were categorized as causally associated resulted in the detection of only two signals (citalopram and escitalopram; upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Analysis of ICSRs irrespective of the type of association resulted in the detection of signals in 8 out of 25 ADs (regarding bleeding, in general, gastrointestinal bleeding and upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Consideration of ICSRs associated with antithrombotics as competitive substances did not have a major impact on signal detection in our analysis. Conclusion: Categorization of the type of association between drug and event affects the results of quantitative signal detection. Causality assessment seems to play a major role in signal detection, probably particularly concerning rare, unknown, or clinically insignificant adverse drug reactions. ADs appear to significantly increase the bleeding risk, even independent of antithrombotic comedication.

Rediscovering Psilocybin as an Antidepressive Treatment Strategy.

There has recently been a renewal of interest in psychedelic research on the use of psilocybin in psychiatric treatment and, in particular, for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Several state-of-the-art studies have provided new insight into the mechanisms of action of psilocybin and its therapeutic potential. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered. With this review, we provide an overview of the current state of research on the potential mechanisms of psilocybin, its antidepressant potential, and the associated risks and adverse effects, to provide an update on a controversial topic discussed in psychopharmacology. A database search was conducted in Medline including articles on psilocybin over the period of the last 20 years. Despite the promising progress in understanding the mechanisms of psilocybin, the exact antidepressive mechanism and the role of the psychedelic experience remain elusive. The studies included in this review found high treatment effect sizes for psilocybin as an antidepressant. However, the results must be regarded as preliminary due to several limitations. Although the current studies observed no severe adverse events, several questions regarding safety and utility remain and must be subject of future research.

The Impact of Serotonin Transporter Binding Affinity on the Risk of Bleeding Related to Antidepressants.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The alleged primary mechanism underlying bleeding events associated with antidepressants is inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets resulting in reduced platelet aggregability and activity, and prolonged bleeding time. There is some evidence that a substance's degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition in terms of its binding affinity to the serotonin transporter (SERT) affects the magnitude of bleeding risk increase. METHODS/PROCEDURE: To test this hypothesis, we performed data mining in the worldwide largest pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) and conducted pharmacodynamically informed quantitative signal detection. Reporting odds ratios related to the standardized Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities query term "haemorrhages" and 24 antidepressants were calculated, and SERT binding affinities (pKi) were obtained and correlated (Pearson correlation). FINDINGS/RESULTS: A strong and statistically significant correlation between substance-related reporting odds ratios and SERT binding affinities was found (r = 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.82; P = 0.00097). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our findings strengthen the hypothesis that inhibition of serotonin uptake contributes to the antidepressant-related bleeding risk and suggest an association between the degree of the SERT binding affinity and the bleeding risk. This supports the preferential use of antidepressants with low or no SERT binding affinity in depressed patients at risk of bleeding.

Risk of Bleeding Associated with Antidepressant Drugs: The Competitive Impact of Antithrombotics in Quantitative Signal Detection.

BACKGROUND: To date, disproportionality analysis has been unable to demonstrate the increased bleeding risk associated with antidepressant drugs, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that a potential signal for an increased bleeding risk may be mitigated by the effects of agents other than antidepressant drugs that are strongly associated with haemorrhages, especially antithrombotics. In addition, we investigated if the use of more specific search terms of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities facilitates the detection of signals. METHODS: Pharmacovigilance data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre were used to calculate substance-specific reporting odds ratios (RORs) for all types of bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding. Reporting odds ratios were calculated with and without antithrombotic comedication. RESULTS: Regarding any type of bleeding, no signals were found in association with antidepressant drugs. Concerning upper gastrointestinal bleeding, signals were found related to citalopram (ROR: 1.56 [95% confidence interval 1.11-2.20]) and escitalopram (ROR: 1.52 [95% confidence interval 1.03-2.25]). After removal of reports related to antithrombotics, these signals could no longer be detected, but a new signal related to St. John's Wort associated with haemorrhages was found (ROR: 1.50 [95% confidence interval 1.21-1.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotics seem unlikely to have a major impact on the detection of the bleeding risk of antidepressant drugs. The different categorisation of adverse drug reactions regarding the strength of a causal relationship between a drug and an event in the database may be relevant for this negative finding.

Reporting, handling, and subjective importance of adverse drug reactions among general practitioners: an exploratory cross-sectional survey.

Background: Interventions for improving reporting and management of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) need regular evaluations of attitude and knowledge of health care professionals regarding pharmacovigilance.Research design and methods: An exploratory survey among general practitioners in Germany was conducted.Results: We interviewed 302 individuals (participation rate 34.3%; mean age 54 yrs; 37.1% female). Underreporting was prevalent in the sample (only 16.6% had reported an ADR in 2015; average total number of ADR-reports was 5). We found awareness of the importance of pharmacovigilance and ADRs, information deficits (43% were not aware of the obligation to report ADRs), and several uncertainties regarding the detection and reporting of ADRs. The participants rated the German ADR reporting system as satisfactory (mean grade 3.7 ± 1.2) and criticized the expenditure of time (63.6%) and the overall complexity (47.4%). To increase the motivation to report ADRs, the majority requested the possibility to report by telephone (61.3%), feedback after reporting (49.3%), telephone consultations (47.4%), and more education and training in pharmacovigilance (31.1%), also during medical school (25.8%).Conclusions: We found evidence of objective and subjective need for further (mandatory) education and training in pharmacovigilance, already during medical school. Our results point to some shortcomings of the German pharmacovigilance system.

Corrigendum: Risk of Bleeding Associated With Antidepressants: Impact of Causality Assessment and Competition Bias on Signal Detection.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.727687.].

Depressive Disorder With Panic Attacks After Replacement of an Intrauterine Device Containing Levonorgestrel: A Case Report.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is used as hormonal contraception by millions of women worldwide. It is considered as a safe device with low rates of systemic adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, an emerging evidence suggest mood changes as ADRs. Whereas most of these studies report psychiatric ADRs after the first implantation of the LNG-IUS, it has to be considered that these may also occur after replacement, even when psychiatric symptoms were not evident at the time of the initial insertion. A potential explanation for the development of psychiatric ADRs in subsequent LNG-IUS may rely on fluctuations of sex hormones throughout the female life cycle with changing windows of vulnerabilities for developing mood disorders. Thus, the reliable contraception for women remains a continual challenge. We present the case of a 41-year-old woman that used the LNG-IUS (Mirena®) for contraception over 5 years without any complaints. Within the first weeks after insertion of the second LNG-IUS, she developed a depressive syndrome and anxieties. An extensive somatic, including gynecological examination revealed no pathological findings and a mental disorder was suggested. Due to the patient´s request and the recommendation of her psychiatrist, the device was removed and led to a remission of her mental complaints up to a 6- and 12-months follow-up. Beyond the mood changes considerably affecting her quality of life, the patient raised the concerns that she has never been informed about potential ADRs on mental health and her remarks regarding the potential association between psychiatric symptoms and the LNG-IUS were considered as groundless. With this case, we strengthen previous observations regarding mood changes under LNG-IUS. Moreover, we illustrate that psychiatric symptoms may also occur as ADRs during the subsequent insertion. Thus, we emphasize that psychiatric symptoms have to be clearly communicated as ADRs to patients with LNG-IUS within a written informed consent and should be routinely examined by gynecologists.

Intranasal Pregabalin Administration: A Review of the Literature and the Worldwide Spontaneous Reporting System of Adverse Drug Reactions.

BACKGROUND: It is repeatedly reported that pregabalin (PRG) and gabapentin feature a potential for abuse/misuse, predominantly in patients with former or active substance use disorder. The most common route of use is oral, though reports of sublingual, intravenous, rectal, and smoking administration also exist. A narrative review was performed to provide an overview of current knowledge about nasal PRG use. METHODS: A narrative review of the currently available literature of nasal PRG use was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The abstracts and articles identified were reviewed and examined for relevance. Secondly, a request regarding reports of cases of nasal PRG administration was performed in the worldwide spontaneous reporting system of adverse drug reactions of the European Medicines Agency (EMA, EudraVigilance database). RESULTS: The literature search resulted in two reported cases of nasal PRG use. In the analysis of the EMA-database, 13 reported cases of nasal PRG use (11 male (two not specified), mean age of users = 34.2 years (four not specified)) were found. In two cases fatalities occurred related to PRG nasal use. CONCLUSIONS: Even if only little evidence can be found in current literature, the potential for misuse/abuse of PRG via nasal route might be of particular importance in the near future in PRG users who misuse it. Physicians should be aware of these alternative routes of administration.

[Sleep disorders and impaired sleep as adverse drug reactions of psychotropic drugs: an evaluation of data of summaries of product characteristics]. / Schlafstörungen und Beeinträchtigungen des Schlafs als Nebenwirkungen von Psychopharmaka: eine Bewertung der Daten aus Fachinformationen.

OBJECTIVE: Psychopharmacotherapy is essential in the treatment of many mental disorders. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) have impact on compliance and tolerability. Sleep disorders or impaired sleep may occur as ADRs of psychopharmacotherapy. Sleep disorders are associated with an increased risk for physical and mental illness and may impair cognition, impulse control, emotion regulation and mood. Objective of the following study was the systematic presentation of type and risk of sleep disorders/impairments of sleep of frequently prescribed psychotropic drugs. METHODS: Psychotropic agents that are most frequently prescribed in Germany were identified by using the Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2016. Summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) of corresponding original products were analyzed regarding presence and frequency of sleep disorders/impairments of sleep according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders 3 (ICSD-3). RESULTS: N = 64 SmPCs were analyzed. In most of the analyzed SmPCs, at least one sleep disorder (50/64; 78 %) was listed. At least one SmPC with a corresponding ADR was found in the categories insomnia (52 %), parasomnias (33 %), and sleep-related movement disorders (20 %); sleep-related breathing disorders (6 %) and central disorders of hypersomnolence (5 %) were rarely listed; circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder was not found. The SmPCs of the four most frequently prescribed agents (citalopram > venlafaxine > mirtazapine > sertraline) listed insomnia as an ADR. Nearly all analysed hypnotics (except chloral hydrate) were associated with nightmares. CONCLUSION(S): Most of the psychotropic agents frequently prescribed in Germany may induce sleep disorders/impairments of sleep. The four most frequently prescribed agents were antidepressants and all of the corresponding SmPCs listed insomnia as a possible ADR. Sleep disorders should be taken seriously as possible ADRs of psychopharmacotherapy.

Sensitivity of Quantitative Signal Detection in Regards to Pharmacological Neuroenhancement.

Pharmacological neuroenhancement (PNE) is a form of abuse and has not yet been addressed by methods of pharmacovigilance. In the present study, we tested if quantitative signal detection may be sensitive in regards to PNE. We evaluated the risk of drug abuse and dependence (DAAD) related to substances that are known to be used for PNE and divided this group into agents with (methylphenidate) and without a known abuse potential outside the field of PNE (atomoxetine, modafinil, acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, and memantine). Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated using a case/non-case approach based on global and country-specific drug safety data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC). Both control substances (diazepam and lorazepam) and methylphenidate were statistically associated with DAAD in all datasets (except methylphenidate in Italy). Modafinil was associated with DAAD in the total dataset (ROR, 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-3.3)), Germany (ROR, 4.6 (95% CI, 1.8-11.5)), and the USA (ROR, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6-2.5)). Atomoxetine was associated with DAAD in the total dataset (ROR, 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5)) and in the UK (ROR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.8-6.1)). Apart from memantine, which was associated with DAAD in Germany (ROR, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.0-3.2)), no other antidementia drug was associated with DAAD. Quantitative signal detection is suitable to detect agents with a risk for DAAD. Its sensitivity regarding PNE is limited, although atomoxetine and modafinil, which do not have a known abuse potential outside PNE, and no antidementia drugs, whose use in PNE is presumably low, were associated with DAAD in our analysis.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Associated With Antidepressive Psychopharmacotherapy: An Explorative Assessment Based on Quantitative Signal Detection Using Different MedDRA Terms.

Drug-induced liver injury is a major problem of pharmacotherapy and is also frequent with antidepressive psychopharmacotherapy. However, there are only few studies using a consistent methodologic approach to study hepatotoxicity of a larger group of antidepress ants. We performed a quantitative signal detection analysis using data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre from the WHO that records adverse drug reaction (ADR) data from worldwide sources; we retrieved substance- and country-specific (Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States) ADR data and calculated reporting odds ratios as measures for disproportionality within a case/noncase approach. To allow for identification of agents that cause severe forms of hepatotoxic ADRs, we used 2 terms of the MedDRA ("drug-related hepatic disorders-comprehensive search" [DRHD-CS] and "… -severe events only" [DRHD-SEO]). Distribution of signals was heterogeneous throughout the different data sets, and consistent findings were present for only a few substances: agomelatine (AGM) and tianeptine as well as both positive control agents (amineptine, nefazodone) generated signals related to DRHD-CS and DRHD-SEO in all analyzed data sets. Tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants (here amitriptyline, clomipramine, mianserin, mirtazapine, trimipramine) were associated with hepatotoxicity in several data sets. Using 2 MedDRA terms did not allow for detection of agents that cause severe hepatotoxic ADR. Our results support the findings of previous, primarily literature-based, systematic analyses of hepatotoxicity related to antidepressive psychopharmacotherapy. No new safety information could be generated. Application of 2 MedDRA terms did not increase the substance-specific safety information.

Linking Annual Prescription Volume of Antidepressants to Corresponding Web Search Query Data: A Possible Proxy for Medical Prescription Behavior?

Persons using the Internet to retrieve medical information generate large amounts of health-related data, which are increasingly used in modern health sciences. We analyzed the relation between annual prescription volumes (APVs) of several antidepressants with marketing approval in Germany and corresponding web search query data generated in Google to test whether web search query volume may be a proxy for medical prescription practice. We obtained APVs of several antidepressants related to corresponding prescriptions at the expense of the statutory health insurance in Germany from 2004 to 2013. Web search query data generated in Germany and related to defined search terms (active substance or brand name) were obtained with Google Trends. We calculated correlations (Person's r) between the APVs of each substance and the respective annual "search share" values; coefficients of determination (R) were computed to determine the amount of variability shared by the 2 variables. Significant and strong correlations between substance-specific APVs and corresponding annual query volumes were found for each substance during the observational interval: agomelatine (r = 0.968, R = 0.932, P = 0.01), bupropion (r = 0.962, R = 0.925, P = 0.01), citalopram (r = 0.970, R = 0.941, P = 0.01), escitalopram (r = 0.824, R = 0.682, P = 0.01), fluoxetine (r = 0.885, R = 0.783, P = 0.01), paroxetine (r = 0.801, R = 0.641, P = 0.01), and sertraline (r = 0.880, R = 0.689, P = 0.01). Although the used data did not allow to perform an analysis with a higher temporal resolution (quarters, months), our results suggest that web search query volume may be a proxy for corresponding prescription behavior. However, further studies analyzing other pharmacologic agents and prescription data that facilitate an increased temporal resolution are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Association between haemorrhages and treatment with selective and non-selective serotonergic antidepressants: Possible implications of quantitative signal detection.

Inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets seems to be the crucial mechanism underlying SSRI-associated haemorrhages. This effect is also present in antidepressants featuring non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (non-SSRI). Impact of selectivity of serotonin reuptake and/or affinity to the serotonin reuptake transporter on the bleeding risk have not yet been studied sufficiently. We retrieved country- and SSRI-/non-SSRI-specific data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre and used a case/non-case approach to calculate substance-specific reporting odds ratios (ROR) to evaluate the statistical association of treatment with SSRI/non-SSRI and haemorrhages. Country-specific analysis revealed no clear trends towards an increased risk of bleeding related to particular agents of group SSRI/non-SSRI (sporadically ROR>1 for citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, St. John's wort). There was a clear trend in the total dataset towards a "reduced protective effect" (suggested by ROR<1) on the development of haemorrhages with agents featuring comparatively high affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with escitalopram, citalopram, duloxetine or venlafaxine) in comparison to agents with lower affinity or non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with mirtazapine or doxepin). Comparison of group-specific aggregated data (SSRI vs. non-SSRI) revealed significant differences regarding the "protective effect" on the development of haemorrhages between groups SSRI vs. non-SSRI in favour of non-SSRI in nearly all countries as well as in the total dataset. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that agents with increased affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding.

Hepatotoxicity associated with agomelatine and other antidepressants: Disproportionality analysis using pooled pharmacovigilance data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre.

Since its marketing approval, the attention to the hepatic side-effect profile of the antidepressant agomelatine (AGM) has gradually increased. Several cases of severe hepatotoxic adverse drug reactions (ADR) have been reported and the European Medicines Agency has released a safety warning regarding AGM-associated hepatotoxicity. However, there are insufficient data for an adequate safety assessment of AGM-related hepatotoxicity. Therefore, we performed a quantitative signal detection analysis using pharmacovigilance data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre from the WHO that records ADR data from worldwide sources; we calculated reporting odds ratios (ROR) as measures for disproportionality within a case/non-case approach for AGM and several other antidepressants. AGM was statistically associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity (ROR 6.4 [95%CI 5.7-7.2]) as well as both positive controls: amineptine (ROR 38.4 [95%CI 33.8-43.6]) and nefazodone (ROR 3.2 [95%CI 3.0-3.5]). Following amineptine, AGM was associated with the second highest ROR, followed by tianeptine (ROR 4.4 [95%CI 3.6-5.3]), mianserin (ROR 3.6 [95%CI 3.3-3.9]), and nefazodone. These results support the hypothesis that AGM is associated with relevant hepatotoxicity. However, the used data and applied method do not allow a quantitative evaluation of hepatotoxicity or assessment of substance-specific differences regarding the extent of hepatotoxicity.