Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 50(3): 436-443, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061429

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence of clinical and ultrasonographic musculoskeletal involvement in Italian patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: In this cross-sectional multicenter study, 148 consecutive patients with IBD were evaluated by a gastroenterologist and a rheumatologist. All patients underwent a B-mode and power Doppler ultrasonographic examination of 6 pairs of entheses and of knee and ankle joints. RESULTS: A positive history for at least one musculoskeletal manifestation was reported by 40.5% of patients, more frequently in ulcerative colitis (UC) (p = 0.033). Inflammatory back pain was reported by 13.5% of patients, and a past history of peripheral arthritis by 14.9%, entheseal inflammation by 14.2% and dactylitis by 2.7%. At clinical examination, arthritis was observed in 19.6% of patients and enthesitis in 33%. Oligoarthritis and enthesitis at clinical examination were more frequently observed in UC than in Crohn disease (CD). 37.8% of total IBD patients fulfilled ASAS classification criteria for axial and/or peripheral spondyloarthritis, 8.1% ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, and 29.7% ASAS classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis. With ultrasonographic examination, signs of entheseal involvement were observed in 87.8% of patients, while at power Doppler, ≥1 abnormality was observed in 27.1%. ASAS+ patients compared to those ASAS- had a significantly higher frequency at ultrasonography of acute entheseal abnormalities, power Doppler entheseal positivity and joint involvement. These abnormalities at ultrasonography were also observed in 34%, 13% and 12% of ASAS- patients. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal manifestations occur frequently in patients with IBD. Ultrasonographic entheseal and joint involvement were also observed in asymptomatic patients.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Spondylarthropathies/epidemiology , Adult , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Italy/epidemiology , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Spondylarthropathies/diagnosis , Ultrasonography, Doppler
2.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 6(6): 227-33, 2014 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24932374

ABSTRACT

Colonoscopy is the reference method in the secondary prevention, diagnosis and, in some cases, treatment of colorectal cancer. It can often cause pain associated with embarrassment, anxiety, and physical and emotional discomfort. Pain intensity is influenced by a lot of factors, and there is a strict relationship among pain, pain perception, and mind. Several methods can be used to break the trinomial colonoscopy, pain and fear. Sedoanalgesia is recommended by several guidelines. If no sedation is offered, the patient must accept a higher chance of unacceptable discomfort and the endoscopist a lower chance of completing the procedure because of patient discomfort. Other non-pharmacologic methods such as acupuncture, music, and hydrocolonoscopy can be used as alternatives to pharmacologic sedoanalgesia. Furthermore, new endoscopic technologies such as variable-stiffness colonoscopes and ultrathin colonoscopes, or the use of carbon dioxide instead of air for colon insufflation, can reduce the pain caused by colonoscopy. In the future, technical improvements such as wireless capsules or robotic probes, will probably enable to overcome the present concept of colonoscopy, avoiding the use of traditional endoscopes. However, at present the poor attention paid by endoscopists to the pain and discomfort caused by colonoscopy can not be justified. There are several methods to reduce pain and anxiety and to break the trinomial colonoscopy, pain and fear. We must use them.

3.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 5(10): 502-7, 2013 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24147194

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate whether discharge scoring criteria are as safe as clinical criteria for discharge decision and allow for earlier discharge. METHODS: About 220 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation with Meperidine plus Midazolam were enrolled and assigned to 2 groups: in Control-group (110 subjects) discharge decision was based on the clinical assessment; in PADSS-group (110 subjects) discharge decision was based on the modified Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS). Measurements of the PADDS score were taken every 20 min after colonoscopy, and patients were discharged after two consecutive PADSS scores ≥ 9. The investigator called each patient 24-48 h after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire, to detect any delayed complications. Patients in which cecal intubation was not performed and those who were not found at follow-up phone call were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (7 in Control-group and 6 in PADSS-group) were excluded from the study. Recovery from sedation was faster in PADSS-group than in Control-group (58.75 ± 18.67 min vs 95.14 ± 10.85 min, respectively; P < 0.001). Recovery time resulted shorter than 60 min in 39 patients of PADSS-group (37.5%), and in no patient of Control-group (P < 0.001). At follow-up phone call, no patient declared any hospital re-admission because of problems related to colonoscopy and/or sedation. Mild delayed post-discharge symptoms occurred in 57 patients in Control-group (55.3%) and in 32 in PADSS-group (30.7%). The most common symptoms were drowsiness, weakness, abdominal distension, and headache. Only 3 subjects needed to take some drugs because of post-discharge symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System is as safe as the clinical assessment and allows for an earlier patient discharge after colonoscopy performed under sedation.

5.
J Med Case Rep ; 5: 90, 2011 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21371340

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest that mucosal abnormalities can occur even in the duodenum, jejunum, and distal ileum of cirrhosis patients. We present a case of portal hypertensive enteropathy in a cirrhosis patient shown by capsule endoscopy and the effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on the ileal pictures. CASE PRESENTATION: An 83-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to our hospital for anemia and a positive fecal occult blood test. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed small varices without bleeding signs and hypertensive gastropathy. Colonoscopy was negative. To rule out any other cause of bleeding, capsule endoscopy was performed; capsule endoscopy revealed severe hyperemia of the jejunum-ileal mucosa with active bleeding. Because of the persistence of anemia and the frequent blood transfusions, not responding to ß-blocker drugs or octreotide infusion, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed. Anemia improved quickly after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and no further blood transfusion was necessary in the follow-up. The patient developed portal encephalopathy two months later and was readmitted to our department. We repeated the capsule endoscopy that showed a significant improvement of the gastric and ileal mucosa without any signs of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive enteropathy is a rare condition, but it seems more common with the introduction of capsule endoscopy in clinical practice. This case shows that the jejunum can be a source of bleeding in cirrhosis patients, and this is the first demonstration of its resolution after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.

6.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 38(5): 403-6, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18538828

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe an unusual case of Whipple disease (WD) with confusing clinical features at onset and to discuss the diagnostic challenges for the clinician. METHODS: Description of a new case of this rare disease and thorough discussion of the atypical clinical manifestations at onset. A literature review, concerning the unusual onset, by means of a MEDLINE search from 1966 to 2007 was done. RESULTS: A 39-year-old man with sudden bilateral blurred vision due to retinal vasculitis and concomitant rapidly evolving symmetrical neurosensory bilateral hearing loss as initial features of WD is described. Due to the clinical manifestations resembling systemic vasculitis, high-dose corticosteroid and pulse cyclophosphamide therapy were started with subsequent appearance of gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea and weight loss) and spiking fever, suggesting superimposed infection. After a complete evaluation, including gastroscopy, extensive duodenal-jejunal mucosal involvement was seen, while diffuse infiltration of the duodenal lamina propria with periodic acid-Schiff-positive foamy macrophages was observed on the histological sample. The diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for the DNA of Tropheryma whippelii. To our knowledge, no previous similar clinical onset of WD has been described. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid misdiagnosis and therapeutic mistakes, clinicians should be aware of unusual presentations of WD. Because this etiological agent is a difficult to isolate bacterium, diagnosis may be especially problematic in cases without intestinal involvement at onset.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Bilateral/microbiology , Retinal Vasculitis/microbiology , Tropheryma/isolation & purification , Whipple Disease/complications , Whipple Disease/diagnosis , Adult , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Diarrhea/microbiology , Gastroscopy , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Retinal Vasculitis/drug therapy , Weight Loss , Whipple Disease/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...