Prevalence of US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease Reporting Barriers to Clinician Office Visits: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE MODELS FOR CARDIAC REHABILITATION.

PURPOSE: Despite known health benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), only a quarter of eligible patients attend. Among CR barriers are physical (eg, walking) and in-person attendance limitations. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of difficulty walking and dependence on another person to attend medical appointments among people with and without CVD using national survey data. METHODS: We compared the prevalence of difficulty walking and difficulty attending medical appointments alone among adults with and without CVD using national survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2015-2019. We used logistic regression and Rao-Scott χ2 analysis while controlling for several social determinants of health as covariates. RESULTS: Of 2 212 973 respondents, 200 087 (9.04%) had CVD. The odds of individuals with CVD experiencing either difficulty walking or difficulty attending medical appointments alone were >3 times greater than the odds for individuals without CVD. In all adults with CVD, 42% reported difficulty walking and 20% reported dependence on another person to attend medical appointments. In all adults with CVD, 46% reported difficulty with one or both difficulties compared with 14% of adults without CVD. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that 11.9 million Americans with self-reported CVD have difficulty walking, or are dependent on another person to attend medical appointments, or both. Alternative models of CR that adapt to these limitations are needed to increase attendance of CR so that all adults with CVD can improve their health outcomes.

Police use of force standards and mental health crises in the United States: Identifying research and policymaking targets.

An area of psychology-law research and policy that requires increased attention is the use of force during encounters with someone in mental health crisis. Cases in which law enforcement officer (LEO) intervention during a mental health crisis leads to injury or death of the person in crisis underscore the need to understand what behaviors and circumstances are relevant in excessive force litigation, what concepts may benefit from empirical research, and what facets of policies and precedent may require modification. In particular, the current national and international attention to the United States' external mechanisms of control over police conduct (i.e., criminal and civil proceedings against officers) suggests that excessive force jurisprudence is ripe for examination of its utility and fairness in shaping how police should interact with people with mental illness. Excessive force jurisprudence contains complex legal standards with which many psychology-law practitioners, researchers, and even policymakers are likely unfamiliar, however. The current paper explicates external methods of control over police conduct in the United States by reviewing excessive force jurisprudence and identifying points in need of research and policy attention.

Marshaling administrative data to study the prevalence of mental illness in assault on law enforcement cases.

A substantial body of literature has investigated many issues surrounding police encounters with persons with mental illness. This paper focuses on a specific type of encounter - individuals with mental illness charged with assaulting officers because of their behavior during a psychiatric crisis - and uses administrative data to examine its prevalence in one state. Results suggest that individuals with mental health histories comprise a small but meaningful percentage (c. 9%) of assault on law enforcement charges, and c. 10% of these charges have an offense date within 14 days of an emergency mental health custody order, increasing the likelihood that psychiatric symptoms influenced their behavior at the time of the offense. Further results describe different categories of relevant charges, charge classifications, final dispositions, and sentences. Results are discussed in the context of outcomes for persons with mental illness and law enforcement as well as the role and limitations of forensic mental health assessment in these cases. The paper concludes with a call for similar data collection across jurisdictions.

Advance directives for mental health care: innovation in law, policy, and practice.

Virginia appears to be the first state to commit itself to statewide implementation of psychiatric advance directives, and its experience may be highly instructive for other states. The project began with consensus building among stakeholders (2007-2009), followed by revisions to Virginia's Health Care Decisions Act (2009-2010) and designation of five of the state's 40 Community Services Boards as demonstration sites for facilitation efforts. Early implementation efforts quickly showed that psychiatric advance directives are not self-executing innovations. This column describes the early policy and practice innovations, lessons learned from initial implementation efforts, and three approaches to facilitating completion of advance directives by consumers.

Embedding advance directives in routine care for persons with serious mental illness: implementation challenges.

For people with serious mental illness, research demonstrates the potential positive effects of having an advance directive with specific instructions for mental health care. The Commonwealth of Virginia has undertaken efforts to incorporate the completion of psychiatric advance directives into routine mental health services for individuals with serious mental illness. The inherent complexities of advance directives-a single legal tool for use by a heterogeneous array of consumers, providers, and organizations-have led to more barriers than had been anticipated. This article describes challenges encountered in the first three years of implementation efforts. Data are from feedback on early training attempts and experiences of staff at pilot sites and work groups convened for the implementation project. The authors describe a range of challenges, such as how to present a complete and clear message about the nature, purposes, and potential advantages of psychiatric advance directives to various audiences, in particular their use in recovery-oriented care; how to promote cross-system collaboration among potential users of these directives; and how to overcome resource constraints and sustain interest in the process. Virginia's experience reinforces the importance of developing multifaceted implementation strategies, such as the creation of informational and training tools to spread implementation more effectively, the identification of "champions" or staff members who are invested in implementation, and the development of multiple approaches to facilitating completion of advance directives by consumers.

Juveniles' Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors.

This study examined juvenile justice-involved youths' understanding and appreciation of the Miranda warnings' rights to silence and legal counsel using the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments (Goldstein, Zelle, & Grisso, 2012). It also examined the relationships between totality of circumstances factors and understanding and appreciation of rights. Data were collected from 183 youths (140 boys) in pre- and postadjudication facilities in 2 states. Overall, youths demonstrated greater difficulty on measures of appreciation than understanding, with particular deficits in their abilities to comprehend the abstract concept of the right to silence. Results varied slightly by instrument, highlighting the importance of a multimodal assessment of these complex abilities. Examination of totality of circumstances factors identified relationships between some factors (e.g., age, verbal IQ, academic achievement) and Miranda comprehension, but revealed that other factors (e.g., gender, number of previous arrests) were not significantly related to Miranda understanding or appreciation. The findings support a nuanced conceptualization of Miranda rights comprehension that acknowledges the complexity of understanding and appreciating the warnings. Empirical analyses also support the continued use of some totality of circumstances factors and abandonment of others. Findings underscore the necessity of multimodal assessment and interpretation when conducting capacity to waive Miranda rights evaluations.

Psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments with a juvenile justice sample.

This article describes the psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments, the revised version of Grisso's Miranda instruments. The original instruments demonstrated good reliability and validity in a normative sample. The revised instruments updated the content of the original instruments and were administered to a sample of 183 youth in pre- and postadjudication facilities. Analyses were conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the revised instruments and included similar analyses to those conducted by Grisso, as well as additional calculations (e.g., standard errors of measurement, intraclass correlation coefficients, Kappa coefficients). Results revealed sound psychometric properties, similar to those observed for the original instruments.