Preclinical profile of a novel metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 positive allosteric modulator.

Recent reports have indicated that patients with schizophrenia have a profound hypo-functionality of glutamatergic signaling pathways. Positive allosteric modulation of mGlu(5) receptor has been postulated to augment NMDA function and thereby alleviate the glutamatergic hypo-function observed in schizophrenic patients. Here we report the in vitro and in vivo characterization of CPPZ (1-(4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-(pyridin-4-ylmethoxy)ethanone), a structurally novel positive allosteric modulator selective for mGlu(5) receptor. In HEK293 cells stably over-expressing human mGlu(5) receptor, CPPZ potentiates the intracellular calcium response elicited by a suboptimal concentration of the endogenous agonist glutamate. CPPZ does not have any intrinsic agonist activity and behaves functionally as a positive allosteric modulator. This is further supported by binding data, which demonstrate that CPPZ is able to displace the negative allosteric modulator MPEP but does not compete with the orthosteric ligand quisqualic acid. Instead, CPPZ enhances the binding of the orthosteric ligand. In native preparations, CPPZ potentiates calcium flux in rat cortical neurons stimulated with the group I agonist dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG). In addition, CPPZ modulates long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices, a process known to be NMDA dependent. In vivo, CPPZ reverses hyper locomotion triggered by the NMDA open channel blocker MK801 in CD1 mice. CPPZ was also able to reduce rat conditioned avoidance responding to electric shock. Both in vitro and in vivo data demonstrate that this novel compound acts as an mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator, which modulates NMDA dependent responses and suggests that the enhancement of mGlu(5) receptor activity may prove useful in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 8-(pyrid-3-yl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazines: potent, orally bioavailable corticotropin releasing factor receptor-1 (CRF1) antagonists.

This report describes the syntheses and structure-activity relationships of 8-(substituted pyridyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazine corticotropin releasing factor receptor-1 (CRF(1)) receptor antagonists. These CRF(1) receptor antagonists may be potential anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs. This research resulted in the discovery of compound 13-15, which is a potent, selective CRF(1) antagonist (hCRF(1) IC(50) = 6.1 +/- 0.6 nM) with weak affinity for the CRF-binding protein and biogenic amine receptors. This compound also has a good pharmacokinetic profile in dogs. Analogue 13-15 is orally effective in two rat models of anxiety: the defensive withdrawal (situational anxiety) model and the elevated plus maze test. Analogue 13-15 has been advanced to clinical trials.

Anxiolytic-like effects of the corticotropin-releasing factor1 (CRF1) antagonist DMP904 [4-(3-pentylamino)-2,7-dimethyl-8-(2-methyl-4-methoxyphenyl)-pyrazolo-[1,5-a]-pyrimidine] administered acutely or chronically at doses occupying central CRF1 receptors in rats.

Corticotropin-releasing factor(1) (CRF(1)) antagonists may be effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders with fewer side effects compared with classic benzodiazepines. The behavioral effects of DMP904 [4-(3-pentylamino)-2,7-dimethyl-8-(2-methyl-4-methoxyphenyl)-pyrazolo-[1,5-a]-pyrimidine] and its effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis were related to its levels in plasma and estimated occupancy of central CRF(1) receptors. DMP904 (10-30 mg/kg, p.o.) and alprazolam (10 mg/kg, p.o.) increased time spent in open arms of an elevated-plus maze. In addition, acutely or chronically (14 days) administered DMP904 (1.0-30 mg/kg, p.o.) and acute alprazolam (1.0-3.0 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced exit latency in the defensive withdrawal model of anxiety in rats, suggesting that tolerance may not develop to the anxiolytic-like effects of DMP904 in this model of anxiety. Acutely, DMP904 reversed the stress-induced increase in plasma corticosterone levels in defensive withdrawal at doses of 3.0 mg/kg and higher. These doses also resulted in levels of DMP904 in plasma similar to (for anxiolytic-like effects) or 4-fold higher (for effects on the HPA axis) than the in vitro IC(50) value for binding affinity at CRF(1) receptors and greater than 50% occupancy of CRF(1) receptors. Unlike alprazolam, DMP904 did not produce sedation, ataxia, or chlordiazepoxide-like subjective effects (as measured by locomotor activity, rotorod performance, and chlordiazepoxide discrimination assays, respectively) at doses at least 3-fold higher than anxiolytic-like doses. In conclusion, anxiolytic-like effects and effects on the stress-activated HPA axis of DMP904 in the defensive withdrawal model of anxiety required 50% or greater occupancy of central CRF(1) receptors. This level of CRF(1) receptor occupancy resulted in fewer motoric side effects compared with classic benzodiazepines.

The anxiolytic CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 fails to function as a discriminative stimulus and does not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats.

RATIONALE: Compounds with a mechanism of action different from benzodiazepines may retain the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines with fewer side effects. CRF(1) antagonists have anxiolytic-like effects but may have different discriminative stimulus (DS) effects compared with benzodiazepines. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the similarity of DS effects of a CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 to the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide and the ability of DMP696 to produce DS effects on its own using drug discrimination procedures, as well as its anxiolytic-like effects after acute or chronic administration. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (5.0 mg/kg, IP, 30 min prior to session) from vehicle under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement and drug- or vehicle-lever selection following administration of DMP696 was determined. The effects of DMP696 on latency to exit a dark chamber (defensive withdrawal model of anxiety) were used as an index of anxiolytic-like activity. RESULTS: In chlordiazepoxide-trained rats, DMP696 (1.0-100 mg/kg, PO) resulted in most of the animals selecting the vehicle lever, as did another anxiolytic, the 5-HT(1A) partial agonist buspirone (0.3-10 mg/kg, IP). DMP696 reduced exit latency in defensive withdrawal at 10 mg/kg administered either acutely or chronically for 14 days. Thus, the doses of DMP696 studied in drug discrimination were up to 10-fold higher than those active in the anxiety model. In addition, DMP696 (10-60 mg/kg, PO) could not be established as a DS under the conditions used in this study. In a subsequent study, chlordiazepoxide was established as a DS in these same animals. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of substitution of DMP696 for the chlordiazepoxide DS in rats and its inability to acquire DS properties suggest that the DS effects of DMP696 differ from those of benzodiazepines.

The CRF(1) receptor antagonist DMP696 produces anxiolytic effects and inhibits the stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation without sedation or ataxia in rats.

RATIONALE: CRF(1) antagonists may be effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders while having fewer side effects compared with classical benzodiazepines. OBJECTIVES: The effects of a small molecule selective CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 on anxiety-like behaviors and stress-induced increases in corticosterone in rats exposed to a novel environment and on locomotor activity and motor coordination were determined in rats. These effects of DMP696 were compared with those produced by the classical benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (CDP). METHODS: DMP696 or CDP were administered PO, 60 minutes before behavioral testing in rats. Their effects on latency to exit a dark chamber and stress-induced increase in corticosterone in the Defensive Withdrawal test (an animal model of anxiety), locomotor activity, and rotorod performance (measure of ataxia) were determined. RESULTS: DMP696 significantly reduced exit latency and reversed the stress-induced increase in corticosterone in the Defensive Withdrawal test at doses of 3.0-10 mg/kg and higher. In contrast, CDP significantly decreased exit latency at 10 and 30 mg/kg, but not at 100 mg/kg, due to concurrent non-specific side effects. Unlike DMP696, CDP had no effect on the stress-induced increase in corticosterone at lower doses, but resulted in a significant increase at higher doses. DMP696 did not reduce locomotor activity or impair motor coordination at doses up to 30-fold higher than doses effective in the Defensive Withdrawal model. In contrast, CDP produced significant sedation and ataxia at the same doses that were effective in reducing exit latency. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 might retain the therapeutic benefits of classical benzodiazepines but have fewer motoric side effects.