C1-C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Pediatric Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Initial Results and Long-term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies reporting the use of atlantoaxial pedicle screws and the long-term effects of C1-C2 posterior fusion in children. Our study is to investigate the initial results of C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation for pediatric atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and assessed spontaneous change of postoperative radiography after a long-term follow-up period. METHODS: Posterior pedicle screw fixations were performed in 21 pediatric patients with AAD. All the patients underwent implant removal 1 year after their initial surgery and had regular follow-up with an average duration of 76.4 months (range, 52 to 117 mo). Clinical and radiographic data were then collected and compared. RESULTS: Frankel Grade was significantly improved at 3 months follow-up compared with pretreatment values. All patients had good bony fusion at a mean of 4.2±0.9 months (range, 3 to 6 mo) after treatment. None of the patients experienced worsening neurological symptoms or injury to the vertebral artery. However, 2 cases experienced minor complications. Following removal of the implants, no spinal deformities or subaxial instabilities were found. The mean angle of sagittal curvature increased from 12.1±2.4 degrees (range, 0 to 22 degrees) immediately postoperatively to 19.1±2.7 degrees (range, 6 to 31 degrees) at the final follow-up (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation could achieve satisfactory initial results for the management of the pediatric AAD. Moreover, removal of the metal implant after bony fusion did not increase the risk of spinal deformity or subaxial instability at long-term follow-up.

Comparison of Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation is used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, no randomized controlled studies have compared the efficacy of the two approaches--the Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine without neurological deficit were randomized to receive either the Wiltse's paraspinal approach (group A, 24 patients) or open book laminectomy (group B, 23 patients). Patients were followed postoperatively for average of 27.4 months. Clinical and radiographic data of the two approaches were collected and compared. RESULTS: Our results showed the anterior segmental height, kyphotic angle, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Smiley-Webster Scale (SWS) score significantly improved postoperatively in both groups, indicating that both the Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy can effectively treat thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures. The Wiltse's paraspinal approach was found to have significantly shorter operating time, less blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay compared to open book laminectomy. However, there were two (2/24) patients in group A that had neurological deficits postoperatively and required a second exploratory operation. Dural tears and/or cauda equina entrapment were subsequently found in four patients in group B and all two patients of neurological deficits in group A during operation. No screw loosening, plate breakage, or other internal fixation failures were found at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that either of the two surgical approaches can achieve satisfactory results in treating thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with greenstick lamina fractures. However, if there is any clinical or radiographic suspicion of a dural tear and/or cauda equina entrapment pre-operation, patients should receive an open book laminectomy to avoid a second exploratory operation. More research is still needed to optimize clinical decision-making regarding surgical approach.