ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative antibiotics (PA) are often administered to patients after instrumented spinal surgery until all drains are removed to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). This practice is discouraged by numerous medical society guidelines, so our institutional Neurosurgery Quality Improvement Committee decided to discontinue use of PA for this population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for patients who had instrumented spinal surgery at our institution for seven months before and after this policy change and compared the frequency of SSI and development of antibiotic related complications in patients who received PA to those who did not (non-PA). RESULTS: We identified 188 PA patients and 158 non-PA patients. Discontinuation of PA did not result in an increase in frequency of SSI (2% of PA patients vs. 0.6% of non-PA patients, p = .4). Growth of resistant bacteria was not significantly reduced in the non-PA period in comparison to the PA period (2% in the PA period and 1% in the non-PA period). The cost of antibiotics for PA patients was $5,499.62, whereas the cost of antibiotics for the non-PA patients was $0. On a per patient basis, the cost associated with antibiotics and resistant infections was significantly greater for patients who received PA than for those who did not (median of $26.32 with IQR $9.87-$46.06 vs. median of $0 with IQR $0-$0; p < .0001). CONCLUSION: After discontinuing PA for patients who had instrumented spinal procedures, we did not observe an increase in the frequency of SSI. We did, however, note that there was a non-significant decrease in the frequency of growth of resistant organisms. These findings suggest that patients in this population do not need PA, and complications can be reduced if PA are withheld.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Care , Spinal Fusion/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Costs , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/economics , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its association with cardiac outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). BACKGROUND: LVADs are pivotal treatments for end-stage heart failure and a critical bridge to heart transplantation. METHODS: Medical records of 249 consecutive patients who received an LVAD at Columbia University Medical Center were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical variables, medications, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association of clinical variables with the presence of AF. RESULTS: Overall, AF was documented in 80 patients (32%) following LVAD placement. Before LVAD placement, 182 patients had no history of AF, whereas 67 patients had documented AF. Among these 67 patients, 56 (84%) continued to have AF following LVAD placement; 24 patients without a history of AF (13%) developed AF after LVAD placement. Patients manifesting AF after LVAD placement were more likely to have had AF before LVAD insertion (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in risk of stroke or death for patients with AF before or following LVAD insertion. CONCLUSIONS: AF is common in patients with LVADs, with 32% manifesting AF after placement of their LVAD, including 13% without a prior documented history of AF. The presence of AF was not associated with increased risk of death or stroke.
