ABSTRACT
Sixteen patients (15 males, aged 48-70) affected by liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices were subjected to duplex-Doppler ultrasonographic study (DDUS). Four patients (three with a portal thrombosis and one with a hepatofugal portal flow) were excluded from the subsequent pharmacological test. The twelve remaining patients took part in a double blind cross-over study that evaluated the variations of heart rate (HR), mean systemic arterial pressure (SAP), portal vein diameter (PVD), maximal and mean portal flow velocity (PFV) after the administration of either 40 mg of propranolol or placebo per os, on two consecutive days. Propranolol caused no significant variation in mean SAP and in PVD, whereas it reduced the HR from 67.7 +/- 8.0 to 58.4 +/- 7.0 beats/min (mean +/- s.d.; P less than 0.001); the maxPFV dropped from 18.2 +/- 5.4 to 14.0 +/- 3.7 cm/s (P less than 0.001) and the meanPFV dropped from 15.3 +/- 4.1 to 13.2 +/- 3.1 cm/s (P less than 0.005). No significant variation was observed with placebo. After propranolol administration eight patients exhibited a significant maxPFV decrease, whereas the other four patients exhibited only a drop in HR, suggesting either drug inefficacy, inappropriate dosage or inadequate duration of treatment. DDUS is the only non-invasive method for the examination of the portal vein system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Portal/diagnostic imaging , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnostic imaging , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Aged , Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Evaluation , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/drug therapy , Hypertension, Portal/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/physiopathology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Portal Vein , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Ultrasonics , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
In Italy the incidence of hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis is estimated approximately 5% per year. The new imaging technologies make it possible to perform screening programs for the early detection of HCC in these patients; early diagnosis of HCC is recommended as the best strategy in order to enable surgical approach, which seems to be the only effective therapy: screening programs must consider the cost-benefit ratio in the choice of patients and standards of investigation. In the Japanese authors' opinion all patients with liver cirrhosis must be screened every three months with an ultrasonographic liver examination (US) and a measurement of serum alpha-1-fetoprotein level (AFP) and every nine months with a computed tomography (CT) of the liver: at a 5% annual incidence of HCC the cost of a single diagnosis is estimated about 8000 +. In our opinion the cirrhotic patients in Child's C class (approximately 20%) can be excluded from the screening programs, since the survival expectation of these patients is always poor, whether HCC is present or not. Furthermore, considering the acknowledged reliability of the US in the detection of space occupying lesions of the liver, periodical CT examination seems to be unproductive. AFP has a low sensibility as a marker of HCC; nevertheless a progressive increase of its levels can be considered an index of possible blastomatous transformation of cirrhotic liver. In comparison with the Japanese screening programs, the proposed changes might obtain a 55% reduction of the cost of a single diagnosis of HCC, without significant diagnostic loss.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
