Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 23(3): 477-83, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22569431

ABSTRACT

Chronic inflammation is highly prevalent in patients on hemodialysis (HD), as evidenced by increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). We compared CRP to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to determine whether it has any clinical implications and prognostic significance in terms of mortality. CRP was measured using a standard immunoturbidometric assay on the COBAS® INTEGRA system and hs-CRP was measured using the Dade Behring on the Konelab Nephelometer in 50 patients on HD. CRP (≥6 mg/L) and hs-CRP (≥3 mg/L) levels were elevated in 30% and 54% of the patients, respectively. A significant correlation was noted between hs-CRP and CRP levels (r = 0.98, P <0.001). Deming regression analysis showed that the slope was near one (r = 0.90; 0.83-0.94) and that the intercept was small. Multivariate regression confirmed that age above 40 years (RR = 3.69, P = 0.027) and duration on HD greater than five years (RR = 3.71, P = 0.028) remained significant independent predictors of serum hs-CRP. Thirteen patients died during follow-up (26%). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that hs-CRP (RR = 1.062, P = 0.03) and CRP levels (RR = 1.057, P = 0.009) and age (RR = 1.078, P = 0.001) were the most powerful predictors of mortality. The CRP standard assay presents a reasonable alternative to the hs-CRP assay in patients on HD. The advantages of the CRP standard assay are its online and real-time availability as well as lower costs, particularly in developing countries.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Kidney Diseases/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Diseases/blood , Kidney Diseases/immunology , Kidney Diseases/mortality , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nephelometry and Turbidimetry , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tunisia
2.
Tunis Med ; 84(11): 751-7, 2006 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17294906

ABSTRACT

The recent development of new biochemical markers has considerably improved the non invasive exploration of bone turnover. Currently, the most sensitive markers to access bone formation are osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen. Blood or urinary immunoassays of pyridinoline, deoxy-pyridinoline and terminal telopeptides type I of collagen are currently the best indices to evaluate the bone resorption. The principal application fields of biochemical markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis, in combination with the measurement of the bone mineral mass, are primarily the monitoring of anti-resorptive therapy response and prediction of bone loss and risk of fractures. In fact, treatment with anti-resorptive drugs is followed by rapid decrease of bone markers levels (3 months for the markers of resorption and 6 months for those of osteo-formation ), whereas the bone mineral density measurements requires at least two years to change significantly.


Subject(s)
Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Bone Remodeling , Collagen Type I/blood , Osteocalcin/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Peptides/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Development/drug effects , Bone Resorption/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy
3.
Tunis Med ; 83(10): 591-4, 2005 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16370207

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of fluid and diet restriction in fasting on biochemical factors of stone formation. Our study concernes 90 patients divided in three groups: healthy fasting patient (GI), healthy non fasting patient (G2) and non fasting patient with calcium lithiasis (G3). The promotors (oxalate, calcium, uric acid, phosphates) and inhibitors (citrate, magnesium) are statistically significant between G1, G2 and G3, G2. Supersaturation of urine with oxalate, uric acid and brushite are the same for (G1) and (G3) and higher than (G2). Crystalluria is more important in lithiasis subjects compared with healthy non fasting patients (58% vs 11,4%). Oxalate monohydrate (Whewellite) and uric crystal don't exist in the healthy non fasting people but reached 4% and 12% respectively in the lithiasis patient. The crystalluria profil is the same in the heathy fasting patients and calcium lithiasis patients. However healthy patients have equilibria between promotors and inhibitors of crystal formation which minimize the risk of crystalluria and subsequent stone formation.


Subject(s)
Fasting , Islam , Urinary Calculi/etiology , Adult , Crystallization , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Oxalic Acid/analysis , Urinalysis , Urine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...