Main controversies in breast cancer.

In this article, we have reviewed available evidence for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up in female breast cancer (BC). Into daily clinical practice some controversies are occurred. Especially, in the diagnosis field, despite the fact that the optimal age in which screening mammography should start is a subject of intense controversy, there is a shift toward the beginning at the age of 40 although it is suggested that the net benefit is small for women aged 40 to 49 years. In addition, a promising tool in BC screening seems to be breast tomosynthesis. Other tools such as 3D ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) are full of optimism in BC screening although ultrasonography is not yet a first-line screening method and there is insufficient evidence to recommend the systemic use of the SWE for BC screening. As for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), even if it is useful in BC detection in women who have a strong family history of BC, it is not generally recommended as a screening tool. Moreover, based on the lack of randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of presurgical breast MRI in overall survival, it's integration into breast surgical operations remains debatable. Interestingly, in contrast to fine needle aspiration, core biopsy has gained popularity in presurgical diagnosis. Furthermore, after conservative surgery in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, the recent tendency is the shift from axillary dissection to axillary conserving strategies. While the accuracy of sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and second BC surgery remains controversial, more time is needed for evaluation and for determining the optimal interval between the two surgeries. Additionally, in the decision between immediate or delayed breast reconstruction, there is a tendency in the immediate use. In the prevention of BC, the controversial issue between tamoxifen and raloxifene becomes clear with raloxifene be more profitable through the toxicities of tamoxifen. However, the prevention of bone metastasis with bisphosphonates is still conflicting. Last but not least, in the follow-up of BC survivors, mammography, history and physical examination are the means of an early detection of BC recurrence. ed.

Male breast hemangioma--a rare entity: a case report and review of the literature.

We report the case of a 77-year-old man with a very rare breast tumor: hemangioma. The clinical examination found a large (6 cm diameter) lump and mammography revealed a well-defined high-density lesion with lobulated contour. Simple mastectomy was performed. The histology confirmed the diagnosis of benign hemangioma. There has been no local recurrence after 9 years of follow-up. There is very little literature on this type of tumor in men. Generally hemangiomas are large and ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful for the diagnosis. The important differential diagnosis with angiosarcoma is based on specific histologic patterns. Moreover, malignant transformation of hemangioma is rare, but possible.

Liquid-based cytology in breast fine needle aspiration. Comparison with the conventional smear.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the various cytologic features on AutoCyte Prep (ACP) (AutoCyte, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and conventional preparation (CP) specimens from breast fine needle aspiration cytology material with a semi-quantitative scoring system. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 100 randomized cases were studied. In each case, 2 passes were performed. One pass was used for CPs (Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain). The other pass produced material for the ACP technique and Papanicolaou stain. Both the conventional and liquid-based preparations were studied independently by two observers and compared for cellularity, obscuring and/or informing background, representative diagnostic material, preservation of cytomorphologic features, presence of monolayer cells and architectural arrangement. RESULTS: Comparing the two preparations, the results were as follows: (1) ACP was superior to CP in 2 features, lack of obscuring background and presence of monolayer arrangement with preservation of cell architecture; (2) ACP was inferior to CP in 1 feature, lack of informing background; and (3) ACP was equal, with small deviations, to CP in the rest of the features evaluated: cellularity, representative diagnostic material, preservation of cell morphology and architectural arrangement. CONCLUSION: The new technology of liquid-based cytology in breast FNA showed a good correlation with CP plus the advantages of: (1) easier and less time consuming evaluation of cell morphology (clear background, no overlapping, smaller area to screen); (2) reproducibility, a factor of great importance to quality control; and (3) possibility of adjunctive investigations (immunocytology, flow cytometry) on the same material.