Effect of New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Quantitative Analysis of Airway Tree by Computer-Aided Detection Software in Chest Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Compared the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) software for quantitative analysis of airway using computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with versions of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) that either balances spatial and density resolution (MBIRSTND) or prefers spatial resolution (MBIRRP20), and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with lung kernel. METHODS: Thirty patients were included who were scanned for pulmonary disease using a routine dose multidetector CT system. Data were reconstructed with ASIR, MBIRSTND, and MBIRRP20. Airway dimensions from the 3 reconstructions were measured using an automated, quantitative CAD software designed to segment and quantify the bronchial tree automatically using a skeletonization algorithm. For each patient and reconstruction algorithm, the right middle lobe bronchus was selected as a representative for measuring the bronchial length of the matched airways. Two radiologists used a semiquantitative 5-point scale to rate the subjective image quality of MBIRSTND and MBIRRP20 reconstructions on airway trees analysis. RESULTS: Algorithm impacts the measurement variability of bronchus length in chest CT, MBIRRP20 were the best, whereas ASIR were the worst (P < 0.05). In addition, the optimal reconstruction algorithm was found to be MBIRSTND for the airway trees being assessed about subjective noise and MBIRRP20 about bronchial end shows, and there were no significant differences in the continuity and completeness of bronchial wall, whereas ASIR performed inferiorly compared with them (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASIR, MBIRSTND, and MBIRRP20 from MBIRn algorithm potentially allow the desired airway quantification accuracy to be achieved on the performance of CAD, especially for MBIRRP20.

Influence of virtual monochromatic spectral image at different energy levels on motion artifact correction in dual-energy spectral coronary CT angiography.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) CT images at different energy levels on the effectiveness of a motion correction technique (SSF) in dual-energy Spectral coronary CT angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 29 cases suspected of or diagnosed with coronary artery disease underwent Spectral CCTA using a prospective ECG triggering with 250 ms padding time. SSF was applied to the determined least-motion phase to generate 6 additional sets of VMS images with energy levels from 40 to 100 keV. CT value and standard deviation (SD) in the aortic root and epicardial adipose tissue were measured. Image quality of the RCA, LAD and LCX was evaluated on a per-vessel basis in each patient. Two reviewers evaluated the artery using the score of the segment. RESULTS: The low energy VMS images increased CT value and image noise compared with higher-energy VMS images, except 90 keV and 100 keV. The CNR of 40-70 keV were higher than those of 80-100 keV (P < 0.05). The image quality scores for images at 50-80 keV were higher than those of 40, 90, and 100 keV (P < 0.05), and the VMS image quality at 50 keV and 60 keV with SSF was the highest. CONCLUSION: SSF can effectively reduce the motion artifacts when coronary vessels have suitable contrast enhancement which can be achieved by adjusting energy levels of VMS images.

The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) image quality of new model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) with low-contrast resolution preference (MBIRNR40), conventional MBIR (MBIRc), and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at low dose with ASIR at routine-dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study included phantom and 60 patients who had initial and follow-up CT scans. For patients, the delay phase was acquired at routine-dose (noise index = 10 HU) for the initial scan and low dose (noise index = 20 HU) for the follow-up. The low-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% and 60% ASIR, MBIRc, and MBIRNR40, while routine-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% ASIR. CT value and noise measurements of the subcutaneous fat, back muscle, liver, and spleen parenchyma were compared using one-way ANOVA. Two radiologists used semiquantitative 7-scale (-3 to +3) to rate image quality and artifacts. RESULTS: The phantom study revealed superior low-contrast resolution with MBIRNR40. For patient scans, the CT dose index for the low-dose CT was 3.00 ± 1.32 mGy, 75% lower than the 11.90 ± 4.75 mGy for the routine-dose CT. Image noise for the low-dose MBIRNR40 images was significantly lower than the low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). Subjective ratings showed higher image quality for low-dose MBIRNR40, with lower noise, better low-contrast resolution for abdominal structures, and finer lesion contours than those of low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MBIRNR40 with low-contrast resolution preference provides significantly lower noise and better image quality than MBIRc and ASIR in low-dose abdominal CT; significantly better objective and subjective image quality than the routine-dose ASIR with 75% dose reduction.