Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Chromatogr A ; 1424: 134-8, 2015 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26585209

ABSTRACT

A fast and non-lethal in vivo solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sampling method for rat blood coupled to liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for monitoring rapid changes in concentrations of eicosanoids - lipid mediators involved in the development of inflammatory conditions - using diffusion-based calibration. Sampling rates of target eicosanoids were pre-determined under laboratory conditions with a precision of ≤10%, and directly used for quantification of analyte concentrations in blood after lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in Sprague-Dawley rats. Results showed significant changes in unbound plasma concentrations of arachidonic acid (AA) and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12-HETE) in response to the treatment. Next, performance of the proposed method was compared with protein precipitation (PP) of plasma, a conventional sample preparation technique. Finally, percentages of plasma protein binding (PPB) of specific eicosanoids were determined. PPB of target eicosanoids was in agreement with literature values, ranging from 99.3 to 99.9% for 12-HETE and DHA, respectively. We envision that the proposed method is a particularly suitable alternative to lethal sampling and current methods based on sample depletion in animal studies for accurate monitoring of rapid changes in blood concentrations of small molecules.


Subject(s)
Eicosanoids/blood , Animals , Calibration , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Lipopolysaccharides/pharmacology , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Specimen Handling , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
2.
Bioanalysis ; 3(1): 23-30, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21175364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A thin sheet of polydimethylsilosane membrane was used as an extraction phase for solid-phase microextraction. Compared with fiber or rod solid-phase microextraction geometries, the thin film exhibited much higher extraction capacity without sacrificing extraction time due to its higher area-to-volume ratio. The analytical method involved direct extraction of unconjugated testosterone (T) and epitestosterone (ET) followed by separation on a C18 column and detection by selected reaction monitoring in positive ionization mode. RESULTS: The limit of detection was 1 ng/l for both T and ET. After method validation, free (unconjugated) T and ET were extracted and quantified in real samples. Since T and ET are extensively metabolized, the proposed method was also applied to extract the steroids after enzymatic deconjugation of urinary-excreted steroid glucuronides. CONCLUSION: The proposed method allows quantification of both conjugated and unconjugated steroids, and revealed that there was a change in the ratio of T to ET after enzymatic deconjugation, indicating different rates of metabolism.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Epitestosterone/urine , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Testosterone/urine , Dimethylpolysiloxanes , Epitestosterone/isolation & purification , Glucuronides/metabolism , Humans , Limit of Detection , Membranes, Artificial , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization , Stereoisomerism , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Testosterone/isolation & purification
3.
J Chromatogr A ; 1216(14): 2928-33, 2009 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18752802

ABSTRACT

Sample preparation is often necessary to separate and concentrate various compounds prior to analysis of complex samples. In this regard, isoelectric focusing (IEF) is one of the best sample preparation methods. With this approach, however, carrier ampholytes have to be introduced into the samples, which may result in matrix interferences. In this paper, a simple ampholyte-free IEF free-flow electrophoresis design was developed for the separation of proteins. beta-Lactoglobulin, hemoglobin, myoglobin and cytochrome c were selected as model analytes. The experimental design took advantage of the electrolysis-driven production of H(+) and OH(-) ions that migrated from the anode and cathode, respectively, establishing a pH gradient spanning from 2.3 to 8.9. The separation chamber was filled with silanized glass beads as a support medium. Dialysis membranes were mounted at the two sides of the separation chamber (made of glass slides) and sealed with 2% agarose gel. The separated proteins drained from the outlets of the separation chamber and could be successfully collected into small glass tubes. The focusing process was visually observed and the separation was confirmed by capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) with pI markers.


Subject(s)
Isoelectric Focusing/methods , Proteins/isolation & purification , Buffers , Isoelectric Focusing/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...