A comprehensive analysis comparing the eighth AJCC gastric cancer pathological classification to the seventh, sixth, and fifth editions.

To perform a comprehensive analysis comparing the prognostic and discriminative ability of the eighth AJCC gastric cancer (GC) pathological classification to that of the seventh, sixth and fifth editions, and secondly to assess their long-term significance. Patients who had undergone R0 gastrectomy were identified and restaged accordingly. To evaluate and confirm any difference in prognostic ability between the competing editions, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were computed and compared since both have different analytic strengths. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% CI based on the time-dependent receiver-operating characteristics analyses were also calculated to assess any change in prognostic rankings from the first to tenth postoperative year. The rankings calculated by both statistical methods showed similar results, in which the seventh edition was identified as possessing the best prognostic ability. Additionally, these ranks were found to remain consistent over the ten postoperative years, but demonstrated no clinical significance as their respective 95% CIs calculated by the AIC, BIC, and AUC were found to overlap. However, the more detailed staging classifications of the eighth edition was shown to display the best prognostic demarcation for stratifying patients with higher-staged disease. This study thereby identified the eighth AJCC GC edition to possess similar long-term prognostic ability as to its previous three editions but contrastingly demonstrated the best distinctive ability for stratifying overall survival and can thus be considered as being clinically more reliable.

Lymph nodes ratio based nomogram predicts survival of resectable gastric cancer regardless of the number of examined lymph nodes.

To develop a nomogram to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients on the basis of metastatic lymph nodes ratio (mLNR), especially in the patients with total number of examined lymph nodes (TLN) less than 15. The nomogram was constructed based on a retrospective database that included 2,205 patients underwent curative resection in Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSUCC). Resectable gastric cancer (RGC) patients underwent curative resection before December 31, 2008 were assigned as the training set (n=1,470) and those between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012 were selected as the internal validation set (n=735). Additional external validations were also performed separately by an independent data set (n=602) from Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital (JXCH) in Jiangxi, China and a data set (n=3,317) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Independent risk factors were identified by Multivariate Cox Regression. In the SYSUCC set, TNM (Tumor-node-metastasis) and TRM-based (Tumor-Positive Nodes Ratio-Metastasis) nomograms were constructed respectively. The TNM-based nomogram showed better discrimination than the AJCC-TNM staging system (C-index: 0.73 versus 0.69, p<0.01). When the mLNR was included in the nomogram, the C-index increased to 0.76. Furthermore, the C-index in the TRM-based nomogram was similar between TLN ≥16 (C-index: 0.77) and TLN ≤15 (C-index: 0.75). The discrimination was further ascertained by internal and external validations. We developed and validated a novel TRM-based nomogram that provided more accurate prediction of survival for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection, regardless of the number of examined lymph nodes.

Prognostic value of pretreatment albumin-globulin ratio in predicting long-term mortality in gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 resection.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have highlighted the prognostic value of the albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) in various kinds of cancers. Our study was designed to assess whether AGR is associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 507 gastric cancer patients between 2005 and 2012 were included. The AGR was defined as the ratio of serum albumin to nonalbumin and calculated by the equation: albumin/(total protein - albumin). Furthermore, AGR was divided into two groups (low and high) using the X-tile software. Survival analysis stratified by AGR groups was performed. RESULTS: The mean survival time for each group was 36.62 months (95% CI: 33.92-39.32) for the low AGR group and 48.95 months (95% CI: 41.93-55.96, P=0.003) for the high AGR group. Patients in the high group (AGR ≥1.93) had a significantly lower 5-year mortality in comparison with the low group (AGR <1.93) (52.4% vs 78.5%, P=0.003). The high AGR group showed obviously better overall survival than the low AGR group according to Kaplan-Meier curves (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that AGR was an independent predictive factor of prognosis in gastric patients. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment AGR is a significant and independent predictive factor of prognosis.

The microRNA-423-3p-Bim Axis Promotes Cancer Progression and Activates Oncogenic Autophagy in Gastric Cancer.

Human serum microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to serve as disease fingerprints for predicting survival of cancer patients. However, the roles of specific miRNAs involved in gastric cancer (GC) are largely unknown. In this study, miRNA profiling was performed on sera obtained from six patients in good- and poor-survival groups. Expression of miR-423-3p was validated by quantitative RT-PCR in another 67 GC serum samples and paired normal and cancerous gastric tissues. Luciferase reporter assays were used to identify the target gene Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim). As a result, between the good-survival and poor-survival groups, the expression of nine serum miRNAs was altered more than two-fold. Among these, miR-423-3p was significantly increased in the poor-survival group, and its overexpression in GC tissues predicted poor survival in 119 patients with GC. miR-423-3p was found to promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in cell lines and animal models. Mechanistically, knockdown of the autophagy-related gene (Atg) 7 rescued the GC-promoting effect of miR-423-3p. In conclusion, miR-423-3p activates oncogenic and Beclin-1-dependent autophagy and promotes GC progression by reducing the expression of Bim. The newly identified miR-423-3p-Bim axis might be a potential therapeutic target in GC.

Impact of systemic inflammation on gastric cancer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) has been extensively validated in various cancers. We aimed to examine the usefulness of a combination of NLR and GPS (named CNG) for predicting survival outcomes in patients after curative resection for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 1056 patients who underwent curative resection as initial treatment for GC from October 2000 to September 2012. The preoperative CNG was calculated as follows: patients with hypoalbuminemia (< 35 g/L), elevated C-reactive protein (> 10 mg/L), and elevated NLR (≥ 2) were allocated a score of 3; patients with two, one, or no abnormal values were allocated a score of 2, 1, or 0, respectively. RESULTS: The NLR and GPS were the only inflammatory variables independently associated with overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis. When they were replaced by CNG in multivariate analysis, CNG was independently associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] for CNG 1 [1.367, 95% CI: 1.065-1.755; P = 0.014], CNG 2 [1.887, 95% CI: 1.182-3.011; P = 0.008], and CNG 3 [2.224, 95% CI: 1.238-3.997; P = 0.008]; P = 0.020). In stage-matched analysis, the prognostic significance was still maintained in stage I-III (P = 0.002, P = 0.042, and P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, 5-year survival rates ranged from 92% (stage I) to 35% (stage III) and from 65%(CNG 0) to 18%(CNG 3) with tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) stage or CNG alone. However, the combination of TNM and CNG stratified 5-year survival rates from 98% (TNM I, CNG 0) to 12% (TNM III, CNG 3). CONCLUSION: The preoperative CNG is a novel predictor of postoperative survival, and the combination of CNG and TNM effectively stratifies outcomes in patients after curative resection for GC.

A Novel Prognostic Score, Based on Preoperative Nutritional Status, Predicts Outcomes of Patients after Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine whether preoperative nutritional status (PNS) was a valuable predictor of outcome in patients with gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1320 patients with GC undergoing curative resection. The PNS score was constructed based on four objective and easily measurable criteria: prognostic nutritional index (PNI) score 1, serum albumin <35 g/L, body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2, or preoperative weight loss ≥5% of body weight. The PNS score was 2 for patients who met three or four criteria, 1 for those who met one or two criteria, and 0 for those who didn't meet all of these criteria. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) rates in patients with PNS scores 0, 1, and 2 were 59.1%, 42.4%, and 23.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed the PNS was an independent predictor for OS (HR for PNS 1 and PNS 2: 1.497, 95 % CI: 1.230-1.820 and 2.434, 95 % CI: 1.773-3.340, respectively; p < 0.001). Furthermore, 5-year OS ranged from 92% (stage I) to 37% (stage III), while the combination of TNM and PNS stratified 5-year OS from 95% (TNM I, PNS 0) to 19% (TNM III, PNS 3). Of note, the prognostic significance of PNS was still maintained when stratified by TNM stage, age, sex, tumor size, anemia and adjuvant chemotherapy (All P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PNS, a novel nutritional-based prognostic score, is independently associated with OS in GC. Prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.

Preoperative Nutritional Deficiency Is a Useful Predictor of Postoperative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative nutritional deficiency (ND) has been shown to be a valuable prognostic factor in urologic malignancies. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of ND in patients with gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A single-center cohort of 1026 GC patients undergoing curative resection between 2003 and 2012 was categorized to ND and nutritionally replete (NR) groups. Patients with body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, preoperative albumin <35 g/l, or preoperative weight loss ≥5% of body weight were defined as ND. RESULTS: Of the 1026 patients included in the study, 585 (57.0%) were categorized as ND. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 68.5% for ND patients and 44.0% for NR patients (P<.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ND was a significant predictor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.954; 95% confidence interval: 1.552-2.460; P<.001). In stage-stratified analysis, it was still independently associated with OS in tumor-nodes-metastasis stage II and III (P=.004 and P<.001, respectively). Of note, the prognostic significance of ND was still maintained when stratified by age, sex, anemia, and adjuvant chemotherapy (all Ps<.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ND is a novel predictor of outcome in GC, especially in stage II to III GC, and may help clinicians identify high-risk patients for proactive nutritional interventions.

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio plus platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting survival for patients with stage I-II gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer. We aimed to determine whether the combination of NLR and PLR (NLR-PLR) could better predict survival of patients after curative resection for stage I-II gastric cancer. METHODS: We collected data from the medical records of patients with stage I-II gastric cancer undergoing curative resection between December 2000 and November 2012 at the Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center. The preoperative NLR-PLR was calculated as follows: patients with both elevated NLR (≥2.1) and PLR (≥120) were given a score of 2, and patients with only one or neither were given a score of 1 or 0, respectively. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests revealed significant differences in overall survival (OS) among patients with NLR-PLR scores of 0, 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that OS was independently associated with the NLR-PLR score [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.24, P = 0.039] and TNM stage (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83, P = 0.041). However, other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores, including the modified Glasgow prognostic score, the prognostic nutritional index, and the combination of platelet count and NLR, were not. In TNM stage-stratified analysis, the prognostic significance of NLR-PLR was maintained in patients with stage I (P < 0.001) and stage II cancers (P = 0.022). In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the NLR-PLR score was higher than those of other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative NLR-PLR score is a useful predictor of postoperative survival in the patients with stage I-II gastric cancer and may help identify high-risk patients for rational therapy and timely follow-up.

Combined preoperative concentrations of CEA, CA 19-9, and 72-4 for predicting outcomes in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection.

In many cancers, prognostic factors are useful for identifying high-risk patients and in individualizing treatment. We sought to determine whether a combination of tumor markers (CTM) would improve prognostic accuracy in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The CTM score, which is derived from serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4), was tested retrospectively in 1134 patients with GC undergoing curative resection between October 2000 and December 2012. The CTM score was 2 for patients with two or three elevated markers, 1 for those with one elevated marker, and 0 for those no elevated markers. Overall survival (OS) in patients with CTM scores 0, 1, and 2 was 61.8%, 31.4%, and 15.1%, respectively (P<.001). The CTM score independently predicted OS on multivariate analysis (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.21; P<.001). Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the CTM score (0.67; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.70) was higher than the values of any individual marker (0.63, 0.57, 0.57; P<.001 for all comparisons). The CTM score independently predicted postoperative survival in GC, and it may have better clinical utility than individual tumor markers for identifying high-risk patients with GC.

The Efficacy of Adjuvant FOLFOX6 for Patients With Gastric Cancer after D2 Lymphadenectomy: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6) are widely used for treating resected gastric cancer in clinics in China, but only few clinical trials have investigated its efficacy. Using propensity score matching, we evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX6 following D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX6 following D2 lymphadenectomy (FOLFOX6, n = 113) or D2 lymphadenectomy only (surgery-only, n = 512) between 1998 and 2007 at our center were propensity score-matched; we identified a balanced 1:2 cohort, with 96 patients in the FOLFOX6 group and 192 patients in the surgery-only group. The overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; factors affecting survival were identified by Cox regression models. A nomogram incorporating independent prognosticators was constructed for predicting the 3-, 5-, and 7-year OS, and bootstrap validation was performed. The median follow-up was 9.3 years, and the 7-year OS was 52.1% in the FOLFOX6 group and 43.8% in the surgery-only group (P = 0.04), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval = 0.49-0.98). A prognostic nomogram was generated with the identified significant prognosticators (adjuvant FOLFOX6, number of total harvested nodes, the interaction effect between these two variables, tumor size, T and N stage). Internal validation of the nomogram revealed good predictive abilities, with a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.70. Adjuvant FOLFOX6 following D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with survival benefit in resected gastric cancer. Receiving adjuvant FOLFOX6 can be developed into a nomogram with other independent prognosticators to refine OS prediction and estimation of benefit from adjuvant FOLFOX6 for resected gastric cancer.

Nomogram based on systemic inflammatory response markers predicting the survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.

This study aimed to construct a nomogram to predict survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer (RGC) based on both clinicopathology characteristics and systemic inflammatory response markers (SIRMs). Of 3,452 RGC patients after D2 gastrectomy at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 1058 patients who met the inclusion criterion were analyzed. The patients operated on from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009 were assigned to the training set (817 patients) to establish a nomogram, and the rest (241 patients) were selected as validation set. Based on the training set, seven independent risk factors were selected in the nomogram. The calibration curves for probability of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) showed satisfactory accordance between nomogram prediction and actual observation. When the metastatic lymph node stage (mLNS) is replaced by metastasis lymph node ratio (mLNR) in validation set, the C-index in predicting OS rise from 0.77 to 0.79, higher than that of 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th (AJCC) staging system (0.70; p<0.001). In conclusions, the proposed nomogram which including mLNR and routine detected SIRMs resulted in optimal survival prediction for RGC patients after D2 gastrectomy.

Clinical utility of HER2 assessed by immunohistochemistry in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer (GC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 678 consecutive patients with GC undergoing curative surgery between October 2010 and December 2012 had resected tissue examined for HER2 and VEGF expression using immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemical expression of HER2 was analyzed using the DAKO-HercepTest™ and scored according to published reports. VEGF expression was calculated by multiplying the score for the percentage of positive cells by the intensity score. We defined positive expression as a score of 1+, 2+, or 3+, and a score of 0 was defined as negative expression. We compared these results to clinicopathological characteristics, including overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that HER2 expression was independently associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.18; P=0.01) and with higher tumor-nodes-metastasis stage (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.67-5.64; P<0.001) in patients with GC. VEGF expression was not associated with OS (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.86-1.82; P=0.24). HER2 expression was still identified as an independent prognostic factor in Stage II-III patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.004) but not in patients who received surgery alone (P=0.61). Among patients with Stage III GC, those without HER2 expression survived longer with adjuvant chemotherapy (median 43.9 vs 32.2 months, respectively; P=0.04), whereas those with HER2 expression did not (median 37.1 vs 33.9 months, respectively; P=0.67). CONCLUSION: HER2 expression is independently associated with OS in GC, especially in patients who are at higher risk and receive adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection. HER2 expression may have important clinical utility in directing adjuvant treatment for Stage III GC patients.

Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for gastric cancer using the national cancer registry.

A nomogram based on both western and eastern populations to estimate the Disease Specific Survival (DSS) of resectable gastric cancer (RGC) has not been established. In current study, we retrospectively analyzed 4,379 RGC patients who underwent curative resection from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2009 were assigned as training set (n= 2,770), and the rest were selected as SEER validation set (n= 1,609). An external validation was performed by a set of independent 1,358 RGC patients after D2 resection from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) in China. The nomogram was constructed based on the training set. The multivariate analysis identified that patient's age at diagnosis, race, tumor location, grade, depth of invasion, metastatic lymph node stage (mLNS) and total number of examined lymph node (TLN) were associated with patient's DSS. The discrimination of this nomogram was superior to that of the 7th edition of AJCC staging system in SEER validation set and SYSUCC validation set (0.73 versus 0.70, p=0.005; 0.76 versus 0.72, p=0.005; respectively). Calibration plots of the nomogram showed that the probability of DSS corresponded to actual observation closely. In conclusion, our nomogram resulted in more-reliable prognostic prediction for RGC patients in general population.

Prognostic Significance of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Staining in Cancer Tissues of Gastric Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the significance of the correlation among tissue carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression with serum CEA (sCEA) levels and long-term survival to highlight the clinical prognostic significance of tissue CEA expression in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Immunohistological method and radioimmunoassay were used to assess tissue and sCEA expression, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine correlations, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate the prognostic significance. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that tissue CEA in gastric cancer is significantly correlated with preoperative sCEA levels (p = 0.031), depth of invasion (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), distant metastasis (p = 0.001), and TNM staging (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates were 67.6, 53.9, and 40.1 % for negatively, moderately, and intensely positively stained tissues (p < 0.001), and 57.0 and 37.9 % for serum with normal and elevated CEA expression (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that tissue CEA can be considered an independent prognostic factor. Further analysis illustrated that patients with negative expression in both tissue and serum had better prognosis compared with those positively expressing CEA in both tissue and serum and/or those positively expressing CEA in either tissue or serum (p < 0.001). Our results also demonstrated that patients with negative tissue CEA staining and elevated sCEA expression had a better 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: Tissue CEA expression in gastric cancer is directly correlated with sCEA levels and long-term prognosis. Thus, tissue CEA expression can be considered as a useful biomarker to improve the interpretation of sCEA levels in predicting long-term survival.

Incorporation of N0 Stage with Insufficient Numbers of Lymph Nodes into N1 Stage in the Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification Improves Prediction of Prognosis in Gastric Cancer: Results of a Single-Institution Study of 1258 Chinese Patients.

PURPOSE: This study examined the prognosis of the "node-negative with eLNs ≤ 15" designation and the additional value of incorporating it into the pN1 designation in the seventh edition of the N classification. METHODS: From January 2000 to September 2010, a total of 1258 gastric cancer patients (patients with eLNs > 15 or node-negative with eLNs ≤ 15) undergoing radical gastric resection were enrolled in this study. We incorporated node-negative patients with eLNs ≤ 15 into pN1 and compared this designation with the current 7th edition UICC N stage for 3, 5-year overall survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients in the hypothetical N stage and the UICC N stage were compared using linear trend χ2, likelihood ratio χ2 statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations. RESULTS: Node-negative patients with eLNs ≤ 15 had worse survival compared with those with eLNs > 15. In univariate and multivariate analyses, the hypothetical N stage showed superiority to the 7th edition pN staging. The hypothetical staging system had higher linear trend and likelihood ratio χ (2) scores and smaller AIC values compared with those for the TNM system, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification. CONCLUSIONS: Node-negative patients with eLNs ≤ 15 can be considered to be incorporated into the pN1 stage in the 7th edition of the TNM classification.

Prognostic significance of Epstein-Barr virus infection in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. Recently, a number of studies have investigated the association between EBV infection and the prognosis of GC with controversial results. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to assess its prognostic significance. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies up to October 1, 2014. We investigated the association between EBV infection with survival in patients with GC. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate risk. RESULTS: A final analysis of 8,336 patients with GC from 24 studies was performed. Our analysis results indicated that the pooled HR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55-0.79; Z = 11.18, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by region revealed that the protective role of EBV infection only remained in the Asian population (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75; P < 0.001). When stratified by study quality and statistical methodology, the protective role could also be identified in high quality studies (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79) and in univariate analysis studies (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.74). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity and publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EBV has a favorable impact on GC patient's survival, especially in an Asian population. Future updated studies, especially large-scale randomized controlled studies stratified by region, are warranted as validation studies.

Preoperative C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts Prognosis of Patients after Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: An elevated preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and compare it with other systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 455 patients with GC undergoing curative resection. We investigated the correlations between the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to assess independent prognostic factors. The area under the curve was used to compare the prognostic value of different markers. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the CRP/Alb ratio were independently associated with OS in patients with GC (hazard ratio: 1.626; 95% confidence interval: 1.191-2.219; P = .002), along with age (P = .003), preoperative body weight loss (P = .001), tumor location (P = .008), metastatic lymph node ratio (P < .001), and seventh tumor-nodes-metastasis stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer) (P = .007). However, several other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, platelet lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index, Glasgow Prognostic Score, modified Glasgow prognostic score, and high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score) were not. In addition, the CRP/Alb ratio had a higher area under the curve value (0.625) compared with several other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative CRP/Alb ratio, a system inflammation-based prognostic score, is a superior predictor of OS in patients undergoing curative resection for GC and may help to identify the high-risk patients for treatment decisions.

Time trends of clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment for gastric cancer: Results from 2 high-volume institutions in southern China.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the time-related trends of tumor characteristics and postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC) in 2 high-volume centers in high incidence areas of southern China. METHODS: Based on the meticulously collected data from 5,327 patients with GC treated with operative intervention at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, we analyzed the differences in clinicopathologic features and postoperative survival over the following 4 consecutive periods: 1991-1995 (period 1), 1996-2000 (period 2), 2001-2005 (period 3), and 2006-2010 (period 4). RESULTS: Tumor size decreased (P = .001), but the proportion of poorly differentiated tumors increased (P < .001) over the study periods. Early GC was diagnosed more often in later periods, gradually increasing from 7 to 15% (P < .001). A surprising improvement was observed in the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes, ranging from 10.36 to 26.22 (P < .001). The radical resection rate increased from 88 to 93%. The overall 5-year survival rate improved steadily over the 4 periods, from 39 to 53% (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor location, histologic type, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, number of retrieved lymph nodes, radical resection, and time periods were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The clinicopathologic features of tumors changed during the observation period in our region. The increasingly early detection of patients with GC and more standardized regimens for operative management, including routinely performed D2 lymphadenectomy, most likely resulted in the increase in overall survival.

Vitamin intake reduce the risk of gastric cancer: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized and observational studies.

AIM: The association between vitamin intake and gastric cancer (GC) has been widely debated due to the relatively weak evidence. In this study, a meta-analysis of prospective and well designed observational studies were performed to explore this association. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Sciencedirect were searched for studies of vitamin consumption and gastric cancer. This produced 47 relevant studies covering 1,221,392 human subjects. Random effects models were used to estimate summary relative risk (RR). Dose-response, subgroup, sensitivity, meta-regression, and publication bias analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The RR of gastric cancer in the group with the highest vitamin intake was compared to that of the lowest intake group. Total vitamin intake was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83). In 9 studies that individuals were given doses at least 4 times above the tolerable upper intake (UL) vitamins, the RR was 1.20 (95% CI, 0.99-1.44). However, in 17 studies that individuals received doses below the UL, the RR was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68-0.86). Dose-response analysis was conducted on different increments in different types of vitamins (vitamin A: 1.5 mg/day, vitamin C: 100 mg/day, vitamin E: 10 mg/day) intake with a significant reduction in the risk of gastric cancer, respectively, 29% in vitamin A, 26% in vitamin C, and 24% in vitamin E. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis clearly demonstrated that low doses of vitamins can significantly reduce the risk of GC, especially vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E.

[Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): Chinese subgroup analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent curative D2 resection in China. METHODS: This is a subgroup analysis of Chinese patients in the capecitabine and oxaliplatin adjuvant study in stomach cancer (CLASSIC study), which was a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, phase III( study in the Asia-Pacific region. A total of 100 gastric cancer patients who received curative D2 gastrectomy were enrolled in this study and were randomly assigned to either XELOX group (oral capecitabine combined with intravenous oxaliplatin chemotherapy) or the control group (surgery alone). This study aims to compare the 3-year disease-free between the two groups. RESULTS: Subgroup analysis showed that 3-year DFS rate were 78% and 56% in XELOX and control group, respectively. The risk of relapse in XELOX group was reduced by 59% (HR=0.41, 95%CI:0.20-0.85, P=0.013), compared with the control group. The 3-year overall survival rate were 78% and 66% in XELOX and control group, with no statistically significant difference (HR=0.55, 95%CI:0.26-1.16, P=0.110). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant XELOX chemotherapy following D2 gastrectomy may improve the survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer in China.