Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 106: 108264, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37119748

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Necrotizing fasciitis is an aggressive skin and soft tissue infection that is a surgical emergency, and Haemophilus influenzae (H. flu) is a rare cause. We present a case of H. flu co-infection causing necrotizing fasciitis in the setting of COVID-19 pneumonia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old male presented with 2 weeks of upper respiratory symptoms. He was unvaccinated against COVID-19 and tested positive for COVID-19 five days prior. He developed respiratory failure requiring intubation, and was treated with dexamethasone, remdesivir, and tocilizumab for COVID-19 pneumonia. On hospital day 2, he was hypotensive with new rapidly evolving erythematous lesions with crepitus of his lower extremities suspicious for necrotizing fasciitis. He underwent wide excision and debridement with significant hemodynamic improvements. H. flu co-infection was identified from blood cultures. Aberrant cells with 94 % lymphocytes were noted and suggested chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that was not previously known. He developed progressive lesions globally, concerning for purpura fulminans with clinical disseminated intravascular coagulation and neurological decline ultimately leading to withdrawal of care. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: COVID-19 infection is often associated with concomitant opportunistic infections. Our patient was also immunocompromised by CLL, diabetes, chronic steroids, and initial appropriate COVID-19 treatments. Despite appropriate treatments, he could not overcome his medical comorbidities and multiple infections. CONCLUSION: Necrotizing fasciitis caused by H. flu is rare, and we present the first case as a co-infection in the setting of COVID-19 pneumonia. Due to the patient's immunocompromised state with underlying CLL, this proved to be fatal.

2.
Am J Surg ; 223(3): 555-558, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34772480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residents are often viewed as contributors to Emergency Department (ED) prolongation of length of stay (LOS). To understand this proposition, we performed a study to identify ED patient care intervals and how each contributed to LOS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data on 145 ED surgery consults. Residents prospectively documented patient names, page times, and time of plan. Key ED patient care intervals were then retrospectively extracted from the patient's chart. A time analysis was then performed. RESULTS: Average arrival to disposition time was 305 min, and residents averaged 47 min to see and staff consults. The longest intervals were arrival to imaging (75 min) and imaging time (73 min). Average disposition to discharge time was 170 min (36% of LOS). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery residents see and staff consults within the norms for care established by the hospital. Imaging time is a bottleneck hindering disposition. Access block also significantly increases ED LOS.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Length of Stay , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...