Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma: a two-center study.

Background: Sarcoma is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved the prognosis to some extent, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory in some patients. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma need further evaluation. Methods: We conducted a two-center study of sarcoma patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital and Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. The treatment regimens included PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy based on PD-1 inhibitors. The observed primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 43 patients were included from the two centers. The median follow-up time for all patients was 13 months (range, 1-48 months). In the group of 37 patients with advanced or unresectable sarcoma, the mPFS was 6 months (95%CI: 5-12 months), and the mOS was 16 months (95%CI: 10-28 months). The ORR was 10.8% (4/37), and the DCR was 18.9% (7/37). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.11) and mOS (p=0.88) between patients with PD-L1 negative/positive expression. There were also no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.13) or mOS (p=0.72) between PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy. Additionally, there were no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.52) or mOS (p=0.49) between osteogenic sarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma. Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.66) or mOS (p=0.96) between PD-1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapy and PD-1 inhibitors combined with AI chemotherapy. Among the 6 patients receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery, the mPFS was 15 months (95%CI: 6-NA months), and the mOS was not reached. In terms of safety, most adverse events were mild (grade 1-2) and manageable. The most severe grade 4 adverse events were bone marrow suppression, which occurred in 4 patients but resolved after treatment. There was also one case of a grade 4 adverse event related to hypertension. Conclusion: Immunotherapy is an effective treatment modality for sarcoma with manageable safety. Further inclusion of more patients or prospective clinical trials is needed to validate these findings.

The fusion gene LRP1-SNRNP25 drives invasion and migration by activating the pJNK/37LRP/MMP2 signaling pathway in osteosarcoma.

Through transcriptome sequencing, we previously identified a new osteosarcoma-specific, frequent fusion gene, LRP1-SNRNP25, and found that it played an important role in tumor cell invasion and migration. However, the specific mechanism remains unclear. In this article, whole-genome sequencing further confirmed that the LRP1-SNRNP25 fusion gene is formed by fusion of LRP1 exon 8 and SNRNP25 exon 2. In vitro, scratch and Transwell assays demonstrated that the migration and invasion abilities of LRP1-SNRNP25-overexpressing osteosarcoma cells were significantly increased. To explore the molecular mechanism of the LRP1-SNRNP25 fusion in affecting osteosarcoma cell migration and invasion, we evaluated the migration and invasion-related molecular signaling pathways by western blotting. Some migration- and invasion-related genes, including pJNK and MMP2, were upregulated. Coimmunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry showed that 37LRP can interact with pJNK. Western blotting confirmed that LRP1-SNRNP25 overexpression upregulates 37LRP protein expression. Immunofluorescence staining showed the intracellular colocalization of LRP1-SNRNP25 with pJNK and 37LRP proteins and that LRP1-SNRNP25 expression increased the pJNK and 37LRP levels. Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) confirmed that LRP1-SNRNP25 interacted with pJNK and 37LRP proteins. The pJNK inhibitor SP600125 dose-dependently decreased the pJNK/37LRP/MMP2 levels. After siRNA-mediated 37LRP knockdown, the MMP2 protein level decreased. These two experiments proved the upstream/downstream relationship among pJNK, 37LRP, and MMP2, with pJNK the farthest upstream and MMP2 the farthest downstream. These results proved that the LRP1-SNRNP25 fusion gene exerts biological effects through the pJNK/37LRP/MMP2 signaling pathway. In vivo, LRP1-SNRNP25 promoted osteosarcoma cell growth. Tumor growth was significantly inhibited after SP600125 treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the pJNK, MMP2, and Ki-67 protein levels were significantly increased in tumor tissues of LRP1-SNRNP25-overexpressing cell-injected nude mice. Furthermore, lung and liver metastasis were more prevalent in these mice. In a word, LRP1-SNRNP25 promotes invasion, migration, and metastasis via pJNK/37LRP/MMP2 pathway. LRP1-SNRNP25 is a potential therapeutic target for LRP1-SNRNP25-positive osteosarcoma.

Tumoral C2 Regulates the Tumor Microenvironment by Increasing the Ratio of M1/M2 Macrophages and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures to Improve Prognosis in Melanoma.

Immunotherapy is an essential therapy for individuals with advanced melanoma. However, not all patients respond to such treatment due to individual differences. We conducted a multidimensional analysis using transcriptome data from our center, as well as publicly available databases. We found that effective nivolumab treatment led to an upregulation of C2 levels, and higher levels following treatment are indicative of a good outcome. Through bioinformatics analyses and immunofluorescence, we identified a correlation between C2 and M1 macrophages. To further investigate the role of C2 in melanoma, we constructed subcutaneous tumorigenic models in C57BL/6 mice. The tumors in the C2 overexpression group exhibited significantly smaller sizes. Flow cytometric analysis of the mouse tumors demonstrated enhanced recruitment of macrophages, particularly of the M1 subtype, in the overexpression group. Moreover, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed that C2-positive tumor cells exhibited enhanced communication with immune cells. We co-cultured tumor cell supernatants with macrophages in vitro and observed the induction of M1 subtype polarization. In addition, we discovered a close correlation between C2 and tertiary lymphoid structures. C2 has been demonstrated to exert a protective effect, mediated by its ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment. C2 serves as a prognostic marker for melanoma and can be employed to monitor the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Pan-Soft Tissue Sarcoma Analysis of the Incidence, Survival, and Metastasis: A Population-Based Study Focusing on Distant Metastasis and Lymph Node Metastasis.

Background: The rarity and complexity of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) make it a challenge to determine the incidence, survival, and metastasis rates. In addition, the clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis have rarely been reported. Methods: Data on patients diagnosed with STS in the SEER database from 2000 to 2018 were extracted by SEER*Stat 8.3.9.1, and the incidence trend was calculated by Joinpoint 4.9 software. The KM method was used to calculate the survival curve, and the log-rank method was used to compare differences in the survival curves. The clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis were screened by logistic regression. Results: Among the 35987 patients, 4299 patients (11.9%) had distant metastasis. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 6.02%, which included patients suffering from both lymph node and distant metastasis. Considering that some lymph node metastases might be accompanying events of distant metastasis, the rate of only lymph node metastasis in STS patients decreased to 3.42% after excluding patients with distant metastasis. Patients with only lymph node metastases (N1/2M0) had a significantly worse prognosis than those without metastases (N0M0) but a better prognosis than those with only distant metastases (N0M1) (p<0.0001). In the multivariate logistic analysis, STS patients with larger tumors located in the head and neck, viscera, retroperitoneum, and certain specific pathological subtypes (compared with the liposarcoma), such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, synovial sarcoma, and angiosarcoma, had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: Lymph node metastasis is rare in STS, and the metastasis rate is significantly different among the different pathological types. Tumor size, location, and pathological subtype are significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis. The overall survival of patients with lymph node metastasis is better than that of patients with distant metastasis, which suggests a more precise prognosis evaluation should be performed in these AJCC stage IV STS patients.

Perioperative Serum Scoring Systems Predict Early Recurrence and Poor Prognosis of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective: Some patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are prone to rapid recurrence or metastasis after radical resection. However, evaluation methods for effectively identifying these patients are lacking. In this study, we established perioperative serum scoring systems to screen patients with early recurrence and poor prognosis. Methods: We systematically analysed 44 perioperative serum parameters, including systemic inflammatory parameters, coagulation system parameters, tumor markers, and 18 clinicopathological characteristics of 218 patients with radical resection in our centre. Univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression models were used to screen variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare relapse-free survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox regression was used to evaluate the independent risk variables. AUC and C-index were used to reveal the effectiveness of the models. In addition, the effectiveness was also verified in an independent cohort of 109 patients. Results: Preoperative systemic immune coagulation cascade (SICC) (including increased neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, decreased lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, increased platelet and fibrinogen) and increased postoperative tumor markers (TMs) (CA199, CEA and CA242) were independent risk factors for early recurrence of resectable pancreatic cancer. On this basis, we established the preoperative SICC score and postoperative TMs score models. The patients with higher preoperative SICC or postoperative TMs score were more likely to have early relapse and worse prognosis. The nomogram based on preoperative SICC, postoperative TMs, CACI, smoking index, vascular cancer embolus and adjuvant chemotherapy can effectively evaluate the recurrence rate (AUC1 year: 0.763, AUC2 year: 0.679, AUC3 year: 0.657) and overall survival rate (AUC1 year: 0.770, AUC3 year: 0.804, AUC5 year: 0.763). Conclusion: Preoperative SICC and postoperative TMs can help identify resectable PDAC patients with early recurrence and poor prognosis.

Role of the preoperative circulating tumor DNA KRAS mutation in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Aim: The prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer patients with the same stage of disease is highly variable. The purpose of this study is to establish a scoring system for preoperative screening of resectable patients. Materials & methods: The clinical information and laboratory tests of 105 resectable patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled and analyzed. Results: The consistency of clinical stage and pathological stage was poor (κ = 0.193; p < 0.003). We performed a comprehensive scoring system with KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (mutKRAS ctDNA) for the resectable patients. Patients with higher scores were more prone to early postoperative recurrence and poorer prognosis. Conclusion: The scoring system can help preoperatively screen out resectable patients who are prone to early postoperative recurrence.