ABSTRACT
Background: Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma/primary neuroectodermal tumor (EES/PNET) is a rare, malignant, small round blue cell tumor, which usually involves the larynx, kidneys, and esophagus. The most common metastatic sites are lung and bone. The incidence of epidural EES/PNET was 0.9%, and a detailed search of the PubMed literature found only 7 case reports of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children. Case description: We report a case of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in a child with chest and back pain as the first symptom, which worsened after half a year and developed incomplete paralysis of both lower extremities and urinary incontinence. She underwent emergency surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and died of lung metastases 8 months after surgery. Conclusion: Primary epidural tumors are mostly benign, such as spinal meningiomas and neuromas. Contrary to what has been previously thought, we report a case of malignant epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction without bone destruction; The rarity of epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children has led to a lack of data, particularly on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. Due to the difficulty of early diagnosis and high mortality, spine surgeons must explore and increase their awareness of this disease.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the conventional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been developed to address some of the shortcomings associated with ACDF by preserving function of the motion segment. Controversy still surrounds regarding whether CDA is better. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2014 in which CDA was compared with ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials. Then, we performed the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant RCTs with a total of 4061 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that CDA was superior to ACDF regarding better neurological success (P < 0.00001), greater motion preservation at the operated level (P < 0.00001), fewer secondary surgical procedures (P < 0.00001), and fewer rates of adverse events (P < 0.00001) but inferior to ACDF regarding operative times (P < 0.00001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding blood loss (P = 0.87), lengths of hospital stay (P = 0.76), neck pain scores (P = 0.11) and arm pain scores (P = 0.78) reported on a visual analog scale. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis revealed that CDA demonstrated superiorities in better neurological success, greater motion preservation at the operated level, lower rate of adverse events and fewer secondary surgical procedures compared with ACDF. However, the benefits of blood loss, lengths of hospital stay, neck and arm pain functional recovery are still unable to be proved.
